 When you guys first started raising, was there any pushback or did you have to kind of to Michael's point? Did you have to really educate them on what it was that they were investing in on the industry, where things were going? Yeah. I think thankfully our messaging was easier than perhaps some other companies in our batch. So if you're developing something like a very obscure developers tool or backend API, it requires definitely a much more difficult and creative explanation. Our pitch was that we ship weed from brands to dispensaries and I thought that was a pretty simple enough thing to sell. And I think especially in 2019 when we were going through YC, there was a lot of enthusiasm about the new space, the changing regulations and a rapid desigmatization of the substance itself. I think even five years ago cannabis was mostly seen as a recreational drug and something that teens abuse to get higher, et cetera. And I think I felt that firsthand growing up in Virginia, but just in the last five years, public opinion has shifted quite drastically. Yeah. And so you just closed the big round. Congratulations. Thank you. Max was just here telling us about it. Do you want to share your story on how this almost didn't happen? Raising money in cannabis is definitely challenging and it's a different beast because essentially what we have is a technology company that happens to own some infrastructure and the license to actually transport the goods. And a lot of people ask like, why don't you just decide to be a software company? It would be so much more investable, easier. The reason why we did both was because it was what we felt was best for the customer experience. When you order something, you expect to get it in a certain amount of time and in an immature industry, it's really important that you control that experience. So we made that kind of tough call to be both plant touching and technology early on, but we kind of are now running into this problem where kind of Silicon Valley tech investors can't invest into our company because we're still plant touching and they may have LPA restrictions. I say they can't invest in vices or federally legal goods or whatever services in cannabis. And then we also have kind of a class of supply, more traditional supply chain investors who fail to see that we really are a technology company. They try to assess us only on the trucking aspect. And Vince McGo founder leads a lot of these fundraising conversations, but it's really that conveying that message correctly and finding that intersection of people who's first comfortable investing in cannabis, but also see our potential of being something potentially really scalable. We started raising the round early this year and frankly, it wasn't a terrible time to raise. There's certainly a lot of enthusiasm around cannabis with the Democratic party taking supermajority. There's a lot of kind of promise and hype around like, will cannabis get furthered and from a regulatory perspective in the next couple of years. And that led to kind of a quick rise in the public markets. You mentioned that you invested in public cannabis stocks, although that enthusiasm has somewhat qualified because it seems like the administration has other priorities for now. And regardless, we were able to kind of find the interest pretty quickly. By February, we had determined a lead who essentially started due diligence process. By March and April, we had a term sheet. We had all the legal docs kind of final. And the last steps were just kind of doing the paperwork and cradling the rest of the investors in. But sometime last month, it came to our attention or it was brought to our attention by our lead investor or to be lead investor that they could no longer invest in cannabis. And it was due to legal technicality because they had invested in a cannabis testing lab before. And there's a small fine print in most states regulations. It's kind of an idea of separation of church and state where if you are a financial interest holder or an owner in a testing lab, you cannot actually own an operating company. And I think that regulation was probably written in with good intentions. But it was certainly disappointing to hear this at the 11th hour. We had essentially told everyone that this was happening. And to go back and tell them actually our lead who's been vouching for this round is pulling out, please remain in the round. And I think we really kind of pulled off this gymnastics. Thankfully one of our earlier investors rose up to the occasion and decided to take the lead instead. And the outcome at the end was favorable. So definitely grateful. It's amazing.