We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results





The interactive transcript could not be loaded.



Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Feb 9, 2011

This video is a work in progress. Thank you for the feedback.

NIST's WTC Investigation has produced an unsubstantiated report on the Twin Towers and WTC7. Thus, claims that they have produced accurate work are arguments based on the bare assertion fallacy. Since this cannot be considered scientific, appeals to NIST as the final judge of what is fact or not are appeals to unqualified authority, another fallacy. Meanwhile, both the media and the largely uninformed public fail to use the fallacies to think logically about the matter.

Patrick Gallagher, a man who "might jeopardize public safety"
S. Shyam Sunder - "The science is behind what we said"
John Gross - "Why don't you ask a technical question"
Ben Stein - "We've got to move on"
Jonathan Barnett, BBC expert sidestepping the sulfur issue
Rick Sisson - "This would be the kind of result I would expect"
Matt Dayton, who does not blindly believe bare assertions
Jonathan Cole, 911speakout.org, The Great Thermate Debate
Shane Geiger, non-lapdog reporter
Wolf Blitzer - "but no one was sure why UNTIL NOW"
Deborah Feyerick "So why doesn't everyone buy it?"
Christoph Roeckerath - "Thank you, that was a minute"

Special thanks to the entire NCST Advisory Committee: You have put on quite a show.

National Construction Safety Team (NCST) Advisory Committee
Shyam Sunder
William Grosshandler
Lew Richard Bukowski
Fahim Sadek
Frank Gayle
Richard Gann
John Gross
Therese McAllister
Jason Averill
James Lawson
Harold E. Nelson
Stephen Cauffman


When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next

to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...