 Happy New Year, everyone, and thank you for joining us. This meeting is being recorded. My name is Dawn Filibert. I'm the chair of the Development Review Board, and I'd like to introduce other members of the board who are present tonight. John Stern, Frank Cokman and Quinn Mann, and from the city of South Burlington, Marlekeen, who's our development review planner. Since no one is in attendance at City Hall tonight, I will skip the typical emergency procedures and whatever, but I'm wondering if there are any announcements before we move on to tonight's agenda. I don't have any. Okay, does anyone else. All right, let's move ahead to. Agenda item number five. Continued site application SP22020 of Naglian Chase construction to construct a single story, 21,790 square feet office building, create 2,160 square feet of outdoor storage, and associated site improvements at 39 Bowdoin Street. The applicant has requested continuation of the review of this application. So the staff is recommending that it be continued to February 7, 2023 to allow for coordination with the city stormwater section. Do I hear a motion to continue this application? I'd like to move that we continue this application until February 7, 2023. Thank you, John. Do I have a second? A second. Thanks Quinn. Any discussion? All in favor of continuing site application SP22020 to February 7. Say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. Agenda item number six. Site plan application SP22055 of Burlington International Airport to amend a previously approved plan for an airport complex. The amendment consists of construction of an expansion of the existing taxiway G and construction of a new apron at 1200 airport drive. The amendment has also requested continuation of this applicant to February 7, 2023 to allow for coordination with the city stormwater section and the city water department. So I would be happy to entertain a motion to continue this application. I'd like to submit a motion that we continue application SP22055 until February 7, 2023. Thank you, John. Do I have a second? Second. Thanks Frank. Any discussion before we take a vote? Okay. All in favor of continuing SP22055 to February 7, say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? No. Okay. I think the remaining agenda item involves the minutes of December 6. Oh, do we have 20th? I didn't see those. I thought they were both in there. I might, I might have missed it. But I wasn't at the December 6 meeting, but I can still vote. Can I have read those? That's correct. Yep. Okay. All in favor of approving the minutes of the December 6th and December 20th, 2022 minutes. Hang on just a second. I have a minor correction. I get. Okay. Frank, which one? I think it's on page three or four. In the carryover paragraph, the word swipe should be white. It should be what? I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Go to page. I think it's four more. Okay. Top or bottom of four. It's a carryover paragraph. Yes. I see that. Oh, yeah. It should be what Frank site. I'm looking at, I made a comment. Right. I think it's just a mistake. I think it's just a mistake. I think it's just a mistake. I think it's just a mistake. I think it's just a mistake. Right. Not swipe. Oh, right. Okay. And then. It's just one with us. She could, she could pick that up or somebody make that correction. It's just a type of. Yep. And then. I think there's just a mistake. And I think that later on. In the discussion of. Can we scroll down another page or so. There's a discussion of the. The commission into the setback or incursion into the buffer. And I had commented that, you know, it was an increase in volume. And therefore. An additional. And additional nonconformity. And the way this is reported, I don't think this quite right. I don't think Marla said it's not an on conformity. I think what she said was Marley. Correct. Maybe a week. I understand. To recall another way. that it could be corrective in this case by simply modifying the buffer zone once the board had the authority to do it. Is that right, Mark? Do you remember the same way? There it is. This said that they are not in conformity. They are increasing conformity, whether it's something we can see scrolling along conformity by modifying the buffer zone, right? Right, yes, that is it. Wasn't that the thrust? And I don't want it to say they're not increasing in conformity because in fact, they are according to the case law. But it doesn't, it can be fixed in this case. I'd like the language to be, I don't have the exact language, but we should fix that. Good catch, Frank. Only a lawyer's eye. Well, and also, it came out of my mouth, so one tends to focus on what one reported to that. Right, of course. Sorry, I have to zoom when though is like blocking what I'm trying to do here. So if I make this font a little smaller. If you could get rid of, they are not increasing in non-conformity. That's the most. Right, so what I was going to do is I was going to replace both of these. Oh my. And this line with that, Ms. Keene said that the board can modify the standard so that it is no longer in non-conformity. There you go, that's it, which is the problem. Okay. Perfect. Any other changes, Frank, or anyone else on the board? I'm fine. So I will move adoption of the minutes of December 6th and December 20th. Is there, do I have a second? Thank you. Any discussion? All in favor, say aye. Aye. Opposed? Okay, thank you. I think that's the end of our agenda. And so is there any other business? No. Okay, 7.15 and we are out. The meeting is over. Thank you. We'll see you in two weeks, minus one day. No, we're actually on a Wednesday because of... Oh, again? Okay. Yeah, it's our lucky Wednesday for a little bit though. So we'll see you. Okay, so we'll see you in two weeks from tonight. Weeks, all right. Thank you. Thanks, everyone. Happy New Year. Thank you, everybody. Take care. Bye. Bye.