 It is very clear to me that industry needs to rely on new information, new impact, new ideas, new concepts. As the world in 10 to 15 years will look completely different. Scientists use money. These people make money. So without an understanding between the two of us, and hopefully they make more money than we use money, the system cannot work. To be honest, without the use of OIST, we feel very sorry for each other. We think that many Japanese companies need to understand OIST's important areas, important research, and think about it. With the use of SANTO and GAKU, it is very easy to move the system together. First of all, as one of the three industries, we want to connect with OIST and make sure that we have the most important R&D. There is diversity and new discoveries are coming. In that sense, OIST is a great example of success, and it is the first time in Japan to gather high-quality ingredients and lead them to success. I would like to apologize again, but without using this, we will not be able to develop. With the use of the new coronavirus in the world of academia, of course we will develop the power of science, but with collaboration, we are able to create the power together. Companies that work together with science are more competitive than companies that do not work with science. Very general. What we have to generate is an interface that both of us know what the other has. And that, I believe, is for mutual benefit. I think it is a problem that we have to work together in a short period of time to make sure that we do not have to work together. If we continue to work together, will we be able to make it more efficient? In Japan, the economy has become a short period of time. This pandemic has caused us to reflect on such things. We have been through a lot of things around 311, but we have not been able to do so in the future. For example, in the climate change, it is very important that the carbon dioxide is a very important element. Even now, Mr. Madabe is going to resign. It is a very long time. But the importance of 3S is that we are pursuing psychology, pursuing the psychology of the devil. In the process of making a lot of money, what we have learned from the basic research is that psychology is actually a dream. We want to do something like this first, so we want to do it. In the industrial world, there are fewer people who talk about dreams. The dream is very important. Linking dreams and 3S. To be honest, we have to do something useful in the world as a 3S industry. We have to do something useful in the world as a 3S industry. We have to do something useful in the future with a more long-term vision. I think that the researchers are chasing dreams. But it is not something that is useful now. We have to do something useful in the future to make the dream of the future a more meaningful one. We have to make the dream of the researchers a more meaningful one. You have to distinguish between the dream of a scientist who is after a very fundamental question. And the dream of a science manager or CEO who has to make sure that the entire operation works. So we need growth in order to make more impact. But OIST has addressed so many problems that currently are in the Japanese universities. Structure, governance. We have like 50 or what different nations on campus. 65% of the professors are non-Japanese. 80% of the students are non-Japanese. So we have shown how can you attract those people. And parts of that I believe can be transferred to the local universities. If you look at the performance of the Japanese science in the past decade or so, it is the least productive one of all G7 countries. So you have to ask yourself, can we sustain the economic future of Japan? I personally think, given the speed with which currently the changes occur, no. I think there is no leader who can manage the background of the researchers as a growth student. I think it is important to look at OIST and learn how much it can be done. I think it is very weak in Japan to be able to take the power of sustainability that we call the wide field of vision. Looking at OIST, I don't think much about what is going on. It has already been removed from the global standard. Unfortunately, I think it is very natural to give money to Stanford or MIT. If not for us, we won't be able to win. We will give money to the school that we can win. If we accept that we should follow this model, I think the Japanese university will continue. We will not use money in Japan and go to other universities. You have to have a high level professional board or in micro executives and you trust these executives in their specific area of expertise. I think this professionalism has to be adopted in Japanese universities. These structures have all been realized in western universities. So Japan has to little by little to evolve into that type of structure to be more competitive. I think the Japanese government has to do what they want to do. I think it is very important to have a strong sense of creativity and trust in the organization. We have to be more independent. We have to be more independent. We have to be more independent. We have to be more independent. We have to be more independent. I think Japan is a great country when children are struggling with war and they lose the war. When we think of a better world, we need to learn a lot more from outside the country. To learn the history we have to do this to train our children to be more independent. Unfortunately, it is a different society We need to protect science and the pursuit of a new religion. We need to put more effort into these things. This is also the case with the company. I would like to hear what kind of collaboration it would be if OIST and, for example, Sandori-san could collaborate. Compared to the ones that died early, this would be a major step forward. Now we have to work with somebody to realize the potential. I'm talking about going ahead for, you know, 10, 20 years from now. But I'm fully convinced this is where science will go. And if we understand this, we can have what some people already now call molecular food. First of all, how does the food industry feel about food? And what do you think Sandori is thinking about? How do we use the power of science to solve this problem? One of the problems is that we want to live in a long-term healthy life. Another problem is that we lack food. And what we can communicate with each other is that in 2050, there will be no more than 40 billion people in the world. And the food industry will be in a difficult situation. We will use as little water as possible. And CO2 will be created in a way that will not be produced. This is science. This is a very important field. We also want to aim for a world that is not an unnatural or unnatural. This is a bad thing as a global system. I think that the 21st century is an unforgivable age. And the good thing about it is that it is a very difficult problem to solve. I think this is very important. Another thing I want to do is that we want to live in a healthy and healthy life. We want to live in a healthy and healthy life. I think it is our job to create a world that is not an unnatural or unnatural. I think it is very interesting to be involved in the field of mindfulness and science. What is relaxing? There is a sense of happiness on the outside. There is a sense of happiness on the outside. There is a sense of happiness on the outside. This is a science that shows the truth. It is a tool for the research of the brain and the research of nutrition. Mindfulness and nutrition for food. I think that this kind of thing will be very interesting from now on. When we collaborate with Nienami-san, we will be able to create a world that is really interesting. So what we will have in the future of healthcare? You will have a molecular analysis of each one of us. And each one of us will have the information as to how can you specifically as an individual extend your life. I think the food industry plus areas that are let's call it early diagnostic areas in healthcare, you can then tailor-made the response. And you have a continuous feedback loop with the medical center in which your data are being compared with your usual data in order to keep you healthy. And you can put this together in order to then give you a recipe for a long life. This is what I think will happen. It's been said a lot that there is a lot of science, but I think it wasn't possible. We are able to invest that money in new research. And we are able to make a big dream come true. We are a country that cannot live without a connection with the world. So we have to make a system that creates a discussion. We need to do science and science. We can communicate more with science and science. We have a lot of foundations. In that sense, I think it's optimistic that Pita-san will be able to do something like that. The most important thing is that we have to make sure that we connect. We have to make sure that we have a big connection. We have to make sure that we can create a system that allows us to make donations. We are able to make donations directly. And when we make donations, we will be able to see the PDC. It's been 5 or 10 years. We are able to see what's going on. There are a lot of countries and countries that are participating in this. We are able to see how strong Japan is and how good Japan is. What kind of things do we need as Japan? We need to make sure that we have a lot of people who have the right to do science. Science is a new concept. We need to be aware of it while we don't know. It's called trans-science. We need to make sure that we have a lot of people who have the right to do science. We need to have a lot of people who can talk to Pita-san. We need more leaders like Ninami-san in industry. And we need a similar open mind. Despite the fact that there will not be an immediate benefit for many things that we are discussing. It is critical that this triangle works together in order to secure a long-term future. I think we Japanese are weak in diversity. In other words, we need to make sure that we have the right to do science. We need to make sure that we have the right to think. We need to make sure that we have the right to think. We need to make sure that we have the right to do science. I hope that this will be a good opportunity for us to do science. I think there are more women in science than there are women in this country. So I would like to emphasize this at the end of this video.