The End of Affordability Part 5
Uploader Comments (Wildhiland)
Video Responses
All Comments (12)
-
Govt needs to build housing. [they don't care what type] at the lowest possible cost to themselves. Those that build housing, DEVELOPERS, want to build as cheaply as possible, housing that can be sold as expensively as possible.
So Govt. controls where developers can build, so they can control housing. BUT developers will only build what pays them. The more govt, need housing, the more leverage Developers have, and so the more expensive housing will end up being. See PROOF
-
Bloody spot on mate. I appreciate and commend those who stand up and make a very important issue known that is under everyones nose. I have myself lost everything due to the incresing cost of living. Firstly my house in sydney which in my case i had to relocate to a rural way of living to try and survive as sydney became to much to bare. now i am forced to live in a public housing enviroment and am losing my marriage to unaffordability to provide what australia use to be about. Good on ya mate.
-
There's a railway, several air routes, and long-haul buses that lead to Melbourne from Sydney, as well as a couple of different road routes if you prefer driving. I also hear there are competitive rates for moving all your furniture down there. When are you leaving?
-
Essentially, we have a political and planning system that doesn't encourage vision. It is about short-term gains, turning a profit and holding onto power and influence. If government terms were longer and there was an easier way to keep governments and politicians in check (other than sacking and appointing auditors/administrators) then I think we'd have better planning for a start. Unfortunately, there is no perfect system as there are many and varied desires and choices in a "free" society.
The optimal population size for cities is between 750,000 to 950,000 thousand people, and planning policies alone will not stop a city from growing past this point. Having electoral systems like the proportional system that exists in Tasmania that enourages decentralisation and regionalism might help in stopping mega cities from emerging.
rboniii 2 years ago
There is a lot of merit in what you are proposing. Thank you for your constructive contribution.
Wildhiland 2 years ago
A commendable effort, although it is more of a video treatise than a documentary.
I believe it's important to be passionate about local issues, such as planning and development.
Looking forward to seeing some more engaging videos from your point of view.
3DegreeSydney 3 years ago
Thanks. I definitely agree with you regarding our planning system, at least regarding its lack of vision. Of course planners think otherwise. They think of themselves as true visionaries, just like when they built the high-rise towers of the 1950s & 60s for public housing. Now they want to shove everyone into these things whether they like it or not. Of course developers love it, and now the Federal Government is going to bail them out, because overseas money has dried up. How convenient!
Wildhiland 3 years ago
Save Our Suburbs SUCKS!
wilde567477 3 years ago
Why so serious - it's all part of the plan!
Wildhiland 3 years ago