NIST WTC 7 Report - Press Briefing 8/21/08 pt 5

...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• wtc
• thermite
• thermate
• controlled
• Demolition
• Shyam
• Sunder
• NIST
• report
• c-span
• truth
• questions
• think

[blite13]

So the point would be what genius? The point is , I'll tell it to you because you are just to freakin stupid, NIST said there was no proof of explosions, when obviously there is. If it isn't explosives then tell us what it was. Instead, they go right around it and say there was no proof, so that proves they are LIARS. Figure it out you dumbass, you keep defending KNOWN LIARS WHO ARE COVERING UP MURDER. Molten metal, NIST lied about that as well, much testimony on that and they say "no proof".

[blite13]

LOl, office fires get no hotter than 600 degress C. tHIS IS A KNOWN FACT. Just because there is a test at 2000 degrees means NOTHING. Temp at 600 means the steel was getting temps of around 400, so your theory is BUNK.

[blavatsky3]

he's diffusing the argument by talking about regular thermite and not the special explosive quality of NANO-Thermite

[blavatsky3]

@blite13 How does NIST avoid going to jail ? Avoid answering intelligent questions? Avoid talking about the presence of iron-rich microspheres which are known by-products of nanothermite reactions which produce temperatures capable of melting steel. If a covert military substance exists capable of effecting the controlled demolition of a steel reinforced Building and it is unknown to NIST then shouldn't they be taking steps to unravel the mystery.

[blavatsky3]

@blite13 B_ush and F_BI admit to e_xplosives at WTC on 9 -11

so why do they refuse to look for e_xplosives makes no sense to me unless you are trying to cover something big up

[blavatsky3]

Government knew Corrosion inside T_win T_owers and had to Fast-Track their

de-commissioning by 2007. NYC council forbid C_ontrolled D_emolition and the people who tendered the

corrosion and de-commissioning research have destroyed all their files and had people sign

forms saying they will never talk about this as per Thomas-Scott Gordon 1989

vv vv vv dot 911oz dot c om and search Thomas Scott Gordon

[Rsd79]

@a1d4a1m5

watch part 2, the answer is thermal expansion, where their is no need to reach melting point of steel like many truthers suggest.

[alecboi84]

piece of fucking non American shit......lying to us and trying to force that bullshit to the people of the United States is a crime......If anybody believes this fucking douchebag your a traitor to our country.....WAKE UP>>>>They slaughtered our people and have gotten away with it................

[JSSTyger]

"Why do you think that ASTM-E119 standard requires furnace temperatures of 2000 degrees during the test?"

Soil bearing capacity requirements for a one story building are typically around 3,000psf yet the weight carried may only be 1,000 to 1,500 psf. Concrete for column footings is around 3,000psi even though they may only be holding up a 5 ton column and a portion of a steel roof deck.

Test conditions DO NOT reflect real world conditions. They implement extreme factors of safety.

[moreaudan]

I hope this guy asked to be paid in gold.

[jizzmonger]

"Hey cameraman, are you an engineer? well I am, and let me tell"

Lying about being an engineer does lend anymore credence to your false statements anymore than being an actual engineer would.

[jizzmonger]

The "Heat Sink" argument is simply Truthers using buzzwords and talking points they have picked without having the slightest clue what they mean.

The the cross-sectional surface area of the steel in relation to the amount of surface area being heated is far to high for their to be any meaningful conduction.

"Heat Sinks" also require a temperature difference in order to actually give up heat.