Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945
Top Comments
All Comments (390)
-
Good thing it has subtitle on it.
-
ele éra apenas a pontinha de um iceberg que hoje ainda está representado de diversas formas de atuação talvez mais passiva como são os casos dos senhores pastores do dinheiro,politicos da roubalheiras ,etc..
-
You guys read so slow
-
Ohjeeah, exactly like it was with our article to JACS! :D
-
I just love this video. It does seem that the third reviewer is always an ass.
-
@TRBrownn I was able to read everything no problem.
-
I sympathize with THIS Hitler (not the real one).
Not in science, but in math: I've published in math successfully. My current paper under review came back with mixed reviews. But, the reviewers don't even criticize the half of my paper that *I* don't like. They criticize the GOOD part. They want me to waste time padding it out with exposition on other mathematicians' paper which are unnecessary for my theorem. Yes, related, but not necessary.
-
@Tartu100 Simple. Do not listen to the German text at the same time.
-
Der Untergang (a.k.a Downfall, 2004)
worth seeing, very good performances as you can see
-
Which movie did you use for the video?
Great piece however the text doesn't stay long enough to read without pausing. I suggest you do a few more experiments to determine the optimal length of time the text stays up. Following that work, resubmit to YouTube.
TRBrownn 1 year ago 163
This video is considered for publication after some major modifications:
1) The text should stay longer.
2) Some additional experiments (i.e. an according audio composition) would be very helpful. In this case the text issue can be disregarded.
3) The figures should be supported in a higher resolution ;-)
Kind regards,
Reviewer #3
heidafitz 10 months ago 38