The theistic argument that there must be an objective standard of morality is incoherent. That standard is made God's standard. God is a person, therefore God's subjective standard is the OBJECTIVE standard. This just disguises the fact that there is NO objective standard. Only God's supposed subjective standard.
To say subjective equals objective is logically incoherent.
This sophistry is a sleight of hand to elevate one subjective morality above others by claiming it as objective.

interesting debates

Very interesting

Thanks for uploading the D'Souza/Singer debates! =)

good posts...not everyboy has the dignity to do something that contributes to the other side of the discussion,d'souza really makes an effort to keep people away from his ideas,which is very valuable for atheists.

thanks 4 posting...
oh btw D'Souza sucks!! haha

Hiya. Just letting you know there's a couple videos missing from the Hitchens D'Souza debate. Three and five I think so far.

PLAYLISTS my dear sir

Perhaps you should put the debates in a playlist. Just a thought...

got bored of adding more debates?