Profile
Name:
Thomas
Channel Views:
80,820
Total Upload Views:
791,275
Age:
39
Joined:
May 22, 2010
Latest Activity:
14 hours ago
Subscribers:
8,825
Website:
About Me:
Hometown:
North Andover, MA
Country:
United States
Occupation:
Senior Fellow
Companies:
Ludwig von Mises Institute
Schools:
Harvard '94 (B.A., History),
Columbia '96, '97, '00 (M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D., History)
Interests:
American history, Austrian economics, Catholic liturgy, chess (if only I had time to play these days), and my family.
Music:
Jethro Tull, Yes, Pink Floyd, Genesis, Porcupine Tree, Blackfield, Marillion, and other music along those lines.
Recent Activity
|
|
TomWoodsTV uploaded a new video
Bestselling author Tom Woods responds to radio host Mark Levin's attack ...
more
|
|
|
|
TomWoodsTV uploaded a new video
Bestselling author Tom Woods takes on journalist Robert Parry's article ...
more
|
|
|
|
TomWoodsTV uploaded a new video
Guest host Tom Woods interviews Lew Rockwell and Kevin Gutzman (author o...
more
|
|
|
|
TomWoodsTV uploaded a new video
Two New York Times bestselling authors discuss U.S. foreign policy on th...
more
|
|
|
|
TomWoodsTV uploaded a new video
Tom Woods, bestselling author of How the Catholic Church Built Western C...
more
|
|
Subscribers
(8993)
Subscriptions
(1)
Channel Comments








I MADE A VIDEO OF THE CALL`S YOU GOT TO HEAR IT!!!!!!!!
IT IS POSTED ON MY CHANNEL IT`S CALLED MITT ROMNEY IS OBAMA.
YOU HAVE GOT TO HEAR IT AND I HOPE WE GET THE INFO OUT!!!
I disagree, good sir. I think Ron Paul easily did the best in the debate. I also think Santorum was shown for the unprincipled phony he is.
I do agree, however, that the venerable Mr. Paul could be more articulate, but one can almost always say "well he could have said this instead " Or " he could have put it a better way".
I, for one, wish he would be alittle more aggresive in hammering the warmongers who so happily supported the disaster in Iraq and are looking for "Iraq 2: With a Vengence!", namely, Iran.
Good night and God bless.
Your guest is correct in reference to the overuse and misinterpretation of the term 'conservative'. The entire political dynamic has descended into an 'identity politics' of sorts, with the terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' being thrown around and used so much, that they have become essentially meaningless, not to mention current policies that underpin the two terms have no basis in classic liberalism nor conservatism.
I am pleased also, that your guest recognizes the incongruity of neo-conservative positions on domestic policy, juxtaposed against foreign policy positions that are essentially the same in principle, while claiming that they're two separate and distinct entities.
There is a method to this I believe, and perhaps I can explain in another post.