Haters will make threats, show the truth, the threat follows
SlackerSlayer's Channel
Alert iconSubscribed
 
 
Sign in or sign up now!
Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Muzix
Fun
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
SlackerSlayer
Alert iconSubscribed
Loading...
Profile
 
Name:
Sam
Channel Views:
13,519
Total Upload Views:
357
Age:
51
Joined:
Jan 23, 2007
Latest Activity:
19 hours ago
Subscribers:
174
An honest look at our world and the everlasting hopes to fix what is wrong with it and it's various people.

We can expand into the stars if we stop thinking of others as brothers and more like cousins. Sometimes brothers can be their own worst enemy.
About Me:
 
-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:

END PROHIBITIONS NOW

The enumerated intoxicating Liquors right has been established in the 18th and 21st amendments of our Bill of Rights (BoR). Knowing that,

BoR-Nine "The enumeration in the constitution of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

So why is it intoxicating liquors the only legal intoxicant?

The way the language works is, well lets read it the way it is intended to be read.

BoR-9, The enumeration in the constitution of 'intoxicating liquors', shall not be construed to deny or disparage other 'intoxicants', which have been retained by the people.

How about intoxicating pills, smokes, injections, snuff, even non-alcoholic liquids, all are PROTECTED INTOXICANTs for all of the people not just drunks, if the Constitution is to be followed.

No more DEA telling people they are too early to pick up the next refill for their pain medication, after they just drove 20 miles to get there in a borrowed car to be turned away empty handed. What rights do they the government employees, have to do this to American citizens when to intoxicate is a certain right?

From leaked information decade after decade, the DEA and other alphabet-soup federal government agencies ARE THE DRUG SMUGGLERS and DEALERS into and across this nation. And they have the power to deny you your medication with the stroke of a computer keypad or a computer programs formula, even annonymous accusations you are out of bounds with??

All this gov intrusions when you really have the right to what ever intoxicant you want. So they have enumerated one version of an intoxicant alcohol. They can NOT go on disparaging and denying the rest to We The People, IF they are truely following the constitution and that government employees OATH to UPHOLD and DEFEND the same they each voluntarily took, with a hand on their Bible.

My first questioning of the war on drugs led me to think why was the worst drug ever known to man the only legal intoxicant out there? Was it another law respecting an establishment of religion because Jesus is said to have made some intoxicating liquor once in that story of the bible? Another reason to knock down this insane prohibition against the Citizens of this nation and the world. Is it just a 'pay to play' pain control system?


-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:
-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:


Stop respecting religions with laws and gov favors. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,,, bill of rights first thought of the first amendment.

How much respect would you call it if you have a huge tax bill but your next door neighbor didn't? But since they have claimed some special status because they teach a faith, they get to keep all of their money and you must make up that downfall? While the actual hard working YOU don't get any breaks for working hard and all they do is lie to people? Sickening isn't it.


-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:
-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:


That darn ole second ammendment thing. Yeah you know the second part of it, that makes the first part not only possible but make sense.

,,, The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

just makes too much common sense.

The first part has a stated goal and tool, militia and security of the state. The second part is how this is to be done. Three commas in that second amendment. Two sections with a goal and method to achieve that goal. Militia, security. Then Peoples right to keep and bear arms, SHALL NOT BE infringed. Shall is not a wishy-washy suggestion, it is a command.

Any law written restricting ownership, is a violation.

-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:
-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:


The fed bailout of A special failed business,,, what ever happened to a bad business failing because it deserved to fail? Remember the mantra of the corporate criminals, "What the market can bear" until they BREAK it.

Just THINK, the Bernie Madoffs are under the SEC's watchful eyes at all times folks. Working hard to protect you.

April 15th is coming up fast.
-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]-- Insideout job
-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:
Hometown:
San Diego
Country:
United States
Channel Comments
RonP2a0u1l2 (2 days ago)
hey buddy are you still kicking the racist nsupremacist jew's ass?
freddietz96 (5 days ago)
Sam, YT is going corporate as of 3/1/12. It's just being done to remind you whom you really answer to—and no, it's not these ideological friends you've accumulated here. "Larry Page, Eric Schmidt and Sergey Brin"—those are Google's chief execs; they are all CFR members and, together, they can (and do) control what's done on YT.

If you're like me, you go over to ZippCast. Only ZC's just 3 guys w/ some servers down in Georgia. They crash a lot—and over half their users are middle school kids. But I did set up a ZC channel in my YT name just to have...a channel that doesn't look exactly like the CFR's YT channel.
Freeplanet7000 (1 week ago)
Hellooo, sorrry what was that about liberal and 7 figure thing? i dont get it.
(comm on mel gibson and jews)
HorizonDelta (2 weeks ago)
Einstein was a cabaret-man rather tha a scientist, nothing of his Relativity has been ever demonstrated as now clearly appears, it was only a math-game (which we was obliged ro learn at Uni.), whereas a Genius such as Nikola Tesla (the Mozart of electriicty) was and is still erased from text books with all of his Truths about Nature and Energy.
HorizonDelta (2 weeks ago)
This to reply to yr. question about Einstein: since 1930's Tesla as well as other scientist claimed Relativity was wrong: this now begins to be understood after CERN superluminal neutrinos experiment demonstrated. Unfortunately. Einstein did not love Germany as he in his letter to US President in the 40's feared that Germany also had a "fat boy", which was obviously false. Relativity was a mass of errors. Pls also watch my vids ;-)
ucancallmeOh (3 weeks ago)
Thanks for leaving a comment on my video. I hope it sparks a battle.
You have a very interesting channel. I've read every word, "cousin" . Solidarity in TRUTH!
RobertFCrusader (3 weeks ago)
Like your channel
SlackerSlayer (3 weeks ago)
Knap is one of 'those' cowards, hiding their channel in a typical cowards hit n run. I wouldn't "fuck you" with Clintons cigar.
Knappermaus (4 weeks ago)
FUCK YOU
MsKABT (4 weeks ago)
Thank you Sam = have a great New Year, nice to be in touch. x
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more