When you make a finite measurement of time x length etc., you are actually creating a finite state not an infinite state. It is impossible to regress an infinite amount of finite things, since doing so you are using finite variables, finite measurements, finite partitions, finite dimensions, & finally finite space between two objects. Finite things have a beginning and end, whereas infinite do not. Finite things have a beginning singularity point, and "a second point is required" IN ORDER TO CREATE EXPANSION OF SPACE in between point A & point B, however infinite has NO BEGINNING = A point or END . Infinite entities are not confined by time, dimensions, length/lines via two contact points. So in essence, you cannot use anything that occurred after the Big Bang in order to explain infinite. You cannot traverse an infinite, an infinite number of finite things is a complete contradiction. You can have a theoretical infinite, but once you make a finite measurement of partitions, dimensions, & use finite relative variables, you will realize that there is no actual infinite size al all. When energy moves that creates kinetic energy, so the faster an object moves, the more energy it produces. Therefore, if I am moving fast on a bike, once I push the brakes, the kinetic energy "transforms" to heat via brakes. And then you have potential energy , which can be caused by height, so if I jump off a tree, my potential energy is transformed into kinetic energy as I'm falling. So, what is matter composed of ? Particles. So in order to find out what whether energy is composed of finite properties or infinite properties, we must dig deeper in this matter. Particles are subatomic entities, which can actually fit inside an area smaller than the size of the period at the end of this sentence. The 1st law statees that matter & energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it can only transform, i.e., change fromn one to the other,& this changing process produces a balanced state, which is equivallent to a 'net' of zero,i.e., nothing more & nothing less can be created. Now, we have reached a 'net' of zero, which implies that 'no movment', no increase no decrease, absolutely no more energy or matter can be created since that would require 'additional movement' which equals extra energy, which involves a process via "time x motion" equals extra length therefore extra movement equals extra energy required. Did this transformation process take place witin a finite or an infinite statek, considering it took place prior to the Big Bang? If the transformation & the "expansion process" of the universe can be proven to take place within a finite transition rather than an infinite state, then everything, i.e., the transformation, the expansion, & the material would be confined to a finite beginning state. Now, things against an infinite stte are the following examples, (1) This process could not have occurred within an infinite state, since "motion = movement & movements equals activity, therefore activity 'begins' with a +1 nano second time frame, which equals 'a beginning point." And since a 'line' requires 'two points' & space involved movement via distance 'between two points via objects', then both activities, i.e., transformation exchanged & the expansion of space between two points , are considered finite points since point A..to ..point B, have a beginning point from point A, and also has a second piont via "end" via point B. Remember, you need energy to create 'movement', & energy is a means of expressing how much work you have to do to basically get to something. It also uses finte time x finite length, however infinite has 'no beginnings', therefore no reference point , via Point A, and 'no ends' via Point B. Furthermore, if no points exists at all within an infinite state, no universe can expand within something that 'does not exist via point a and point b, remember, 'speace expands witing two points, not just one such as matter. If 'something' is created from a state of 'nothingess', then that is a violation of the 1st Law Of Thermydynamics. So, what caused the universe into existence from a state of 'nothingness?" Nothingness implies the absence of time, which implies 'zero time.' Something within 'nothingness had to create the first +1 particle. Black holes equals +1 particles, vacuums equals +1 particles, string theories equals +1 particles, and oscillating models etc., all consists of +1 particles. So, if I have an infinite amount of marbles and give you +1 marble, I will still have infinite amount of marbles. Infinite minus 1 equals infinite.The answer outside this universe must be 'infinite-eternal."
cj2Rr9qtE0E
