NonStampCollector
NonStampCollector's Channel
Alert iconSubscribed
 
 
Sign in or sign up now!
Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Objective Morality vs. Christianity
Noah's Ark (part 2 of 2)
Noah's Ark (part 1 of 2)
1 Corinthians 13
Genesis (take #2)
HITLER: THE ATHEIST (Quiz Show)
Genesis (take #1)
Challenge to Theists (short version)
Challenge to Theists
Yahweh's Amazing Miracle
Christianity Debate
Quiz Show (Bible Contradictions)
Context!!!!!!
The Eye of the Python
Special Investigation - Evolution
Atheists SECRETLY believe in Yahweh
Offensive!!!!!!!
Special Investigation - Atheist Alert
Special Investigation - 20th Century Killers
NSC store now open (you know you want it...)
High Stakes Intelligent Designing
Jephthah (Judges 11)
The Great Debate
What Would Jesus NOT Do?
Ode to Yahweh
A Personal Relationship with Jesus
Yahweh's Delicious Creation
What Would Yahweh Do?
Yahweh's Perfect Justice: PART 2
ATHEIST!!!!!!!
Free Will - "God Style" PART 3; Finale
Cooking with Yahweh
Free Will - "God Style" PART 2
Free Will - "God" style: a gift?
Funny Dawkins Interview (spoof edit)
A new religion. (but more of the same)
Ray Comfort meets the Evangelist's Nightmare
God's voice, Abraham, and child murder.
Atheism - How many gods do YOU not believe in?
God: Merciful? Maniac? Mass-Murderer?
How amazing is God's Forgiveness? Not very.
Forgiveness, Grace, and God's Death Sentence
Conversation with Yahweh
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
NonStampCollector
Alert iconSubscribed
Loading...
Profile
 
Channel Views:
1,090,877
Total Upload Views:
6,503,116
Joined:
Jul 9, 2008
Latest Activity:
2 days ago
Subscribers:
54,739
If atheism is a "religion",...
then Not Collecting Stamps is a "hobby".

If atheism is a "religion", ...
then Not Playing Football is a "sport".

If atheism is a "religion", ...
then 'OFF' is a "TV channel".

If atheism is a "religion", ...
then "Abstinence" is a "sex position".

If atheism is a "religion", ...
then "Dead" is a "lifestyle".

I now have a SECOND channel, for non-cartoons, and slightly different videos. NSC videos can take a long time, and I don't have as much time as I once did - so for everything else I've got to say, when I get around to saying it, please check out and SUBSCRIBE to NonStampChannel2.
http://www.youtube.com/user...
I'll make an official launch video some time soon.

@NonStampNSC on twitter

I have nothing to do with any "NonStampCollector" pages on facebook.
I don't have an NSC facebook page.
Just so you know; they're not me.

I don't do "friend requests" on youtube. I'm very friendly, though. Sometimes.

If you send me messages with no punctuation (and/or lazy spelling), I will be rude to you. Punctuation or G.T.F.O.

No, I do not, and will not, make videos about Islam. I don't know enough about it. I grew up with Christianity, so I know it. SO: the answer is "no", so please stop asking. No, that's the end, thank you, no, no, the end. No I will not. That's that. None. No videos about Islam. Further inquiries will be ignored. Sorry, I've been asked a few too many million times.
About Me:
 
I don't argue that "god" doesn't exist. I'm not concerned about proofs, or likelihoods, or probabilities, of there being a "God" or not. Actually, I lean towards there being some kind of a creative force, though I would not argue for that being the case, and I have absolutely no idea of the nature of what such a "force" might be.

I argue against the idea that the Bible has anything to do with truth in the areas of divinity or spirituality. The Bible is a demonstrably revolting and appalling piece of writing. It is morally redundant, and so full of murder, revenge, punishment, war, and bigotry that it amazes me that anyone can even mistake it for being in any way "holy".

I used to be a Christian, in very simple, middle-of-the-road churches in Australia, but over the course of many long, miserable years of questioning and doubting, managed to get free of it. I didn't do much about my atheism until I stumbled across Hitchens, Harris and Dawkins making the case AGAINST religion, and I realised the detrimental influence that Christianity has had, and continues to have in the world. I now believe that Christianity, and religion itself, is worth acting against.

Ken Ham tells his audiences that they HAVE TO believe in Genesis, because if the Old Testament is false, then it stands that the whole thing is false. This principle is perhaps the only truth he has ever uttered from the pulpit. Yes indeed, if the Bible is NOT the one and only, perfect, divinely inspired message from the creator of life and the universe, then the Christian religion tumbles in on itself.

I believe that the Bible is WOEFULLY inadequate in living up to a claim of "Divine Authorship", or even influence, and therefore that anyone who uses it as a focus of their life, or a source of "eternal" truths and ethics, is sorely misguided.

Through my videos, I hope to have people question whether the Bible is JUST SO GOOD, so PERFECT, so WISE, so ACCURATE, and that the character of Yahweh is so BEAUTIFUL, so LOVING, so JUST, that the text itself cannot have been written by human beings alone, without godly influence.

Indeed not. The Bible bears the stamp of its lowly origins - the imaginations of iron-age, superstitious, bloodthirsty war-mongers, determined to conquer and kill all the enemies they could, and all too willing to install fear and guilt into the hearts of their people, so as to more easily claim divine authority for unbelievable acts of cruelty and barbarism.

As for Jesus - yes, there's no doubt he is an amazing improvement upon Yahweh (except the minor detail about him announcing the eternal torture of the dead, which doesn't get mentioned in the Old Testament). But--- if Yahweh fails to meet the standard of being holy and perfect above anything an iron-age human mind could invent, then Christ's being the son of this imaginary character fails to be very meaningful. And besides, the best bits of what Jesus had to say were being said long before him, in places such as China and India (documented).


Do you find my videos offensive? Well, I'm offended that throughout history, and even still today, people have been, and are being, paralysed with fear of being condemned to an imaginary torture chamber after death- indoctrinated from childhood that they need to beg for mercy and forgiveness, and that nothing they can humanly do can save them from having endless pain and suffering inflicted on them for the crime of being born human.
I'm offended that people I know, love and respect have had these dishonest ideas put into their heads, and had it influence their choices ALL their lives, constantly weighing their thoughts and actions against the desire to please the imaginary master who alone can rescue them from the imaginary torture that He Himself threatens to dole out.

I'm offended that reasonable, ethical people are compelled to even try to square their beliefs about the holiness of the bible with its actual revolting contents, compromising the morality that is innate in them, with ideas like "Well, stoning people to death wasn't ALWAYS all that bad, it used to be actually holy... and murdering innocent children IS ok (and holy) in some contexts after all". WTF?

Make no mistake about it - your religion is EXTREMELY offensive; it is an insult to human dignity, and I look forward to its demise.

--------- HOUSE KEEPING ------------
I get too many comments to be able to read them all. I always read PMs and replies to my comments.
-----------------
House Rule:
I reserve the right to delete messages that contain appalling spelling and punctuation, yet are obviously written by native speakers who should know better.

This doesn't apply to apostrophe violations...
You're = you are.
Your = belonging to you.
Got it? Good.
... but that LOLcats/text message-style spelling?-- deleted the instant I fucking see it. No apologies.

Yes, I am narrow-minded about this, just like biologists are narrow-minded about creationism.
Country:
Australia
Recent Activity  
NonStampCollector commented on Tom and Zac's Assembly (2 days ago)
"@comedytoddler Teach me!"
 
 
NonStampCollector commented on Will Dawkins' Part in Reason Rally Be Supremely "Reasonab... (3 days ago)
"@Birdieupon If "Maximally Great Being" implies good - by what standard is it good? It's own? Whoop-di-doo. Then it must, by its own stand..."   more
 
 
NonStampCollector commented on Noah's Ark (part 2 of 2) (1 week ago)
"@rvt0777 Ah, I see you're well versed in what the big-bang theory is all about. You must have read up widely on it to come to that summary, because..."   more
 
 
NonStampCollector commented on John Cleese Carefully Considers Your Futile Comments (1 week ago)
"Bravo. If you put one of these out every day I'd watch them all."
 
 
NonStampCollector commented on The Ten Commandments- the basis of our laws and morals (1 week ago)
"@Tonestone420 Twisted - using nothing but (heavily referenced) bible verses."
 
Channel Comments
MulattoZygote (11 hours ago)
@Angelalynx999 What if a person had a circle that turned into a square? And then he said you maybe a square right now, but to me you will always be that circle that I remember you to be. Through this personal point of view, would you disagree with that person? If so, how dare you?
MulattoZygote (12 hours ago)
@Angelalynx999 I kind of gave you the last word when it comes to the circle being a square and vice versa. I see your point of view, but I don't want to be negated by it. I'll further argue for the sake of my vanity of not looking like I was stifled by you. The analogy of calling an adult the young person that he or she used to be is the circle that previously was. Now, you can argue that a shape changes into another and stays that way unlike comparing the commonality of humans from what they previously were in age to what they are now, but you still go with the notion of calling that person that "YOUNG" child. The young child is in the essence even when the person is clearly not young anymore, and you can disagree with me if you want.
zijnemajesteit (17 hours ago)
When I was a child I was religious. I was 12 or 13 when I saw the first contradiction in the bible. Then I started to see more and more... until I decided to be an atheist. You do a good job!
Angelalynx999 (1 day ago)
@MulattoZygote : I have no problem with alternative points of view when they are logically consistent. Yours is not.
I don't care about your point of view since it is specific to you and I am not you. What I care about is can you make an argument that is logically consistent and objective? So far that answer is no.
MulattoZygote (1 day ago)
@Angelalynx999 I know the science that you claim that refutes me. You've refuted nothing, and you are going down this close-minded rant that can't see validation in an alternative point of view. If you want to just disassociate with my point of view and not see any validation, fine.
Angelalynx999 (1 day ago)
@MulattoZygote : Your demonstrated points of view are subjective and therefore useless in the pursuit of the truth.
As for you messages, I answered them with science. That they completely destroy your assertions based on your extremely limited point of view is not my problem. As I maintain, I care about what is demonstrably true and what you have suggested is demonstrably false. So please, don't blame me for your failures.
MulattoZygote (1 day ago)
@Angelalynx999 Your bias seems to want to negate my alternative points of views. I know that we have come to terms on a disagreement with the circle and square concept that I stated, and whatever on that. But as for some of my messages, you seem to have taken me completely out of context and refuted nothing by doing so.
Angelalynx999 (1 day ago)
@MulattoZygote : Yes, my bias for what is true and demonstrable... And by technicalities I assume you mean science and logic. ;)
Perhaps you could state your intentions so we are all clear as to what they are.
MulattoZygote (1 day ago)
@Angelalynx Maybe you don't want a fight and you seem to think that I'm using flawed logic, but I say that you lack understanding and your "technicalities" just don't fit mine. Anyways, you haven't "refuted" anything that I've said when it comes to what I've intended my assertions to mean. I just let your so called "refutations" lie with your bias.
Angelalynx999 (1 day ago)
@MulattoZygote : If you don't want replies to your posts to NSC then you should have sent them in a PM. As for you arguments and analogies, they are logically flawed, which I pointed out to you. That you don't like the fact that your arguments are logically flawed is not my problem. Perhaps you should discuss them with someone closer to you who is versed in logic in order to work out the fundamental problems with them.
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more