NLP is best learnt with Igor Ledochowski where he had simplified it although, the applications to NLP is wast and not exactly listable. I check MysteryBoxs' channel rather often and I think the best argument against any religion is to ask them why are those people so desperate and unconfident. I take argument and confrontations as a sport and through time, I haven't seen a time someone won my arguments over religion. That said, it don't mean I should believe in arguing just because you can explain it rationally and if you do, you are religious even when every thing except "creationism" is debunked. The linguistic illusions and the sort used to make people happy about faith is best explained in NLP although, Richard Bandler is yet, to leave faith. Personally, I think its best to live life to the fullest than to bother about religion at least until they try to crusade and convert us.

Dude, cool stuff, I'm super interested in NLP, since I started watching some of Derren Browns stuff, Any ideas for books or something?

Hey MysteryBox! I read your reply and thought fine things about that. Just for the record, my favorite argument for atheism is quote "I have confidence in my self" unquote and after that as you see, there isn't a argument spark flame to me. I mean, what can you say to bother me? nothing! or bunk. Since, it allows me to not even argue the religion (which is not proven by the great night gown wearing homosexual as of yet beyond magic miracles and more importantly the rest of the nonsense) we are allowed even by the most blatant and faithful to laugh at them out of equal blatancy. For some time, I thought that there aren't atheists although now, there are only atheists, from the father the he cuts the churchiculer neck and A-damn-main. Mate, just for a comment, just go have fun and don't bother questioning, arguing or filimg your faith christian or otherwise.

I was born as a Buddhist and that is the best argument for a rational faith opposed to blatant claims requiring faith. That is, I reiterate (at least until they physically confront or leave the venue) what they say as budda. For example, its bad to not believe in budda as opposed to its bad to not believe in god. Sure, you can replace budda with everything else. I also, reply to confrontations ignorantly and unless the monotheist stop to continue I will command to get lost. Which can either make everyone to leave or as most desirably. I know, the worst part for rational faith is about having to argue it with a confrontational faith but, don't ever do nor have a argument for that ready since, who cares.

Great info you might enjoy on my channel.

jk yur 41 on youtube lol X-D do u have a life a girlfriend ik its not nun of mi bussnes u can reply if u wanna

how old r u i bet your 50-years old im right right??? awnser me biotch

"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God."
~ Epicurus

ur video are very interesting. subscribed :)

a fantastic effort by someone who values his intellect. i especially liked your video about pascal's wager, the numbers of people that are convinced by it just shows how powerfully religion can equate to intellectual treason.