Profile
Channel Views:
14,372
Joined:
May 20, 2007
Believing what you saw on 9/11, was like watching a magician perform, and believing that he was actually working magic simply because you were unable to determine how the illusion could have been created.
One of the laws of motion is known as equal and opposite reaction. There are many ways to explain what this means in simple terms. One such explanation is that a collision between a moving object and a stationary object would produce the same result regardless of which object is moving. Think about what would happen if the steel reinforced concrete tower were moving 500mph and struck the stationary aluminum fuselage of the plane. Logically, the aluminum plane should be smashed to smithereens. However, on 9/11 we were shown 757 sized holes through the steel columns and concrete floors and this is all we need to prove that the terrorist attacks were a hoax. The plane piercing through the side of that tower, is proportionate to a plane piercing through the sidewalk (making a big hole in the sidewalk) and then crashing into the subway trains below. The real terrorists were in Washington DC
Mass X Acceleration = Force, when an object exerts force on a second object, the second object exerts the same amount of force on the first object in the opposite direction. The force of the plane hitting the building, is equal to the force of the building hitting the plane. There should be equal and opposite reaction. There should be immediate deceleration. However, the speed of the plane can be determined with the visual evidence that we have, and the plane moves as fast through the superstructure, as it did through the air, seemingly disappearing through the side of the superstructure, and that is completely impossible. For it is a matter of density, and steel and concrete are many times greater in density than aluminum and fiberglass. In fact, our military tanks utilize tungsten plated ammunition, since tungsten has a very high density rating comparable to uranium and gold and is among the few types of alloys capable of penetrating steel and concrete at high speeds.
My instincts told me that this was a false flag operation, the first time I viewed the news footage and the first clip that I watched was the dive bomber footage on WCBS, but exactly how.it was done was more difficult to ascertain. This much we know:
On WNBC and WABC, the video signal from the helicopter was intercepted and superimposed was the image of a plane hitting the South Tower, this was done before the signal arrived to the television news studios. On CNN, everyone missed the second projectile, did not see or hear it coming. This indicates that the signal was intercepted after leaving the studio. The viewers at home were able to see the projectile while the anchors did not. CNN anchors then lied to us moments later saying they did see the plane (link below). Furthermore, WCBS had what is known as the dive bomber footage, the flight path differs greatly from what we see on other networks. It seems that there may have been separate parties controlling the televisual operation, and that there wasn't enough coordination between them to pass this most critical inspection.
People on the scene reported seeing a missile, which we can see in the initial live news coverage here (the video also contains an edit with some of the Naudet footage shown in slow motion):
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watc....
Then, desperate to avoid further reports of missiles, the media relied upon its own employees, and bystanders in Times Square that had watched the event on the giant television screen for the majority of the bogus eyewitness accounts we all had to endure.
Additionally, HERF technology, a process known as electromagnetic jamming, was used to make it impossible for any independent video camera to be operated within the area at which the missile could be positively identified.
Therefore, a relatively small number of conspirators within the military, the division of psychological warfare and the FBI, along with executive branch approval, would be all that is necessary to orchestrate the attacks of September 11
One of the laws of motion is known as equal and opposite reaction. There are many ways to explain what this means in simple terms. One such explanation is that a collision between a moving object and a stationary object would produce the same result regardless of which object is moving. Think about what would happen if the steel reinforced concrete tower were moving 500mph and struck the stationary aluminum fuselage of the plane. Logically, the aluminum plane should be smashed to smithereens. However, on 9/11 we were shown 757 sized holes through the steel columns and concrete floors and this is all we need to prove that the terrorist attacks were a hoax. The plane piercing through the side of that tower, is proportionate to a plane piercing through the sidewalk (making a big hole in the sidewalk) and then crashing into the subway trains below. The real terrorists were in Washington DC
Mass X Acceleration = Force, when an object exerts force on a second object, the second object exerts the same amount of force on the first object in the opposite direction. The force of the plane hitting the building, is equal to the force of the building hitting the plane. There should be equal and opposite reaction. There should be immediate deceleration. However, the speed of the plane can be determined with the visual evidence that we have, and the plane moves as fast through the superstructure, as it did through the air, seemingly disappearing through the side of the superstructure, and that is completely impossible. For it is a matter of density, and steel and concrete are many times greater in density than aluminum and fiberglass. In fact, our military tanks utilize tungsten plated ammunition, since tungsten has a very high density rating comparable to uranium and gold and is among the few types of alloys capable of penetrating steel and concrete at high speeds.
My instincts told me that this was a false flag operation, the first time I viewed the news footage and the first clip that I watched was the dive bomber footage on WCBS, but exactly how.it was done was more difficult to ascertain. This much we know:
On WNBC and WABC, the video signal from the helicopter was intercepted and superimposed was the image of a plane hitting the South Tower, this was done before the signal arrived to the television news studios. On CNN, everyone missed the second projectile, did not see or hear it coming. This indicates that the signal was intercepted after leaving the studio. The viewers at home were able to see the projectile while the anchors did not. CNN anchors then lied to us moments later saying they did see the plane (link below). Furthermore, WCBS had what is known as the dive bomber footage, the flight path differs greatly from what we see on other networks. It seems that there may have been separate parties controlling the televisual operation, and that there wasn't enough coordination between them to pass this most critical inspection.
People on the scene reported seeing a missile, which we can see in the initial live news coverage here (the video also contains an edit with some of the Naudet footage shown in slow motion):
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watc....
Then, desperate to avoid further reports of missiles, the media relied upon its own employees, and bystanders in Times Square that had watched the event on the giant television screen for the majority of the bogus eyewitness accounts we all had to endure.
Additionally, HERF technology, a process known as electromagnetic jamming, was used to make it impossible for any independent video camera to be operated within the area at which the missile could be positively identified.
Therefore, a relatively small number of conspirators within the military, the division of psychological warfare and the FBI, along with executive branch approval, would be all that is necessary to orchestrate the attacks of September 11
Interests:
Trolling trolls
Other interesting channels
Subscribers
(114)
Channel Comments





























today
1) Nanothermite (aka paint chips from PPG)
2) No flight 93 (despite 95% of plane debris recovered)
3) No flight 77 (even though over 130 witnesses saw a plane)
4) Marvin Bush WTC security (never happened)
5) Free fall speed (absolutely no building collapsed at freefall speed)
& Be sure to question EVERYTHING
Where are we going ?
WHY are we in this handbasket?