GnosticHumanist wrote:
This guy has just violated the most fundamental rule of logic: the person making the claim that something exists has the BURDEN OF PROOF on them.

No-one has a burden of proof in explaining how something DOESN'T exist.

Ie: I don't believe that a flying intergalactic space turtle made the universe, but Hindus do. It is NOT my onus to explain why there is no intergalactic space turtle, it is the onus of the person CLAIMING there's an intergalactic space turtle.

> You fail to notice I am just asking questions. That bears no burden of proof. You are just whining because you can't answer the questions in a way that supports atheism. As discussions progress and I do make statements, I am prepared to give evidence to support them. Anyone can read this who looks at the comments with responses from me.

XDlolzilla wrote:
I truly hope you get cancer or some horrible disease and die old man. Preferably in a slow and very, very painful way. The world doesn't need more idiotic, brainless people like you

>Way to go showing how reasonable and well reasoned the atheist position is.

Great channel. One of the few people interested in honest debate.

Great ministry! You are a great theological debater. I pray for teachable hearts and conviction of His Holy Spirit to dwell in each thought and truth spoken for the glory of His kingdom. Amen!

Cootabux wrote:
Your 10 questions for atheists are antiquated and have been answered in detail, most efficiently.
Please go to Talk Origins dot org and simply look them up. All your your questions, and Creationist's questions, have been answered.

Now I have 1 and only 1 question for you. In Math & Mark, jesus tells his followers that he will return (2nd coming) with their lifetimes, within their generation (40 yrs)! In others words, JC planned his return for 2K yrs ago!
If u don't think those verses are accurate, explain?

>If you think there are adequate answers to my questions, bring them and stand behind them yourself. I don't take answers by referral or proxy.

>What if I merely said your objection has been answered many times by others? You haven't read the bible and yet you think you can give valid interpretations. You are choosing only one interpretation of those passages and only because you feel you can parlay that into a biblical problem.

mustxgetxout wrote:
imagine a force holding things together manipulating the world some cells attracting to one another then being bound millions billions trillions ect..years growing changing manipulating into one thing then another this force of attraction keeping cells together that fit together and cells that don't fit together sepera...te therefore establishing a universe that is blanced and completely capable of sustaining life

>You clearly have a lack of understanding of the physical world and universe. It's not a cartoon. You should do your homework before commenting again so you don't look so foolish.

mustxgetxout wrote:
ok so i couldn't comment on you 10 questions for athiest so im commenting ur page being athiest just means you don't believe in god and not only do i personally not believe in god but i don't believe in anything any idea i have concerning anything im fine with leaving it as a theory there is no reason to believe in god no prove or logical way to really rationalize it at least not the god in religion but i don't excluse any posibility i just consider what is most reasonable by my observation of the world...

>From what I can decipher of your meaning you are agnostic. The question that occurs to me is how much serious looking into the questions have you done. Listening to opinions of others on MTV or the Comedy Channel doesn't count.

theburningattack wrote:
If it's logical to say that God doesn't need a beginning, then it's equally logical to say the universe doesn't require a beginning.

>Not so fast. It is clear from science that the universe had a beginning about 14bya. It is clear from logic that there must be a self existing first cause because you cannot have an infinite regression of causes and you cannot get something from nothing.

alianchild wrote:
I know your " questions " have been answered. Even the logically fallacious ones. Time for you to be honest and admit it. Or are you dishonest as well as delusional?

>You are correct in assuming many have sought to answer my questions and still do but you are totally wrong in thinking anyone has given workable answers to those that challenge atheism, evolution, or abiogenesis. The other questions are more about attitude and do not necessarily have right answers.

So your challenge is to supply good answers to any of the first 8. Should be no problem since you are convinced they have been answered well before.

in response to your argument that god is good even though he slatures hundreds , yes we cheered when the death star was destroyed but would you not cheer if sateen was destroyed and all those in hell as well . I am 14 I am an atheist son of a christen and a jew I have seen many arguments in my short life about religion it is illogical and unsensical . We all want the answers the best way to receive them is through reason , logic, and facts . If god exist and if rapture comes then before his judgment my argument will be "you gave me no proof and no reason to belive you existed hopes and anbistions often fell astray you gave untold suffering even though you are the mightiest of beings you could of cured all illness and sorrow but instead you let it rain as the driving fore behind our daily lives."