 Good morning and welcome to the second meeting of the power of enchafry Advantage Commission Scotland Bill Committee in 2018. The only item on the agenda today is to consider a recent written submission from the promoters of the bill following the oral evidence session at our last meeting on 24 January 2018. Members will recall that at the last meeting on 24 January, the promoters acknowledged that the land plans submitted by them when the bill was lodged or not accurate. Those plans fundamentally underpin the bill by showing the benefited land and therefore who should pay towards the upkeep of the power and it is therefore critical that they are as accurate as possible. The meeting clarified two possible options for next steps. The first was that the promoters would commission saffles to redraw the land plans using all of the available information plans from 1846 and 1848 and two books of reference and valuation from 1847 and 1851. The promoters also stated that they would try to gain access to a plan from 1851, which they had not seen but which was held by the national records of Scotland. The second option was that a complete new reassessment of the land be undertaken and the promoters were going to meet with the Association of Drainage Authorities to explore the viability of that option further. The promoters stated that they would write to the committee once they had decided which option they wished to pursue. We have now had a written submission from the promoters, which confirms that following the meeting with the ADA, they have concluded that the second option would be prohibitively expensive and unnecessary, and that the best way forward would be the first option, but saffles would be commissioned to redraw the land plans based on all the available information. The submission includes a note of the meeting with the ADA, as well as a memo from Johnny Willet at Savles, which confirms that the 1851 plan, which is actually from 1850, has now been accessed and can be used in the preparation of the new plans. The submission also comments on the dollar land issues and asks the committee for a view and confirms that the promoters are content for the bill to be amended to allow up to three Balgawn section commissioners, giving a total of nine commissioners and a quorum of five. Further, the RPI is the proposed index for linking the budget in terms of the right to appeal and index-linked annual budget in excess of £60,000. The committee will now turn to address the points set out in the paper. First, I will ask whether the committee has any views on the promoters proceeding as proposed in commissioning, saffles to redraw the land plans based on the available plans and books of reference. I think that that is a very positive way to go and to move that forward. Are we content to invite the promoters to submit the new plans and explanatory report to the committee, if possible, by 6 April, which will allow time for preparation? Regarding the committee paper notes to invite the promoters to submit in the explanatory report the new plans with the details as listed on the floor, are we content? Regarding the issue of the dollarary lands, it would be my opinion that it is not for the committee to make a determination on that issue, but for the promoters. Do any members wish to comment? On the promoters' willingness to allow for free Balgawn section commissioners, does the committee have any views? It is a sensible way forward, and it is what the residents have asked for, so it is a good approach. Regarding the promoters' intention to use RPI to index, link the budget for the purposes of an individual right to appeal an annual budget in excess of £60,000. Are there any other matters that the committee wishes to discuss in relation to the new plan? I thank members for attending today. The clerk will communicate the outcomes to the promoters. The next meeting will be determined in due course and communicated on the Parliament's website. The next meeting will be to consider the new land plans and the accompanying draft report.