 I think it's interesting I think a lot of people just kind of assumed with Matt Ryan's contract that you know this is going to be a situation where they were not going to be in the quarterback market and I still believe that you know as they do that he still has good football left in him I just I question the opportunity you're going to have in the near future picking where they're picking to be able to land the successor to get somebody that's going to you know solve that position for a decade plus so to me I think the opportunity right there for them to take a quarterback it would be too difficult for them to pass up and then it comes down to which quarterback do you want and in the scenario of this mock draft it's really a decision between Justin Fields and Trey Lance I know a lot of folks will say oh gosh bring Justin Fields back home that makes the most sense and off you go and maybe not as familiar with Trey Lance having not watched a lot of North Dakota state football but to me Trey I think both these guys have tremendous ability but Trey gets a little bit of the nod for me just in terms of decision making protecting the football and I think both guys offer a lot in terms of expanding your playbook with their athleticism so to me I don't know that there's a wrong pick between the two but this is why I had them go with Trey Lance and the other big decision here is say the Terry Fauno in his first draft the Falcons has come out and said that he abides by the best player available approach which is different than previous drafts because previous general manager was more focused on needs as we've seen the last couple of years but that's what makes this an interesting situation for the Falcons because say there when pick four comes around if that third quarterback or I guess that would be the fourth quarterback isn't the best player on their board and say you know Kyle Pitts is how do you weigh the value of hoping that you're not picking in the top five anytime soon but you've also come out and said you believe in best player available. Yeah that's a challenge and I think everybody you know likes to give a lip service to that but at the end of the day there's a hierarchy when it comes to the positions and you know if I need you know a tackle a corner and a pass rusher then I'm good with taking the best player available. When I don't know who's going to be the quarterback for my football team you know within a couple years and that could be a decade long trek through the wilderness to find the next guy to me that trumps everything so I have Kyle Pitts as the second player in the draft the only quarterback I have ahead of him is Trevor Lawrence who's going to be the first pick in the draft so if I'm going to go purely off-need individually I'm taking Kyle Pitts with the fourth pick but to me I would take a good quarterback over a great tight end every day of the week because it's going to impact your team not only in a bigger way in a year or two years you're talking about is Matt look how long Matt's been there you're going to have a chance to have that position splitified for a decade plus that would be too difficult for me to pass up.