 You already mentioned earlier the role of companies that I think merits a lot more scrutiny, both of the companies based in the U.S. or Europe, for example, that don't appear to have due diligence strategies in place to even assess whether they might be contributing to or otherwise enabling human rights violations. Do all of the manufacturers out there know who's making their products in Xinjiang? Do they know who their partners are, whether those are government or security apparatus partners? Those are important questions. Similarly, we've written a lot about some of the big Chinese tech companies and their involvement in repression in Xinjiang. They're investing all over the world. And I think, again, there's a real discussion to be had amongst governments and publics about whether it is appropriate to let companies who are responsible for serious human rights violations or who are implicated in serious human rights violations inside China provide data and other kinds of service technology beyond China's borders. Those are not the companies that I want handling my data.