 I was reading the Australian, and there was this op-ed piece by Morris Newman in there, which essentially was going through a series of arguments of why climate was bad. And ultimately, I will give Morris Newman the benefit out. He comes to the point and says, scientists are immoral lying people who cannot be trusted. So that's what it comes down to. If you don't want to believe in climate change, you have to really believe that there's a grand scheme of scientists around the world with our $75,000-year salaries and 12 years of education behind us who are just trying to scheme the rest of the world for grants. But as part of it, he said, well, essentially use the argument of one of the most prominent scientists and said, show me the money, who's taken bets that the world will not be colder in 20 years? And so I landed, I called up the Australian and said I would like to put an op-ed in tomorrow's paper and I'm prepared to take Morris Newman's bet. So I pointed out exactly why I was prepared to take the bet and that it's hard to get a good return on your money and this looked like pretty easy money to me. And that, sure, $10,000 was a lot of money to me, but not much to him. And let's have it on and he can even invest the money. That's what his area of expertise is. So I have not had a formal response from him. I did have a sneer across the room once, but that's the only time I've actually ever met him. He claimed it was a misunderstanding of not actually wanting a bet, but I should say that if he or anyone of his type of public position wants to take the bet, there's me and probably a hundred other scientists are happy to, you know, you want to put a million down, I think I can raise a million dollars and, you know, $10 million, probably do that too. It's not, well, as I said, it seems to me like essentially taking someone's money that bet was. So I haven't taken Morris Newman's money because I think he showed why he's a businessman. In the end, you know, he wasn't prepared to put his money where his mouth was.