 Thank you, Jason. Another great presentation where we really get to drill down to a much more local level and see this, see these case studies and see what the impact is and some of those levers that Jason was describing being able to pull. Now, we are over time but I just, we can't have a session like this without having a few questions. Would anyone like to ask a question of any of the panel? Yes, sir. I don't know that there's a sort of a study which has actually assessed that but one of the things I'd say is that, for example, Jason put up a graph there which was the difference between rainfall and potential evaporation. So it's rainfall minus Pt and that was going down in all of those different climate models. And that's going to be a key drive for both surface water and of groundwater recharge. And so under those scenarios, on average, the groundwater is going to go down so the groundwater access. The offsetting factor there is that as rainfall intensity tends to increase and extreme rainfall increase, so, you know, sort of wetter years becoming, you know, wetter and so as well as the dry is getting drier, those wet years are really fundamental to groundwater recharge. So it's actually the balance between those two things, an average drying and those extreme events. And I think the outcome of that will be very, very localised. So in some regions, that will be increased groundwater in quite a few, I suspect, reduced. The implications for accessing that ground water, I think that's something which we'll just have to play by ear because I think these issues will pop up again. I mean they need to be addressed now, but they'll probably increasingly need to be addressed just like surface water and the arrangements associated with that will need to be continuously revisited as these futures that Jason was talking about come through. Yes, please. Yeah, look, I'll probably just mention one and actually Barnaby Joyce mentioned it and he was opening address yesterday. It was increase in farm management deposits. I think when you look at, this is about sort of broadly about risk management, then obviously having a greater capacity to invest, to actually even out some of those income fluctuations is really important. And probably one of the good things about farm management deposits, at least compared to insurances, if you don't use it, you haven't actually lost anything, it's actually sitting there in a bank. So I think those are really quite a positive move in terms of sort of risk management and encouraging people to actually prepare for change and support themselves. So that's about to be one, one sort of policy option and odds and nominators being very positive on the adaptation front. I'll just throw another one in. I think that's a good suggestion and another one is in relation to R&D. So analysis including by A-Bears by Neil Hughes up the back there has shown long-term changes in the total factor productivity. Essentially that's the increase in efficiency of production over time in agriculture, apart from the last decade or so where it actually started to go instead of going up, it was going down. And a lot of that's actually driven by climate influences and at the same time we've actually had lower and lower R&D expenditure and there's a long-term consequence of R&D expenditure and that's reduced total factor productivity and that happens in Australia and the rest of the world. So one of the key things we need to do is keep on providing effective R&D in terms of the amount, but also the mechanisms to distribute that and target that. One last question, anyone? Because I'm dying to ask one. Just very, very quickly, over 30 years been talking to farmers about these sorts of issues and by their very nature optimistic about what they do and really keen observers of what happens and they talk about the variability of climate and accept that as being a given. Do you now have a sense that there is growing acceptance amongst the agricultural community that what we've been looking at here today is absolutely happening and that they're going to have to adapt? Do you get any sense of that Mark in your work? I'll pick this up. I've actually done analyses of survey responses from farmers and so pulled it in from different surveys and the message here is that the stated views of farmers in surveys are much more skeptical of climate change than the public average. In fact it's about twice as many people say it's not happening or it's not happening. It's not due to humans compared with the Australian population average. So the public face of farmers is very much essentially let's deal with climate variability, climate change is something we don't want to deal with. In reality when they actually start to look at the changes in the practice changes that farmers have done it is actually saying that the climate is changing because the things that they are doing are things that are in response to those changes in climate that they're seeing and so between sort of 75% and 80% depending on survey of farmers actually doing the sorts of adaptation practices that they would do if they believed in climate change or said they believed in climate change. So there's this difference between the stated views and the actions that they're taking and so you need to be very careful about how you interpret the things that are coming out of the farming community in that respect. In contrast the peak body, NFF have been consistent for a long time in saying that climate change is one of the big issues facing the industry and so again you're getting a different view depending on whether it's an individual farmer or a peak body and the sort of issues that they're dealing with. Thank you that's a really interesting answer Mark. I will draw a line here because it is lunchtime I'm sure you're all very keen to have a feed but this has been a brilliant session. Could you please thank Joel, listen B, Mark Howden and Jason Crane for their very engaging presentations.