 If you had the chance to make any trade right now, who would you trade for? Why does it seem like Terrell Suggs has beef with Lamar Jackson? If rookie Eman Marshall becomes dominant, should the Ravens get rid of Brandon Carr? How will Ravens' left tackle Ronnie Stanley match up when Terrell Suggs comes into town? This and more on NFL Question from Subscribers. YouTube, Team Keep It Clean, what is going on? It's Team Raven here with another video on another episode of NFL Questions from Subscribers. This is a series where you can ask me any NFL question you want to based off of any NFL team and we answer it in a video just like this. If you want to be part of NFL Questions from Subscribers, you just send me a DM on Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, Facebook or if you don't have either one of those, you can send me an email at teamkeepitclean at gmail.com and we'll answer your question in a video. Without wasting any time, let's get straight into it. First questions came from a boy, Enonic. He said, in grading, my question came to me after seeing the numerous discussions regarding QB evaluations in this year's draft. You say you don't think the Ravens will be a playoff team this year? And I hope you're wrong. Hey, trust me, I hope I'm wrong too. He said, I was comparing Lamar to another first round quarterback picked from about 15 years ago. Kyle. He said, I remember Kyle Bollard being booed on what seems like it was every other play. He was Brian Billick's guy and he was in Baltimore from 2003 to 2007, finishing 21 and 19 before leaving. So 21 wins, 19 losses. So a little over 500. So shout out to that. He said, my two questions are, if the Ravens are less than a 500 team this season, so meaning they would be seven and nine or lower. Do you think they will be as patient as they were with Kyle Bollard and give Lamar time and the tools that he needs to be a successful NFL quarterback? Or do you think he's on a shorter leash due to his style of play and the vast number of offensive moves made by all the other teams in the AFC North? Look forward to your response. Love the channel. Keep up the good work and you keep up the great questions because e9 always come through with some fire questions. So that's a real good one too. If the Ravens are less than a 500 team, do you think they'll be as patient with Lamar Jackson as they were with Kyle Bollard in 2003 to 2007? I don't know because team's patience is a lot shorter these days than it used to be. Now with Lamar Jackson, I think it won't be necessarily a... I don't think it'll really depend on the record. I think it'll depend on him because there have been times and there have been teams where the quarterback will be playing so good, be playing lights out. But the defense can't hold the lead and then that makes everything that the quarterback did in vain because they end up losing. So I think not to say Lamar's going to be playing lights out. We hope that he does. That'd be great. But I think it just all depends on how Lamar is playing. If the Ravens are winning because of him, great. If the Ravens are winning in spite of him, then there'll be some question marks. And I think, obviously, winning trumps everything. Like I said, plenty of times over the years, winning makes... it covers up a lot of mistakes, just like love covers a lot of things too. But winning covers up a lot of mistakes. And when you're winning, people... they don't look at a lot of the bad stuff that you're doing. They don't look at the rough part of the team. They don't look at the negative part of the team. They don't look at the bad part of the team. They're just like, hey, we're winning. So what? That guy dropped six passes in this game. We still won. So what? This linebacker missed seven tackles in this game. We still won. So what? Our quarterback I said three times in the offensive line is letting everybody get through. We still won. Winning makes people forget a lot of what's going on. So I think it's just so many factors that part of the whole equation of the Ravens themselves. And I think it just depends on so much on if they're going to be patient with him or not. If he's absolutely just really playing so bad, and there's absolutely no improvement, I think that he would have at least a year and a half. I think he would have a year and a half. This entire year and then next year, I think next year there will be a possibility of looking at a replacement. Now with how Lamar Jackson seems to work and his work ethic, just how he just seems to be somebody that just really wants to really get better. And he put in work in the offseason like crazy. And that's only from what we've seen. We've only seen this stuff that he social media don't tell the whole story. So he could have been putting in even more work. But who knows? But hopefully that all translate to the field this year. So I don't see him bombing out. I don't see him just being the next Kyle Buller. But hey, you never know. But as far as patience with the Ravens, I think it just all depends on how they get to that point where they have to make a decision like, oh, is this really our guy? Or should we go ahead and move on? So if Lamar is like downright playing just awful, then I say about a year and a half. So a real good question. And for your other question, let me not forget it. He said, do you think he's on a shorter leash due to his style of play and the vast number of offensive moves made by all of the other teams in the AFC North? I think his style of play could actually extend his leash because the game is faster, the game is quicker. And I know it's going to be somebody who says, oh, well, he's doing all that running around. He can get hurt. It's no guarantee for anybody whether you, if it's a quarterback that runs around more, that he can get hurt more. I know people point out Michael Vick, but you look at, look at, look at Carson Wentz. He stays hurt. He don't run around that much. Look at, um, what's his name? Marcus Marriota. He can move, but he ain't moving around like that. Brady towards ACL right there, sitting in the pocket. Um, plenty of quarterbacks have gotten hurt right there, sitting in the pocket. So it's almost like the, your legs can, if you can't move like that, it can almost be the curse too. Like they haven't, and having fast legs, that's could be a gift in a curse. It just depends on how you use. So it's no, like nothing set in stone for, oh, if he runs around, he got a high risk of getting hurt. He could be avoiding tackles, avoiding. I mean, we saw it's plenty of times last year, uh, where he would avoid tackles in the pocket and around the pocket in the backfield and all that. So he saved himself. Had he not been able to run, boom, he, he would have been out. So anyway, these are some real good questions as usual. Shout out to E9. Next question came from a guy, see Pellish. He said, what does it say about Ozzie Newsom? If Eric D'Costa is able to finally find the answer at wide receiver in the draft with either Hollywood Brown or Miles Boykin, all respect to the gold Ozzie Newsom. But does that mean D'Costa has a step on Ozzie? Not necessarily. It just means that Eric D'Costa was sitting there waiting and watching and seeing everything that didn't work with the wide receiver position. So he's trying to do it differently. He's already done it much differently than Ozzie Newsom ever has. But he's been in the background watching how Ozzie Newsom has operated. Doesn't mean he has a step on Ozzie Newsom. It's too early to tell. But if he does get it right at wide receiver, he will have learned from Ozzie Newsom's mistakes. Next question came from a boy, Jeff Boom. He said, first off, love the videos. Appreciate that. Appreciate you even watching it. He said, but if you had a chance to be the Ravens GM, to make a realistic trade, who would you trade off the team? And who would you get from any team? Wow. He said a realistic trade. Oh, wow, that's a realistic, not to even keep it clean for right there. A realistic trade for anybody. But, oh man, I think I would give up Maurice Kennedy, Kenneth Dixon, and a second and third round pick, only because he's a little older now, for Von Miller. Even a second, third, and fourth. And you know what? I would even give up a first. Not a first and all of that. A first and Maurice Kennedy and Kenneth Dixon for Von Miller. And a draft pick in return too, like a third or a fourth. They probably give up a fourth though. So yeah, a first and Maurice Kennedy and Kenneth Dixon for Von Miller and a fourth round pick. That's what I would give up, because it would give us a dominant pass rush of somebody who has made plenty of plays and still got plenty more plays to make. And that would really help us just recoup that loss of Terrell Suggs. So Von Miller would be the guy. Next question came from a boy ASAP Block. He said, do you think we should re-sign Michael Crabtree? No, no, no, let the young guys play. Next question came from a boy HazyTV. He said, what do you think about this match up this year between Terrell Sugg vs. Ronnie Stanley? Who will win this battle in the trenches? This is where we need Ronnie Stanley to man up and show that he got more strength than Suggs. He needs to make Suggs look like an old, tired, winded man. He is going to be facing a very tough Terrell Suggs, because we as Ravens fans know, especially recently, Terrell Suggs is at his best at the very beginning of the season. Toward the end of the season, he kind of starts getting really winded and whatnot. But at the beginning, he is usually on fire. So Ronnie Stanley is going to have to be on point. He's going to need to hit the weight room a little extra hard. He is going to need to just be super tough that game. You know, Terrell Sugg is going to talk to that trash. He's going to try to get in his head every way possible, shape, form, whatever. He's going to try. He's going to try to mess with Ronnie Stanley and mess him up. But it's up to Ronnie Stanley to show like, this dude don't phase me. He don't phase me. I ain't worried about it. And we need Ronnie Stanley to knock him on his butt, knock him on his butt, and really hold down that left side. Protect your quarterback. Lamar Jackson going to do some running around too. And we just, I want him to run right past, I want him to shake Terrell Sugg a couple of times too. You know, even if it's just one good time, man, I want him to shake him. So that would be very satisfying for Ravens fans. So that would be great. So yeah, but who will win? Terrell Sugg, he's going to get his on Ronnie Stanley as far as just pure strength, because he got that old man strength. But hopefully Ronnie Stanley will have that young bull strength and just be able to knock him on his behind. I think overall on the matchup, it'll go to Ronnie Stanley, but Terrell Sugg is definitely going to get his too. Where he just straight bull rushes this dude, or maybe just get around him a little bit. Ronnie Stanley, I think is going to is quicker than Terrell Sugg at this point in their careers. And Ronnie Stanley may be a little bit stronger. Terrell Sugg's got that experience though. He got that experience and in the, I don't want to say street smarts, but the football smarts. So that's going to help him out a ton. But I say Ronnie Stanley wins the war. It's going to be a couple battles here and then. Sugg's going to win some and Ronnie Stanley going to win some too. But I think overall Ronnie Stanley, he's going to win that matchup. Next question came from my boy Mr. Marr. He said, why does Suggs have beef with Lamar Jackson? Well, I think it's one of those things. I don't even know if it's really a beef, but it does seem like he got a problem with it. But I think it's one of those things where it's like, man, my boy got passed up. He lost his opportunity to you. I ain't feeling that. And Terrell Suggs even was was petty Suggs during the season when they asked him about the whole QB situation. And he said, this how petty he was. He didn't even say Joe Flacco's name. He just said, we got a Super Bowl MVP quarterback that should be starting. Well, I was like, wow, okay. He really said that and doing the season too. And he's supposed to be a leader. He's supposed to be one of the Ravens. And I was like, wow, I just okay, cool. So I think it's just it's more so that he he just wasn't feeling that what happened with Flacco. And it happens. That's how most quarterbacks lose their job. Anyway, they lose it. Well, I mean, a lot of them lose it from bad poor play. But Flacco lost it from a combination of poor play and getting hurt at the worst time. So I mean, it's no good time to get hurt. But Flacco got hurt at the worst time. And boom, that was it. Next question also came from my boy, Mr. Moore. He said, do you think if even Marshall has a very dominant preseason against good receivers, we should trade Brandon Carr? No, no, because they already branded cars already on a hook for the salary cap. So no, ain't no trading branded car this year. Um, with Brandon Carr, he and he's a he's a he's a starter. He's a starter. And I do not I can't trust Jimmy Smith. Love Jimmy Smith. Love his plate. I can't trust him though. It's been too many years of the injuries. And now the suspensions over the past two years and injuries over the past two years too. But I can't can't trust him yet, man. Well, can't trust him at all. I mean, we'll never be able to trust him because he's like 30 something now. I think he's 30. Is he 30 or 31? I forgot how old he is. But he's getting older and he's been injured a lot, like a lot, a lot. And if you if he goes down, we do have we would still have Avery, Kennedy for now. Um, even Marshall, uh, Tavon Young, but he's a slot guy, of course, more than Humphrey. I'm just thinking the guys who are feeling for Jimmy Smith on it on the outside at outside corner. Um, Cyrus Jones for now. Um, I don't think you're feeling the outside corner. But still, those are the guys that we got on the team. So with that being said, uh, no, we can't we can't trade Brandon Carr right now, even if uh, even Marshall does good against good receivers. I don't think he'll even get to go against many good receivers. We'll see though. But no, we can't we can't afford to take that risk. This question came from a boy Richard opp. He said, I asked this question before, but I think it's worth asking again. After the heat of the draft finally dying down, what were the record of each team in the AFC North B? Um, I actually did a stream with my boy Joe Newball, my guy, uh, SCG Sports Sonny. Um, and we went over this, we went over this and it's funny. I wasn't even paying attention before the season. I mean, before the draft, I predicted the Ravens go nine and seven. After the draft, I said, I'll revisit it. And then we end in the stream last night. Last night as of today, when you see this video, I don't know. It's definitely not going to be last night. But anyway, last night in the stream, um, that wasn't even paying attention, wasn't even looking at anything that I said before, but we went through all the games and they would tally it up what the records were going to be, what we each picked and mine came out to be nine and seven again. Um, but what I said for the Ravens is that I expect them nine and seven if the offense is good, I expect 10 and six if the offense is great than 11 and five. Um, so hopefully the offense can be great because I think so much of this season depends on them. I think the defense will be fine. It could be one of the things where they end up surprising us and the defense ain't that good, but the offense is a lot better. So we'll see. But right now I would say nine and seven. Like I said, but if the offense is good, 10 and six of offense great, 11 and five. Um, Steelers, um, I think I put a seven and nine, Browns I put 10 and six, and the Bengals, I think I put like six and 10, something like that. Um, I just think, I think things are going to be pretty close though throughout. I think things are going to be pretty close throughout the season. Um, but then it's just, it's just a lot of wild stuff in there, man. It's a lot of wild games in there. It's going to be fun as usual, but that's, that's my record predictions for now. Next question came from a guy slick Ravens. He said, what's up man? I got two questions. First off, let me say I'm a Lamar Jackson fan, but what if Trace McSawley actually passes better and runs the offense better than Lamar Jackson? What do you think the Ravens will do? I don't think they'll even give Trace McSawley a chance to compete with Lamar Jackson for that role. So I don't even think the Ravens would or us fan period would have anything to worry about with that. Any QB controversy because he's not going to get a chance to run with the ones because that's going to be Lamar. They're going to want to get this dude as many reps as he can possibly get because they know that how the passing was an issue. It was an issue last year, but just really the consistency of the passing was an issue last year. So I don't even think Trace McSawley is going to get that opportunity. Like, like the whole, like that six, nine thing, which I'm not even going to let you get the chance. The Ravens are not going to let him get the chance at all. And the second question was, I know it's too early to tell, but who do you think will actually start a wide receiver this year? Oh, that is all over the place. Who will start a wide receiver this year? Based off of right now, I would say Chris Moore and Hollywood Brown and then Willie Snead in a slot. That's what I would, that's what I would pick right now who will start a wide receiver. So Chris Moore, Hollywood Brown, the two outside wide receivers, and then Willie Snead in the slot. So real good question.