 Brexit was a great opportunity for the UK to basically abandon the regulatory regime of the European Union and to eliminate regulation. It could also be an opportunity to set up the UK as a free trade island and get away from the immigration restrictions that the trade restrictions that the European Union had put in place. And some of the supporters of Brexit, those are the arguments they made that it's about getting rid of regulation, it's about increasing trade, it's about all these things. Now Brexit has happened, Brexit has happened. And then we sit here and continue to wait for all the good stuff to happen that was promised as a result of Brexit, getting rid of all the European regulations, establishing free trade policies. There being some movement of free trade, I mean the UK did what I think the United States didn't do under Trump, which is join a free trade deal in the Pacific Ocean. One of the massive mistakes of the Trump administration was rejecting a top. The UK has joined a top or something similar at the top. But generally, it still hasn't lived up to its promise of free trade island. And then on top of that, when the current Prime Minister, Sunak of UK came in, he promised, and actually the Conservatives passed a law that said that by the end of this year, by the end of 2023, all 6,000 or 8,000 regulations that had been adopted by the UK because of the European Union because of the European Union, embraced by the UK as part of the deal with the European Union, all of those would be eliminated. And the UK would draw up its own regulations, which would be supposedly a lot leaner and a lot more effective and a lot more efficient and a lot more poor business, let's say, than the European Union ones. Last week, the UK government said that it was changing its mind. They would not do away with all 6,000, 4,000 or however many regulations they were because it was too difficult, it was too hard. They were afraid that by eliminating all the regulations so fast, they wouldn't make mistakes and bad stuff would happen and business wouldn't be ready. And yeah, bad stuff would happen, right? Because, why? Because they were getting rid of the regulations too fast. So instead, they've decided to get rid of 600 specific laws that will be revoked. Now, 600 is better than nothing, but it's not as good as 4,000. I for one have no problem in thrusting the government into a position where, oh my God, all these regulations have disappeared, what are we going to do now? Business can cope quite well, amazingly well actually, even when they were in a position where suddenly the regulations have disappeared and they don't know what to do. So I wouldn't worry about business in that context. So anyway, the UK is moving a little bit in that direction, but nowhere near as much as it could. I'll still take the 600. One of the real aims of some of this is to put it this way. One of the things the EU is clearly signaling through its regulatory regimes is a disinterest in innovation, technology and progress. So it is basically adopting the precautionary principle where you can't operate anything new unless you can guarantee 100% that it doesn't increase risk. That's the precautionary principle. The EU is finding big tech. The EU basically is discouraging innovation. The UK wants to take a different stance. It wants to encourage it. It wants to support it. It wants to embrace innovation and embrace tech. It still wants to break up big tech and I think it was the UK regulatory agency that prevented Microsoft from buying that gaming company in the name of protecting competition. Just absurd and ridiculous. They're now like eight, ten different regulatory agencies that can put a kibash on a mojo. People accuse us of having a free market, right? And all these problems caused by a free market. What free market are we talking about? The free market where regulators can tell me whether I can mojo or not mojo with another company? God. Anyway, the UK does have a path here to become an innovative innovation center of Europe and basically separate itself from the European Union by having laws and regulations in place and tax code in place that does not discourage innovation, start-ups, technology, business. UK has always had pretty good policies with regard to biotech and if you remember Dolly the sheep that was cloned. They did a lot of kind of cutting edge biotech stuff. Hopefully they can get back to that once now that they've left the European Union and not under the boot of European Union regulations. So there really is an opportunity for the UK to separate itself and to become a real beacon. But it's going to have to move pretty quickly and it's going to have to do things that are pretty dramatic and significant particularly on the regulatory front. And I just wonder if this government and the next government which is likely to be a Labour government have what it takes to achieve that, have what it takes to be successful with that. Thank you very much.