 So now this next session is a perfect follow-up for this webinar that we've just seen, and it will give us an insight of some of NIMO's current partner projects, projects that have been successfully funded in their application. You've heard a bit about MOI already, and then we've added another partner project of NIMO, which is Indiechis, measuring the impact of digital culture and Horizon 2020 funded project. Having said this, I don't want to miss mentioning that NIMO has various other great partner projects, among them the B-Museum project, which essentially provides capacity building for museum professionals in Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, and a new project charter that will create a blueprint for the European heritage sector skills strategy and the professional development. I will now leave the floor to Sara DiGiorgio, who works at ICO, the General Institute for the Union Catalog of the Italian Libraries. She leads this Horizon 2020 funded project Indiechis that focuses on understanding the social and economic impact of digitalization. Sara, please let us know where Indiechis stands at the moment, what you're up to in the coming months and for most of all how people and NIMO members can get involved. Sara. Thank you. Oh, thank you very much. I try to share my screen. Just a few moments. Here it is. Okay, so thank you very much Julia. Thank you. Thank you for being here and what I want to say is that ICCU has also a very long history in European project since 2004 we have been working in, yes, in a European project and it's really a great experience for me and knowing people and reaching our professional work in a very incredible way. So Indiechis, as Julia said, stands for measuring the impact of digital culture, and it is a project founded by Horizon 2020 program in response to the call about digitization digital single market and European culture new challenges for creativity, intellectual property rights and copyrights. Indiechis brings together a consortium coordinated by ICCU that is a central institute that coordinate the Italian library of the Italian Ministry of Culture, and in our consortium participating 14 organization from eight different European countries. The consortium is very rich because it's made up by networks of cultural heritage institutions like NIMO and Europe and the Michelin Association, and then, because it's a research project internationally research group in the domains of economics such as the Fondazione Buruno-Kessler and in IPO and digital humanities like the University of Levin, and then also are joining the consortium representative from the culture and creative industries like Capitalitech that is a French company specialized in business model development and NGOs with the social innovators platform developers like Platonic and finally also an Austrian company specialized in web intelligence media analytics named WebLizer. So, the goal of Indiechis is to empower publicity maker and decision maker in the cultural heritage sector to fully understand the social and economic impact of digitization in their sector, and to address the needs for innovative reuse of cultural assets. So, we have started with these questions. What is the social and economic impact of digitization in cultural and creative sectors, and then how digitization affects our use of cultural heritage assets. To answer this question, Indiechis is developing a solid framework to assess and measure the impact of cultural heritage. We are conducting a comparative analysis of the effects of digitization and IPR regulation, and we will provide guidelines on how cultural institutions can implement and measure the readiness to digital single market. Overcoming IPR issues and supporting openness in order to stimulate digital culture content reuse with operative solution and business model to solve other needs. So, we are setting up an open observatory that include a participatory space to facilitate the community engagement and in the observatory and a visual analytics dashboard to visualize data and trends and a self assessment tool to test the realness of cultural heritage institutions to face the digital single market and the digital transformation are included. Then, we think about impact, and then we usually focus on what to measure and how and why to measure these impact. And so to understand the effects of the digital revolution on modes of culture and creative production, and on their economic impact, a specific framework has been developed by Professor Pierluigi Sacco, the scientific coordinator of Indiechis project. This framework distinguished between three regimes of cultural production. The first stage that is named culture dot one zero applied to known, presently market oriented sectors such as visual art, performing arts, museums and heritage. Then the creative industry that is known as culture to the zero applied to industrialized form of cultural and creative production, based on the distinction between producer and audiences. Finally, open communities of practice that is known as culture three dot zero, where the distinction between producers and users becomes blurred to an increasing extent. Now we are focusing on culture three dot zero regime, gathering data data from social media channels to analyze to what extent people on a specific platform are producing and sharing a certain type of content and how much the production is increased during the COVID-19 outbreak. Here you can see the own page of the user indices open observatory and a landing page for the assembly participatory space, where participants throughout the sequence of activities are unable to define and make a decision on a specific topic. The first process of the indices platform was the co-creation process to initiate activities that had to be graded online due to the pandemic. So the COVID-19 pandemic has demanded the remote work and platonic who developed the platform, but together with all the indices partner, I've taken this as an opportunity to speed up some developments and deployments. So the participatory platform will be soon open to a wider participation of cultural institutions policymaker funding agency researchers and practitioner work networks to conduct co-creation activities and to strengthen capacity building and then to experience the value of opening day knowledge through how joining participatory process. Here you can see the visual analytics dashboard integrated in the open observatory to explore the content archive, tracking recent trends and comparing different data sets. It will be possible with this tool to measure the social impact of the outbreak in the cultural sector, having statistics about the initiatives that museums and institutions are launching online, such as exhibition or digital tours providing the public with safe and convenient online services. So, I would like really to invite all of you museums and experts that are working in museums and also other cultural institutions to collaborate with us. So get involved and participate in our activities by answering these three online survey, they are open until the end of the year. The first is about the intellectual property right challenges in the cultural heritage sector. Or whether IPRs contribute to generating further revenues. And the other tool is about collecting use cases of reuse of digital cultural heritage in products and services to evaluate the value change generated by informal initiatives communities and sector. We are organizing also two workshops. The first will be on March, and we'll explore the relationship between researchers and cultural heritage sector. So, stay tuned and if you want to be updated on our activities please join our mailing list and go to the website or in our Facebook and Twitter channel to learn about the project. Thank you. Thank you, Sarah. Very much for your very short presentation. You're very good and short presentation and short is also our time. This is why I'm just want to ask you one question. How do you think members or everybody who's actually listening now can get involved in the project. You have mentioned the service. You have mentioned the workshops. Are the workshops open to everybody who wants to participate? Absolutely, yes, they are open to everybody and it's also a good opportunity to know how it works our participatory space and to get involved and to get in touch with also all the stakeholders, all the partners that are working in this. But then I would like to invite museums who have intensive activities in such a channel during this pandemic period to get in touch with me directly because we could investigate and analyze their statistics and the results for our research. Participate in the survey, come to the workshop and write me personally to get involved with this very innovative and promising project. Thank you. Super. Thank you very much, Sarah. And again also from our side we are partners and we have decided to become partners because we really believe that if we want to start a digital transformation for the large sector of museums and we need data and this is the data that we should come up with. So I'm coming now very quickly to Pirjo, who's already been on the stage. And we have already heard a bit about the Moi project but this time we want to hear a bit more about how the project works, not so much the application process. So, Pirjo, the floor is yours. Thank you, Julia. And let's go to the presentation. I promised you how much time do you give me. Let's do it. I would like to end the session at one. So we have 10 minutes. Very good. And if something remains unclear, there's at the end of the presentation there are links to further information so I'll try to be very brief, and you can get more information from that slide, which will be distributed to all participants. And I think many of you already participated in the previous session. If not, this is our Moi Museums of Impact project in a nutshell. So this is our technical details. We are a Creative Europe funded project that will last until November 2022. We work with 11 partners from eight different countries which you see mapped out there. Museums, museum advisors, ministries, networks, development agencies, and just to specify Nemo's role in this, Nemo is a very important network of museums and multiplier network for us. And one of the very big benefits of working with Nemo is of course, for example, being able to reach out to a large number of museums and museum organization across Europe. So these kinds of benefits, a lot of the partners bring different benefits to the consortium, but this is a specific benefit for this consortium that we get by working with Nemo. And what we aim to do is to create a European Museum self-evaluation framework, a development framework through which a museum can assess its activities, evaluate what it's doing and think whether the solutions and decisions it's taking are helping it towards impact in that sense that it wants to do. There was a question earlier about connection to, for example, measuring impact, but a simple question is that this project is not about measuring impact. It's about creating impact through your activities and the framework will help you formulate, reformulate, or at least evaluate your activities in a museum in order to achieve impact in society. And in practice, how the framework works is that there are evaluation areas in this draft, there are six of them, different areas within museum activities through which you will go with a series of evaluation questions. For example, how well do you know your audiences? Have you selected specific target audiences? Have you developed specific activities, or are your resources directed towards creating impact? Or are the competencies in your museums aligned with the impact or do you want to achieve these kinds of questions? It's a bit theoretical at the moment, but we are slowly going towards developing a real practical development evaluation framework. And that will probably help you understand much better what this is about. But a developmental framework, an evaluation framework that helps you increase your impact in society is what we are aiming for. And just a reminder what we are talking about when we are talking about impact is the change you want to make or to be in the society. And the whole principle of developmental evaluation in museums and using a framework starts from the fact that all museum organizations need to define the change that they want to achieve in society first, and then follow up a thorough look at their activities, keeping this definition in mind. Some key questions that can be asked in this connection is that for whom and with whom are the services planned or implemented in order to achieve the intended impact? How are the resources put into active use to produce the intended impact? Or has the museum's range of services been created on the basis of conscious choices to achieve the intended impact? These kinds of evaluation questions are included in the framework. This will bring, we hope, a lot of benefits for museums also in terms of advocacy and presenting our value in society. And we can only develop this framework with the full cooperation and involvement of the museum field itself. And how can you be as a museum involved in the development of the framework? In addition, of course, that we have a variable partnership of partners which also includes museums. First of all, the work program includes a number of open stakeholder forums and we've just had our first stakeholder forum in Germany, theoretically speaking, because it was an online event, but meant for the German museum landscape. And there will be further stakeholder forums. The next one will take place in Italy or will be directed towards the Italian museum landscape. And these will be used to formulate the model together with the museum sector and its stakeholders. And we invite everybody to join these stakeholder forums. We will also be piloting the draft framework next summer and autumn in museums across Europe, mainly in the partner countries, but possibly elsewhere also. And this will be done based on an application process that the project will announce later. We don't have the possibility to do the pilot in a huge number of museums, but there will be possibilities to join this. And included in the project, there's also, towards the end of the project, there's also mobility scheme connected to developmental evaluation in museums and using the framework through which a number of museum professionals have the possibility to join and to increase their competence in developmental evaluation or using the framework. You see the faces, the next faces happening at the bottom of the slide, but what we at the end hope that this will be a tool that will help to think about the museums impact in society and also to increase it. It's not about quality in museum processes. It's not about measuring the impact, but this model or framework can support and add to such evaluations. It will be modular and it will be freely accessible to anybody. And our initial plan is that this access will be happening in the future through the NEMON network and we have also planned a number of support materials, hopefully also even support actions to help you implement this model in your museum if you wish to do so. So we are only just starting, but we hope to be able to provide more concrete results in a near future. And if you want to know more about the project, you're free to, you're welcome to contact us, email, Facebook and web pages of the MOI project are available. And that's it. Thank you very much, Pierre-Jo. Thank you for your presentation. I would like to ask you one question and that is actually one that comes from the Stakeholder Forum, which we as you went mentioning had with some most of German museums. I felt that there was a bit of a hesitation towards an evaluation framework. Can you tell us what you think is the biggest hesitation from those museums towards a framework? Is it a challenge to feel evaluated or assessed or is it the general anxiety with something new coming up? Well, of course, it can be a great number of things and we've already identified challenges that come from working on a European level on something that we should need to agree with in museum activities across Europe. So, but I think many people have been faced with evaluations that are top down evaluations come from outside and possibly are connected to funding, for example. And you should be very much aware that this is not that kind of an evaluation. It's a self evaluation model that's meant for the museum organization as a tool of development. So I've been starting to think that we might not even call it an evaluation model. We might call it rather a development framework. Just in order to avoid confusing this with, for example, measuring something or assessing your performance because this is not about assessing your performance. And of course, the other thing is that this asks openness and democracy from the institutions. It's asking them to make a joint assessment with possibly all the staff included about how we are performing. What's our goal in the society and how can we choose the best ways of working towards this goal? And perhaps this is not an easy process in all the museum landscape and not all the organizations. And this just has to be recognized in developing the model. Yeah. Thank you, Peter. I think when you were showing one slide in the in the webinar before, which said, it's not easy, but it's absolutely worth it. And I think this is what we need to keep in mind when it comes to European cooperation and adapting something new. I also heard a very nice comment from Dragana, I think, who was saying, I started working with colleagues and I came out working with friends. So I think this is also something with which we can end. Thank you very much both to Sarah, both to Pirio for this session. I'm sorry that it was very short. We couldn't go into a long question and answers. But as you are saying, you're open to any kind of questions from from the audience. I all have provided us with. And you can also get in touch via Nemo with each of the individual projects. So thank you very much. Before I end this session, I would like to invite all the anymore. No, first of all, I would like to invite all of you to help us improve our digital first digital annual conference, which means that I would like to invite you to fill out this evaluation survey it just helps us to understand what we did well and what could be done better for the next time, hopefully in person by the way. Thank you everybody for this great conference for days with a very small team and again a lot of things to this team here at Nemo they did the incredible really. We meet again for only the Nemo members at 2pm CET for our Nemo annual general meeting first ever digital annual general meeting so this is going to be a new experience for all of us. If you haven't registered as a member but you would like to participate, please write a message to office at Nemo.org. And for those who can get enough of us, you're invited to join us at 8pm CET for a pub quiz and networking roulette. And again, if you haven't registered for this one and you would like to join, it's going to be fun, I promise. Please find the link to the meeting also in the chat. And with this, I say, thank you to everybody who has been with us for the four days, three days, two days or just today, it was a great experience for us. I'm very happy that this was over and over a European cooperation that we did digitally but I think it went very well. So I hope to see you next year in person. Goodbye.