 Nobody gets disenfranchised. We can make this happen. We can make this happen. You know, make America reasonable again? I don't know. Efficient again? Non-third world banana republic again? That would be nice. So yeah, I mean this voting stuff is insane. It is complicated because of federalism. Every state has its own laws. Every state has its own regulations. Do you know why Florida got all the votes done within hours and Pennsylvania hasn't? Well, basically two different, you know, state laws. And it's interesting because everybody is yelling for it. I think the president is on right now live at a press conference, you know, yelling, massive fraud, they're stealing an election from him and so on. But why are the votes that are in Philadelphia or Pennsylvania right now coming in as Biden votes? Because we knew from the beginning that, and everybody was reporting on this, everybody reported on this, including the Republican Party, including Donald Trump, that the mail-in votes were going to be Democratic. The Democrats were using mail-in votes and Republicans were going to show up at the polls. Well, in Florida, what they do is they start counting the mail-in votes a couple of weeks before the election day. So as they come in, they're counting them. So when they're starting to report results, like Wednesday night, whenever that was, no, it was Tuesday night, seems like ages ago, Tuesday night, they had all the mail-in-vote results ready. And this is why Biden, at the beginning of the night, had a huge lead in Florida and the Democrats were celebrating. It was like, yeah, we've won this, man, we're taking Florida. And then every 30 minutes, every hour, Trump votes came in, more came in. Why? Because those are the votes that are actually being cast during the day. And by huge leaps and bounds, suddenly Florida turned from blue to red. And the red got darker in a sense that his margins grew. So in Florida, you got the mail-in votes counted first, then the day of the voting. Now in Pennsylvania, they're not allowed to start counting the mail-in votes until the election is over, until the in-person voting is over. So in Pennsylvania, when they started reporting the votes, they were reporting all the day-of votes, which were dominantly Republican, which were dominantly for Trump. So the state was overwhelmingly red. And since then, they've slowly been recording and counting the mail-in votes. And it takes time because we have what do you call it, antiquated system. So it just takes time. So they're slowly counting. And yes, most of these votes, and given the counties from which they're coming in, an overwhelming majority of these votes are Democratic or for Biden. So slowly, Pennsylvania is becoming a little less red and tilting. So we're now, I think, what's the gap right now? I mean, it went for like half a million, and now it's, oops, wrong view. Wait a minute. All right, I'll get you the gap in Pennsylvania's quick math. Basically, 75,000, let's say, 75,000 votes. Can Biden make that up? Yeah, probably. Maybe. It's hard to tell. No, it's actually, it's less than 80. If you look at it right now, I'm looking at the tallies, 3188 to 3262. So it's just a quirk of the way the states were on the election. How do we know? There was a massive fraud in Florida that led to the massive run up in Trump votes after the fact or fraud before in the main lane votes or whatever. Bashingen says, he says, paper voting leaves paper trail, e-voting could be hacked. Yeah, but that's why I'm saying blockchain. My understanding is you could create a secure network. I mean, isn't that what crypto is? I mean, isn't the whole idea of Bitcoin that you can move money around and it's completely secure and it can't be hacked? You know, I don't know. This is beyond my pay grade. But don't you think that we could build a system if we left it to our best entrepreneurs? Ian says, not with blockchain. Fine, I don't care. But just fix this disaster. It should be easy to vote. Stefan asks, any chance there was been tampering with elections? Of course. There's always tampering with elections. And again, I'm ascending when it comes to government and elections and political parties. I mean, everything from my understanding is that the reason JFK won is because the dailies, the daily family delivered votes of dead people in Illinois that tipped the balance in 1960 against Richard Nixon and for JFK. So are there, is there fodder? Yes. Is it only Democrats? No. Why would you think that? What is in the world to suggest that only Democrats would do this? I mean, I'm talking about local operatives. I'm not talking about grand scheme. Is there a grand scheme? No. Couldn't get away with it. But no. You know, the Trump administration is suing. We have a rule of law in this country. We have courts. We have judges. Judges, many of which were appointed by Trump. Even Fox News. Fox and Friends, like the chewing society for what do you call it? For Trump thinks this is nonsense. I mean, really, there is fodder. It's likely to be small scale. It's likely to be here and there. It's likely to affect both political parties. Is there fodder to scale that would win this particular presidential election when lawyers are everywhere? Lawyers are being deployed to the precinct from before the election. Everybody knew this was going to get to litigation. There were lawyers everywhere. Where would there be fraud if the lawyers are looking over everybody's shoulder? And the lawsuits are coming. And the lawsuits, some of the lawsuits have already been thrown out. Some of the lawsuits are still coming. I just read that the Trump administration is suing Nevada for fraud. All right. Let's see. My guess is educated guess. There's going to be none of it. None of it is going to be provable. There are lots of graphs online. There are lots of images online. There are lots of numbers being reported online. Before you believe any of them, verify them. Check their source. I mean, I've told you this for years now. I don't use quotes unless I go and watch the video and figure out if the quote is real. If somebody is reporting some factual thing, I double check it. You can't trust anybody, certainly not on Twitter, on Facebook. Most lawyers are Democrats. So there are no Republican lawyers? I mean, the Republican Party didn't send lawyers to all the polling places? Really? I mean, are they that incompetent? Weren't they talking about two weeks, three weeks, two months ago that the Republican Party was going to send lawyers to all these polling places? Of course they sent lawyers. Republican lawyers. I mean, the Republican Party is not going to hire Democratic lawyers. Really? People, slow down. Think it through. Check your sources. Verify the evidence. I've seen these screenshots that more people voted, I think, in Wisconsin than actually registered to vote for Wisconsin. Is that true? No, you do a little search on the web and you'll find that that is just untrue. And if you're not sure about something, you know, search for an explanation. The problem is that people just are unbelievably, unthinkingly gullible and buy into any story, particularly if it reinforces their prior beliefs, particularly if it reinforces their prior emotions, their prior, ah, star jet voted for me. Cool. Cool. Just, I mean, the reason I have been so anti-Trump all these years is because exactly what's going on tonight. He is a president who, before he ran for president, was a conspiracy theorist. Remember the birth of conspiracy? He was a president who is now using conspiracy theories to try to hold on to power when it looks like, we don't have final numbers, but it looks like the democratic process, the process of voting, has voted him out. And by the way, it's not a democratic process. It's a Republican constitutional process because we don't have straight democracy. If we did, he'd be clearly out because he clearly lost the popular vote. Now, he claims that he won the popular vote in 2016 and that that was fraud even back then. Well, if he believed that, then why didn't he send more lawyers? Why wasn't he even better prepared? I mean, don't buy this nonsense. Don't buy it. What we need today, what I call the new intellectual, would be any man or woman who is willing to think, meaning any man or woman who knows that man's life must be guided by reason, by the intellect, not by feelings, wishes, wins, or mystic revelations. Any man or woman who values his life and who does not want to give in to today's cult of despair, cynicism, and impotence, and does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist brought. All right, before we go on, reminder, please like the show. We've got 163 live listeners right now, 30 likes. That should be at least 100. I figure at least 100 of you actually like the show. Maybe they're like 60 of the Matthews out there who hate it. But at least the people who are liking it, I want to see a thumbs up. There you go. Start liking it. I want to see that go to 100. All it takes is a click of a thing, whether you're looking at this. And you know the likes matter. It's not an issue of my ego. It's an issue of the algorithm. The more you like something, the more the algorithm likes it. So if you don't like the show, give it a thumbs down. Let's see your actual views being reflected in the likes. But if you like it, don't just sit there. Help get the show promoted. Of course, you should also share. And you can support the show at your own bookshow.com slash support on Patreon or subscribe star or locals and show you support for all for the work, for the value. Hopefully you're receiving from this. And of course, don't forget, if you're not a subscriber, even if you, even if you just come here to troll, or even if you're here like Matthew to defend Marx, then you should subscribe because that way you'll know when to show up. You'll know what shows are on, when they're on. You'll get notified, right? So yes, like, share, subscribe, support. Like, share, subscribe, support. There you go. Easy. Do one, all of those, please.