 Two things to surprise, thank you very very good round of opinions here. I thought it and I would speak rather more about the Abraham Accords so I'm going to ask him a little bit about that. And also the country that no one has really referred to except me in passing is Saudi Arabia, which Egypt is the most populous Arab country but one could argue that in some ways Saudi Arabia is now the most activist I suppose there's a good way of putting it under Mohammed bin Salman. So I just wonder, I mean if for example Saudi Arabia were to sign to join up to the Abraham Accords that would be a huge game changer. Is that possible in the next before 2030 Itamar? Before I respond I'd like to make a brief comment on what Volker has just mentioned about connectivity or efforts to change the traditional geography of the region. Two of these aspiring regional powers Iran and Turkey have been doing that. Iran is seeking a land bridge from the eastern periphery of the region to the Mediterranean. This is a driving element of its policy. Iraq, Syria directly or Syria Lebanon and Turkey a game they played in Libya, the efforts to define economic zones in the Mediterranean so to block the laying of a pipeline for guys that Mona has spoken from Egypt or Israel to Europe. Interesting manifestation of this issue. Now to the Abraham Accords. First of all interestingly it's the only foreign policy success for the Trump administration. I mean I'm a huge critic of the Trump administration domestic and foreign policy but this is something that they accomplished and for this they deserve credit. Second from let's say Israel's point of view it's very important. I've been pleased during these three days to hear how proud UAE officials and spokespersons are of these accords as an achievement of their diplomacy and it's a very pleasant surprise for Israelis because our experience with Egypt and Jordan, the countries that had made peace with Israel before were always trying to conceal it or to lower the profile and here is a country very proud of normalizing relations with Israel. I think that ultimately it will prove to be to have a very important healing effect on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict because of the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians or the larger Arab-Israeli conflict created somewhat of an anti-Arab feeling in Israel that is an element in fomenting right-wing politics in the country. The open warm peace with the Emirates, with Bahrain and with Morocco now will open up friendly environments to Israelis. There'll be COVID is now standing in the middle of that but I think we'll begin to see a much larger movement of people to and from. There are three airlines flying between the Emirates and Israel now. Several flights every day, direct flights and to Morocco and Israeli society I think will be changed, transformed by this contact with Arabs who are friendly and who just want to have a normal relationship. Ultimately it's going to affect Israeli outlook on the Palestinians so while the Palestinians were initially angry with their cause they calmed down and I think they will realize ultimately that it's going actually to... But on the Saudi question, which you are neatly skirting around. The Saudis have been very helpful in all of these. Bahrain would not have moved without a note from the Saudis and the Saudis opened the airspace to these flights between the Emirates and Israel make it much. And there was a Saudi plan back in 2000 which I can't remember due to recognition. Saudi, that original Saudi plan I think has been outdated by events and Saudi diplomacy has since moved but it's up to the Saudis. I think that domestically they feel that they are still not ready for that. Will they in the next nine years and what will Saudi politics look like? How many more princes will end up in hotel prisons or prison hotels? We don't know. So it's a domestic Saudi question, it's not a larger issue. Ipchisam, and also with the Saudi question Saudi Arabia recently said that foreign companies setting up in the Gulf region could have their regional headquarters in Saudi Arabia rather than as has been custom in Dubai for example. That struck me as being a slightly unfriendly act but they are your neighbours and friends so what is happening, what is going to happen? First I will comment on the Abraham Accord. For sure it was a game changer in the region and UAE was bold when it took that step now. But UAE is small country and slim. Saudi has many constraints. They are the casted Yen of the Holy Shrine and they have a huge population and conservative and some of them also more fanatic Islamist. It is not an easy step plus they have that King Abdullah initiative. The two state solution and each of those signatures has been awarded with something. Now the Saudi if they are looking for what to be awarded that to implement the King Abdullah initiative. We know that and we heard that Netanyahu was there and met with Prince Mohammed bin Salman. He was about to join but what I said the constraints inside that which is still preventing but I believe also if Trump was still there they will be going on that road because that one of the Trump what he considered a historic deal he did. Well he still thinks you may get the Nobel Prize. We'll see if they will consider that he deserved that. Now coming back to the other question. We are alliance that's right but the answers are not identical. This is no more in the international relations between between the states now. Competition is open like Sheikh Mohammed Marashid he said. It's there who want to compete but at least those whom they will choose. Still there are those major companies they did not close their offices in Dubai. The facilities Dubai is giving is being giving before is tremendous and huge. Saudi still and I believe still it's needs a culture as well. So they will but not now. I think they need but part also of a new project this is when it has been done including Israeli. I don't think it can be without them. Thank you I'm going to come back to you all later.