 As other countries consider developing their own domestic shale resources, what are some of the key lessons they could learn from the U.S. experience? So one of the important things to understand in comparing the U.S. experience to what might occur in other countries is the ownership of the subsurface rights. The U.S. context, private ownership sets up the opportunity for individual landowners to benefit financially from the development and have some control over the way that development occurs on their property. In other countries, generally speaking, subsurface rights are owned by the state in some manner. So that sets up very different ways of potential benefit flows to community members and their ability to influence or control how that development occurs, how fast the regulations that are in place, and so on. So I think the first lesson is to really think through what are the ways that residents who live near the development could benefit and what ways can they have some say and some control over that development, whether that's legal processes, whether that's regulatory systems. I mean, we've seen in Australia the Lock the Gate movement is largely because they have no say in that process. So it's really critical to think about those two pieces. How do people benefit? How can the benefits be transferred to people through legal and regulatory mechanisms? I think that's sort of the first cut. The second cut is to really think about what regulations are in place. I think one of the lessons we learned here in Pennsylvania is that the existing oil and gas regulations were built for a different industry. And it took a couple years for our state system to really respond and create regulations that would be protective of the environment and the communities. So really think through those regulations up front and try to have them in place as development begins. And I think the other main lesson is to think about a way to monitor development. So a social impact assessment in the beginning, South Africa had an excellent, very comprehensive social impact assessment process that could be a lesson for other places. And to really then put in place mechanisms for monitoring what happens over time. That's one of the things we don't have here, at least in the Marcellus, is a consistent way to measure how people are perceiving development, what kinds of benefits and risks are occurring over time as industry changes and matures in place. The other main content area I would focus on is health impacts. It's something that we don't have a great handle on here in the Marcellus or in the U.S. generally. So developing systems for tracking epidemiologically what happens over the course of the development. Those would be the prime areas I would recommend that they think about.