 Nobody was quite as good as Milton Friedman in taking economic concepts and making him digestible to the common person. So that's stylistically mainly because there was nothing content wrong. I'd say the content points, weak on the morality, just didn't get it, didn't get there. And it felt like he was rushing it. Again, I think there's an inherent discomfort with the moral point. I think he attributes rights to God. It's a quick point. He implicitly, it doesn't make a big deal out of this, but he implicitly suggests abortion is evil.