 Soy bad for the environment? Produced in a colossal international scale, soy has a huge environmental impact, but probably not for the reasons you think. Listen on to discover the hidden driving force behind soy related to forestation and why eating plant-based alternatives like soy is still better for the planet. The origins of soybeans. The soybean, a species of legume originally native to East Asia, has for millennia held an important place in Asian cooking and culture. Only in the last hundred years has the soybean entered Western diets, and since then the crop has grown to become one of the world's most essential and profitable agricultural commodities. In just 50 years, soybean production has increased 15 times over experiencing one of the greatest expansions of any global crop. Today, soy is cultivated on an immense global scale with the U.S. and South America dominating production. The latter produced nearly 50% of the world's share. Unfortunately, this expansion has come at a cost. As demand soars, huge areas of natural land are converted into soy plantations, causing wide-scale deforestation and other devastating knock-on effects. From biodiversity loss and rising carbon emissions to soil erosion and water contamination. But the damaging rate and scale that soy is produced in today isn't because we're suddenly eating more soy foods. The real reason is far more surprising. So what's really driving soy demand? For years, we've seen the perpetuation of a largely false stereotype that increased soy production reflects growth and popularity for vegan and vegetarian types. This erroneous myth has helped spur the widespread belief that soy-based foods and the vegans and vegetarians who eat them are as much responsible for environmental destruction as animal-based products, like meat and dairy. And although soy production does come with environmental costs, most of it is not grown for the reasons we think. The real driver behind excessive soybean cultivation is not ardent vegans and vegetarians, but counter-intuitively, the meat, dairy and egg industries. This is because the vast majority of the world's soybeans, between 80 and 90%, is fed to farmed animals. Of the soy remaining, just 6% is turned into soy products for human consumption. Soy, the ghost ingredient on our plates. Most livestock, from pigs to cows, poultry to farmed fish, are fed soy. Why? Because it's cheap and effective. In fact, high-protein soy has become such a popular feed crop that each year, the average European consumes 61 kg of soy indirectly through the animal products they eat. The ironic reality is, soybeans are more likely to appear on our plates as ghost ingredients in steak dinners and milkshakes than as tofu. With this in mind, it's time to set the record straight. The environmental footprint of soy grown for animal feed far surpasses that of soy grown for human consumption. So, let's take a look at some of the biggest environmental impacts posed by industrial soy production and why soy is still an eco-friendly alternative when consumed in the right form. 1. Deforestation As an annual crop, soy plants only produce one yield in each life cycle and are virtually unresponsive to fertilizers. What this means is simple. To increase yield and meat demand, more soy has to be planted, which requires more land. Unfortunately, in the tropical countries where soy is largely produced, this results in vast areas of virgin land being cleared to grow soy beans. Worldwide, soy cultivation takes up an area the size of France, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands combined, making it the second largest agricultural driver of deforestation, following beef. But it is in South America in particular where most soy related to deforestation has been concentrated, primarily Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia and Paraguay. In 2018, the total area of land in South America dedicated to soy stood at over 57 million hectares, an area larger than France. And with production soaring, deforestation in these regions is likely to continue, with bleak implications for the plants and animals that inhabit these spaces. 2. Threatened Biodiversity As huge swaths of land are converted, habitats are lost and vital ecosystems destroyed, triggering wide-scale biodiversity loss. The Cerrado Basin, Brazil's tropical savanna region, is a prime example of this. As the world's most biodiverse savanna, the Cerrado is home to a menagerie of wildlife, sheltering some 5% of Earth's living species. Sadly, with the climate and land favorable for farming, limited conservation protection, as well as negligible penalties for clearing forest land, recent decades have seen nearly half of the Cerrado's native vegetation lost to intensive agribusiness, of which soy forms a central portion. Satellite imagery taken between 2006 and 2017, revealed 170,000 hectares of Cerrado forest was cleared to grow soybeans. And, in large part, this is legal. In fact, under Brazil's forest code, only 20% of privately-owned Cerrado land, compared to 80% in Amazon rainforests, needs to be set aside for conservation, which means the remaining 80% can be legally deforested for soy farming. Recent research projected that if agribusiness were to continue in the Cerrado at its current pace by 2050, this extraordinary landscape and the species within it would have largely disappeared. 3. Carbon emissions The global trade and production of soy doesn't just impact biodiversity. It also affects Earth's climate, generating significant amounts of greenhouse gases. And the conversion of native land into agricultural land, like we've seen in the Cerrado and elsewhere, appears to be the leading contributor to emissions. Since forests absorb and store mammoth quantities of carbon dioxide, the Amazon rainforest alone holds some 76 billion tons of CO2, or equivalent to 21 years of Europe's current annual carbon emissions, when forests are cleared to grow crops like soy, detrimental amounts of CO2 are released into our atmosphere. Furthermore, mechanized harvesting and processing of soy, coupled with export-related food miles, present another emissions burden. 4. Soil erosion Agriculture is the leading cause of soil erosion worldwide, and soy production is no exception. Over time, practices such as plowing and intensive irrigation, coupled with a lack of wind cover from trees, disturb and deplete nutrient-rich topsoil. Each year, Brazil loses an estimated 55 million tons of topsoil to soy cultivation. The effects of this loss are sobering. As more fertile soil is lost, agricultural land decreases in productivity, threatening crop yields and long-term global food security. 5. Strained water resources Since soy requires a lot of water to grow, requiring nearly 300 liters of water to produce 1 liter of soy milk, unsustainable water use exhausts natural underground water source, on top of which, farming vehicles like tractors compact the earth over time, preventing water from being reabsorbed back into these stores. The result? Rapidly declining water availability for local communities, flora and fauna. Unfortunately, industrial soil cultivation degrades water quality as well. Relying on agrochemicals such as pesticides and fertilizers, soy farming contaminates surrounding water sources like rivers and estuaries, harming wildlife and posing health problems to rural communities. 6. Feeding the earth's growing population As populations increase and the global middle class expands, animal-based foods are on the rise. By 2025, global production of beef and pork is expected to increase by 22% compared with a decade ago. Poultry by 26%, dairy by 18%, and eggs by as much as 27% by 2030. As this demand climbs, more land will need to be cleared to grow soy-based animal feed. But animal agriculture and associated soy cultivation already use a disproportionate amount of land and resources. According to the FAO, grazing land and cropland designated to animal feed comprises almost 80% of all agricultural land. To prevent further environmental damage and feed the world's growing population sustainably, we need to use arable land more efficiently. Could soy be a solution? Ironically, embracing soy as a protein substitute could be key to the solution. Soy, when consumed directly by people, rather than filtered through livestock food chains, is incredibly land efficient. To paint a picture, producing the same amount of protein from chicken as soy requires three times the area of land, pork nine times and beef 32 times. In fact, in regards to protein intake, if the world were to swap meat protein for soy protein, agricultural defrostation would decline by as much as 94%. In other words, reducing our dependence on animal products by increasing our consumption of soy-based alternatives would help us feed more people while using dramatically less land and protect the planet in the process. But harnessing the innate sustainability of soy hinges on one crucial condition, that it is eaten by people, not livestock. What can we do as consumers? As we've seen, each time we eat animal products, we become accountable for environmental damage two-fold, both directly from the negative impacts associated with animal agriculture and indirectly, through driving demand for soy as a feed crop. With this in mind, choosing plant-based alternatives like soy will almost always be more sustainable than eating the equivalent in animal products, so don't go denouncing soy products altogether. However, eating soy products can be even more environmentally friendly when done alongside the following. Reducing animal product consumption. The most direct way to reduce soy-related environmental damage is to reduce our consumption of animal products. For example, a report by the WWF found that if everyone reduced their meat consumption to just the nutritional guidelines, 650 million hectares or 1.5 times the area of the EU would be saved from agricultural production. Buying local. Most of the soy we eat is imported from abroad. Which contributes to carbon emissions. Where possible, try to source soy products from local producers to reduce air miles. However, it's important to be mindful of how your local soy is being grown. In some cases, research has shown that crops grown locally in heated greenhouses with artificial lighting can create more CO2 than crops that are grown outside and transported. Buying organic. When buying local isn't an option, opt for organic produce. Organic produce, under EU standards, avoids chemical fertilizers and pesticides, reducing the amount of environmental damage caused by production. Were you surprised to discover that animal products largely drive extensive soy production? Let us know on our social media. Thank you very much for listening. This article is written by Molly Melvin and read by me, Ines Ortolonso, originally posted on Food Unfolded. Food Unfolded explores the stories behind the food on our plates, reconnecting us to the origins and sustainability of our food. Food Unfolded is co-funded by the EU and powered by EIT Food.