 Consulting firm, private equity firm, called the Inxit Group of Companies, and this is my first time in Salt Lake City. And I'm a bit jealous of the scenery around here. Yeah, I didn't know you all were gonna be on Twitter, so I threw my stuff up there. So, hopefully I've done a good job of condensing about 15,000 words into about 15 minutes. So I'll do my best to kind of run through things. Funny slides. So, in this era, human ambitions will yield inevitable technological ambiguities in the realm of ethics, and even the very classifications that our species has understood itself as being for the past 200,000 years or so. In the present, we will be challenged to become as agile in our ideas on humanity as a multitude of innovators will be inventing the future. I'm sure you all are familiar with these movies. They just briefly peer into kind of what society's fears are of how technology will affect us in the near or far future. All of them suggest technological catastrophes, and they accompany our very poor social interaction as we have it today. So I'm an engineer and an economics nerd to sum it all up and have some degrees in those fields. And my objective is usually to root cause problems and how they exist and try to figure out what incentivizes those problems, whether they're political, economic, socio-cultural, or technological problems. So basically, my greatest fear and the reason that I write right now and publish the book this past July is that in my generation, I was, I'm a millennial, I was born in 1981, at some time during my life, that we have the potential to lose our technological abilities, our technological extensions, as a direct result of our failure to produce some reasonable social interaction. And these slides are, you know, test tube insceptions and, you know, war as we've known it, a war depiction. And basically, over the past 200,000 years or so, spirituality has dominated the human consciousness, including the identity of a wide array of immaterial theologies, ideologies, and mythologies. And human's ability to compensate for the unidentified, well-known, over the millennia have provided some extraordinary philosophical exploration. I'm always, you know, impressed in reading back to see what people were thinking about hundreds and thousands of years ago. But the way I've kind of sum up spirituality is as compensating for our inability to understand how we function in the post-human genome era. Now we're getting a little bit better. So I sum all this up to say that spirituality in its relative state, you know, as some of you may be Mormons and others may be Muslim or Christian, or have their particular spiritual, someone's on Skype, their different spiritual belief systems, they all tend to be relative based on the current economic state. So it all involves, well, it's all due to the relative scarcity, you know, where we live, how we live, and what we have access to. So again, I'm a business guy and value proposition is more of an MBAs term than a philosophical term, or anything have to do with transhumanism. But in looking at spirituality and trying to explore it on my own, as I used to be a participant in the Christian church in the United Church of Christ. And I try to figure out what is the core value proposition of spirituality? And I figure, you know, it's ultimately to make connections between physical beings and kind of compensate for the lack of connections that we can identify by the naked eye. You know, I may be brown, I may all not be brown in this room. And you know, male, female, people have different geographical and other differences that are identified. And you know, so spirituality's core value proposition is to make inner human connections and superhuman connections to some greater being to try and figure out the meaning of life and why we're here and how we can afford to get along better. So, you know, my next question to myself in this exploration was, you know, can the value proposition be achieved? And per the modern understanding of philosophical definitions on spirits and how they exist, spirits are only stakeholders and a singular physical being, even as there are theologies that identify a supreme spirit, the physical beings understanding of its individual spirits interaction with itself is what molds sociopolitical interaction. So again, I'm just addressing the incentives or rather disincentives that we have to interact well. So, there's already a physical being's understanding of its spirit existence incentivizes this individualistic sentiment, which in turn incentivizes all sorts of spin out realities like elitism and protectionism and things of that sort. So, these sentiments as we feel that we are, you know, elites or have created some property or have entitlements to some property or ownership of some property, whether it be intellectual property or land or anything in those circles, we do have incentives to react violently towards each other. And I think it sort of stems from our spiritual understanding of ourselves. This is a really quick incentive model that I put together based on our economic realities and our understanding of our spiritual being. So, the S obviously represents the spirit and a spiritual being or force and the P represents a physical being and up top you have the spiritual and physical being interacting over some scarce resources. And I have desperation over in the left hand corner. Some of the adverse situations that we read about in the news today are all really a result of scarce resources, you know, multiple entities fighting over various scarce resources. So, if you have a consumer in say Dubai buying fruit and they're consuming competitor in Dubai, very similar name, very different place in the northwestern part of Saudi Arabia. Because the people of Dubai can afford to buy their goods at such a high premium, they kind of outcast the consumers in Dubai and create a direct sociocultural rift at which point these spiritual beings, they find all kinds of incentives to validate their, what we're calling terrorism here in the United States today, but to validate their aggression towards this more powerful consumer. And then when you go to the bottom of the slide and consider even a situation where resources are abundant, there is still per spiritual understanding some incentives for the physical beings to interact aggressively, to procure the majority of abundant resources because of their potential sense of entitlement based on their spiritual understandings of themselves. So, I believe that acknowledgement of spirituality and its direct connection to either some divine being or outside force manipulating our ability to perform well amongst each other can create and does create a sense of entitlement, a sense of elitism and ultimately a sense of protectionism which is where you get violent interaction between physical counterparts, human beings. So, it's necessary to understand where these disincentives stem from. I think the last presenter kind of hit on this well. I call it in a new book I'm working on, the known division. So, as we understand ourselves, maybe not necessarily the people in this room, but as the majority of the human population understands themselves, they are distinctly different from everyone else. And you even see it in something as simple as row rage. People get pissed off, excuse my French, and feel entitled to the road as it is, and need you to get out of the way. And so, you see all kinds of aggressive actions that come about. And anyway, because of this known division, we tend to interact without any regard for our human counterparts' ability to exist well. And even our, as science has come about over the millennia, even our understanding of ourselves at the most minute level has been as distinctly different interacting bodies to come together and create this whole. When about 20 years or so ago, as string theory has started to develop, at least from a theoretical and mathematical standpoint, we're starting to see, and maybe sometime in the near future, we'll be able to have an actual experiment that we can witness with our own eyes, that we are potentially, or as I understand it, we are in fact all directly connected with everything in existence, including each other. And it kind of takes away from the ill incentives that we're brought about from our individualistic being previously. So, I'll get on kind of speeding through this pretty fast, and maybe we'll have some time for some questions. So how do we get better from here? I'm not a believer. So I believe that it is necessary to get rid of the, that's a bad line. I think I rewrote that. It's necessary to get rid of the ambiguities that come about through these relative understandings of morality. So depending on who you are and what your economic state is in reference to your competitors, your idea of morality can be totally different. I think the first speaker even referenced that morality had to do with becoming more like God, and that can mean a lot of different things to a lot of different people. So the idea of morality as it stands today is a bit ambiguous because of its relativity. And so I don't think that it's productive for the human species to, excuse me, to progress in this century and beyond regarding the good as a moral good. I think we should specifically be honoring our mortal being and to be more redundant. I think that it's necessary for us to figure out how to protect lives because they are what adds value. Our ability to explore things philosophically, our ability to build things. I think over the past 100, 200 years or so, we've proven that through adequate education that individuals from vastly different backgrounds can come about to produce very significant technological goods. And having said that, here's the definition of the philosophy that my book is titled on integrationism and it is the mortal stance political philosophy, ideology, or social outlook that stresses the worth of the group. Integrationists promote the exercise of the individual's goals and desires, promote incentivizing them to explore well while not acknowledging their group dependence. Integrationists acknowledge an infinite loop of external interference upon one's own interests and uses group designation to incentivize the individual to create value for the group through self-actualization and technological developments of sorts. I just, I really think that this is important because if you go back to any spiritual doctrine or how we understand ourselves as existing via spirituality, we have the potential to shut out some extraordinary technological and philosophical and political and sociocultural thought inside of our, what are we at, 6.8 billion individuals existing currently. With that said, that is my best shot to sum up half of the book project. That's it.