 So my first question is about the relation of your countries with Soviet history and its influence on the national identity of your country today. And this question is not out of this cup because we see that in order to anticipate the war and to understand Russia's intention, it is as important to understand Putin's vision of history as much to count the military equipments. We have two extreme examples today with Russia where many Russians are nostalgic from the Soviet Union and Stalin is the most popular historical figure and on the opposite side Ukraine that started the decommunization, dismantled monuments to Lenin after the Maidan Revolution and commemorates now the memory of Golodomor forces starvation under Stalin. And this genocide was recognized by many countries and Georgia and Moldova too. I'm not sure about Kazakhstan. You will correct me, Mr. Vasilenko, if Kazakhstan recognized it. So my question is, where are your respective countries on the scale between these two extreme visions of Soviet history? How does this past continue to define your identity, your present? And what's the influence of the Soviet period on your national identity today? And 30 years after the fall of the Soviet Union, can we still speak about the post-Soviet space? Is it still united with the only factor that continues to keep this space together? Is the relationship, bilateral relationship with Russia with different kind of pressure on energy, other security and other different matters? So how do you define yourself today, the space and you in this space? I will start with Mr. Vasilenko. Thank you very much. Thank you Tatiana. Yes indeed, 30 years have passed since the end of the Soviet Union and by now more than 50% of Kazakhstan's population is under 30 years of age. So they don't know how it was under the Soviet Union and they basically like the entire country is looking into the future. Going back to history, although it was a complex history of us living under the Soviet Union and true there were positive things but there were also negative things and one only need to mention collectivization which caused the deaths of half of the population in Kazakhstan in the early 30s or the Soviet nuclear weapons testing in eastern part of Kazakhstan etc etc or the location of gulags in Kazakhstan and the exile of dozens of ethnicities to our country. So today we would like to think of this space as you call it as our neighborhood and the neighborhood and the neighbors with whom we need to build relations. Of course mindful of our common history in the past of our common geography today but also mindful of our common future which we need to build together. Thank you very much. Thank you. I think that language defines reality so what we call it to a certain extent would define what it becomes. So when the Soviet Union collapsed the countries, the 15 republics resulting after that were called the newly independent states. Obviously 31 year on we no longer call them newly independent. The commonwealth of independent states is not as relevant or appropriate, right? The post-Soviet or former Soviet Union that's the parts that we Moldova have not chosen and we don't necessarily see that it defines us now so the preference is that we use the present and the future to define ourselves. So I would rather hear instead of post-Soviet Moldova an EU hopeful Moldova or candidate for EU membership Moldova or reform oriented Moldova, western leaning Moldova shall I say freedom loving Moldova. What you prefer. Thank you very much. You mentioned the language. Can you remember just to our audience the percentage, the number of people speaking Russian, speaking people in your respective countries? Well in Kazakhstan it's almost everybody basically and we pursue the tri-lingual policy of everybody needing to speak Kazakh, state language, Russian but also learning English. And for you Olga, for your country? It's a hard question because many people are indeed bilingual. If we were to look at the ethnic minorities and we have Ukrainians, we have Russians, we have Gagaus who are ethnic Turks but are quite Russian speaking so I would say whereas many people are bilingual around 30% would choose Russian as their first language. Thank you very much. Vice-Minister Darsalya, the floor is yours now with the same question about your national identity, the place of Soviet history. Thank you very much. Frankly speaking, I was preparing to answer a lot of questions but this is the question I have no idea how to answer because I don't know what is Soviet. So it's difficult for me to answer what is post-Soviet. When talking about the Georgia, it's definitely, for me, it's something like, for example, answering the question, is France post-British Empire because during 100 years in Middle Ages it was occupied by Britain or something. So it's so distant from us that in spite of 30 years that I definitely would not qualify Georgia as the post-Soviet country. And only space where we can talk about post-Soviet if something's like this and if there is such a concept behind, there is post-Soviet in Russian occupied territories and what is anything Soviet you can refer to these places. But this 80% of Georgia which is not unoccupied definitely would not qualify under that. And frankly speaking, it's even a bit not how to say. I would not say insulting but not proper after so many, after three decades even talking about are these countries post-Soviet or different. Thank you, Mr. Dostoe.