 Yes. I want to make this one more point about Sweden joining NATO, because this is, I think, a big deal, which I don't think is played enough, is discussed enough in the media and among strategic analysts. Russia is a country that has limited access to the Atlantic Ocean. It is a country with ambitions, with global ambitions. It's a country that has a large navy and has global ambitions with regard to that navy. And yet it has limited access to the Atlantic Ocean. We'll talk about the Pacific Ocean in a minute. It has basically two points of entry. One is through the Black Sea, and then it has to pass through straits that are controlled 100% by Turkey, Turkey being a NATO member, the trade. And then it has to go through the Mediterranean, Mediterranean having its entire northern shore controlled by NATO members, and then pass through the straits of Gibraltar controlled by, to some extent, at least a NATO member and only then go into the Atlantic Ocean. That's one. I guess there's a third path. So the second path, we'll get the second path is in a season where the Arctic Ocean is not frozen, it can come in from the north. It can come in from its northern bases on the Arctic Ocean, come in from the north through the northern Atlantic. But that's difficult in winter, often impossible. But one of the main ways in which it enters the Atlantic is through the Baltic Sea. So let's look at a map of the Baltic Sea. So here you see a map of the Baltic Sea. And you can see that Russia has two basic entry points into the Baltic Sea. One from the St. Petersburg area through the Gulf of Finland, it can travel, its navy can travel into the Baltic Sea and then from the Baltic Sea through the gap between Denmark and Sweden, it can travel into the Atlantic. The other place is Kaliningrad. Kaliningrad is a little island, not an island literally surrounded by sea, but a little island in the sense that it's not connected to the rest of Russia, but it is part of Russia, which sits between Poland and Lithuania. Poland and Lithuania and so it's completely isolated and the Russians have a significant port there and that port again allows them access into the Baltic Sea and out into the North Sea, which is ultimately the path to the Atlantic Ocean. Notice what happens when Finland and Sweden join NATO. I mean, basically the Baltic Sea becomes what some people are calling a NATO lake. I mean, the Russian fleet can be completely blocked by the Swedes near Copenhagen there. It can be, you know, the Gulf of Finland can be completely controlled by Finland and Estonia, where you see Helsinki and Thailand on the other side, completely barking it. I mean, basically the Russians are completely isolated from the Atlantic Ocean through the Baltic Sea and indeed completely isolated in the Baltic Sea itself, a massive strategically important place for them. Now, you know, Sweden, the importance of Sweden joining not only the Sweden produce, I've said this many times, produce military equipment, but Sweden has a significant submarine fleet, which basically controls the Baltic Sea. Now, Sweden is a part of NATO. In other words, NATO has a submarine fleet controlling the Baltic Sea. No way it controls the Norwegian sea, which would be the access from the Baltic Circle. Turkey controls access to the Black Sea. Basically, if NATO wanted to, NATO could cut Russia off completely with very little effort from the Atlantic Ocean. And this is a major strategic issue. It's a major strategic advantage NATO has over Russia. And this kind of sets Russia back in terms of any kind of ambitions that they have to be a global power, any kind of ambitions that they have to exert influence outside of Russia, particularly exert influence on Europe. But even to get somewhere like Africa is not easy for them, not easy for them, at least by sea. So, I've said this so many times, but it bears repeating. Finland and Sweden joining NATO is massive, massive. It is a strategic defeat for Putin, a massive strategic defeat for Putin. Now, I want you to show you one other map, and this is a map, whoops, close that. I don't know what the hell that is. This is a map. I did not intend to do that. Sorry. This is a map of Russia. And you can see that the scale of Russia is in a massive country. And you can see that it has access obviously to the Arctic Ocean, but that's a very difficult place to access and often frozen over. And in order to get to the Atlantic, they would have to go along the Norwegian coast. So, Norway has access to it. On the other side, they would have to go via Alaska, which is difficult. But really, the other access Russia has is to the Pacific, and it has a very extensive shoreline on the Pacific. But this is the challenge that the Russians have on the Pacific side. That area is mostly empty. Russia's population centers, industry centers are all in the West, not in the East. They're all Moscow, St. Petersburg, that kind of area, not way out in the eastern Russian in Siberia. There's very little there. So, yes, Russia has this lengthy Pacific coast. Not much they can do with it. In addition, you know, Russia's foot was with Japan and lost. And the real power when you look at the Pacific coast is not Russia. The real power, if you look at Asia here, this part of northern and eastern Asia, is not Russia as much as the Russians would like to believe it is. But the real power here is China. And indeed, if you are in Kazakhstan, or Uzbekistan, or Kyrgyzstan, or any of the stands, and you have an historical alliance with Russia, an historical connection with Russia, because they occupied you when they were the USSR, and maybe occupied you during the Russian Empire. Now, when you look at Putin, when you look at Russia, when you look at the failure, when you look at NATO growing, when you look at everything else, who are you more likely to align with? A dying empire, a dying geopolitical force, Russia, which can offer you very little, or relatively, suddenly relatively to Russia, a dynamic thriving economy, which wants to trade extensively with you, even if you have to give up a little bit of sovereignty, which is China. Kazakhstan is much more likely to move in the direction of being under the influence of China than returning to the influence of Russia. Basically, what Putin has done in a very, very short period of time is he has weakened Russia so much, he has basically killed any kind of Russian ambition in terms of any kind of geopolitical ambitions that the Russians might have. It's finished. It's over. There is nothing. China doesn't trust Putin. China has no interest in Putin. China is aligned with Russia only to the extent that it gets some cheap oil and cheap natural gas, only to the extent that it gets them there. China knows and believes that it's fossil fuel. It's anything China has to offer. China believes it is the future. Russia is the distant past. The real force in Asia is China, maybe India. Russia is in decline and it's always been in decline. It's been declined since the fall of the USSR in terms of a projection of power, but what Putin has done is he's accelerated the visibility of that. He's accelerated our awareness of that. The world now knows. And you can see it, by the way, one of the elements of this is India. The India Modi is traveling around the world. He's just in France now buying weapons systems from everybody, except the Russians, except the Russians. All right.