 The biggest story right now is everybody is kind of on pins and needles, everybody is in suspense about what the Biden administration will choose to do with regard to responding to the death of the three soldiers over the weekend in their base in Jordan, a drone attack by Iranian connected militias. The Biden administration has said that they will hold Iran responsible, but they've also said and they've been very clear and they've gone out of their way to say that they do not want to expand the conflict, they don't want to turn this into a war, they don't want to go to war with Iran, please no war. You know basically, Blinken has repeated over and over again that quote, escalation is in no one's interests and quote, no one wants to see more funds opened in this conflict. Well I want to call BS on the Biden administration, escalation is in the United States interest opening up another front in this conflict is necessary because that front is already open. Iran is clearly the aggressor across multiple fronts. It was the funder, motivator, inspirer and giver of I think permission for his ballot for Hamas to do what they did on October 7th. It is responsible for what is going on in Gaza right now and to some extent you could argue that the blood of Israeli soldiers but also the blood of Palestinian civilians is on Iran, the Iranian regime. Iran is responsible for the Houthis attacking civilian ships, carrying civilian cargo through the Red Sea and blocking the sea lanes and obstructing, obstructing trade. The Houthis are Iran's responsibility to put aside the horror and the damage and the destruction that the Houthis have inflicted on Yemen, their own country itself. Iran's responsibility, that's a front, that's an Iranian front. What are we doing about it? Israel's doing something about Hamas but not much about the Houthis. Rezbalah would not be attacking Israel almost on a daily basis without approval from Iran. Iran has already opened another front with Israel on the northern border and Israel so far is doing a tit for tat, tit for tat, tit for tat, tit for tat, which is what Blinken is basically suggesting the United States do. Iran has launched a systematic attacks on US bases in Iraq, Syria and Jordan. And whether again you think the United States should be in Iraq, Syria or Jordan or not, Iran has no sovereignty there. Iran is not responsible for kicking the Americans out. Iran should not be the one launching attacks. Iran is at a state of war with the United States. So you don't want to escalate, Iran is escalating all the time. The only reason only three Americans have been killed so far is because the anti-air defenses of the Americas is pretty good and because of our intelligence, primarily satellite intelligence, we get notified in advance when they're going to attack and people hide in bunkers. But Iranian intent is to kill lots of Americans, not just three. And Iran is only going to escalate more the weaker we appear. Iran will only do more if the United States does not respond, does not do anything. Now, Biden will respond. But it'll be the same response as we've gotten for the last 40 years, a few missiles into some deserted warehouses or taking out a few particular weapons sites or something like that. God forbid, make sure you don't kill anybody. Maybe they'll kill an Iranian Republican God here or there. It's going to be weak. Blinken is basic. He's saying it's weak. We don't want. Please, Iranians, whatever we do right now, realize we do not want to escalate. Please remember, we don't want to open another front in this war. He's signaling. So just don't take anything we do right now as too seriously, please. We have to respond because it's like the tit-for-tat, tit-for-tat thing in American public, the kind of stuff the three American soldiers died. So we have to do something. But don't take it too seriously, Iranians. These Iranians, we beg, really pathetic, pathetic. One of three men says, watch the recent Nikki Haley interviews on the subject. Nikki Haley is by far, by far the best politician I've heard on these issues. Again, she has her problems. And the main one was the stupid anonymity privacy issue on the internet. But in terms of dealing with Iran, she is by far the best politician on this issue. She should be the Republican nominee. She should be the next president of the United States. And maybe because of all those shoulds, she will now. American people are not in a mood to actually elect somebody with leadership skills, are not in the mood to actually elect somebody who would actually confront our enemies and actually deal with them. They're in the mood of hunkering down and sticking their head very, very, very deep into a pile of shit. Well, into a pile of sand, but in this case, given who they're going to elect, it's a pile of shit. American needs to escalate. The Iranian threat needs to be dealt with. It needs to be dealt with in a way that's unequivocal. It needs to be dealt with in a way that the message the United States is sending cannot be questioned. It needs to be dealt with so that the Iranians will never attack an American again. That's how it needs to be dealt with. It won't be dealt with like that, which means the entire leadership infrastructure of Iran needs to be taken out. Every single location in which the United States believes that there's nuclear, nuclear weapon development should be destroyed. Every single factory that is building a drone should be taken out. And here I include factories and nuclear facilities that are in populated areas. The Iranian national, what do you call it, Republican God, needs to be destroyed. It's leadership taken out. And that would be enough, right? And no troops on the ground. Don't eat troops on the ground. There's an excellent article today by Elliot Cohen in the Atlantic magazine, and it basically states a truth, a absolute truth, and that is that Iran cannot be conciliated. That is the title of the article. America segmented, limited, and naive policy towards Iran continues to fail. The US needs to try something new. And the try something new is to destroy this regime. Since 2003, as he points out, the Iranians have worked diligently to attack American forces in Iraq, their weapons have killed Americans, their proxies have killed Americans, their revolutionary God, it's not, I keep calling them the Iraqi Republican God, it's a revolutionary God, the Iranian revolutionary God, coordinates all these efforts to attack Americans, to kill Americans, to destroy American facilities, and to thwart American efforts in the Middle East. And that needs to be ended, and the only way to end that is not through negotiation. It is through military action. Let me just say, the Biden administration, as we speak through back channels, continues to try to negotiate a deal with Iranians. As will Obama Iran, they will continue to negotiate. Most of the Iranian team in the Biden administration are former Obama team that negotiated the first horrible deal, and they are trying to negotiate another deal now. If you listen to Bolton, and Bolton is saying, Bolton is being asked, what would Trump do about Iran? And Bolton's argument, again, Bolton had a deep experience with Trump on all these issues. Bolton is saying Trump would try to negotiate a deal. He would try to show that he can cut a better deal. Trump would not destroy the Iranian regime. He would not respond any more aggressively than probably Biden is going to. He would just try to cut a deal, just a different deal, his kind of deal. He's the dealmaker. Remember, he's the guy who ran to North Korea to meet with its leader, rather than confront him. He's the guy who trusts Putin more than he trusts American intelligence agencies. He's the guy who is jealous of Xi's, the fact that everybody stands up when Xi walks in the room. Isn't that cool? All right. By the way, nothing of this has anything to do with Israel, zero, zilch. And everything to do with American self-interest. This crisis started in 1979 when I told Khomeini took over Iran. That had nothing to do with Israel. The hostages in the American embassy had nothing to do with Israel. I mean, it is a typical deflection of and, and, and the disgustingly anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic to constantly blame Israel for America's failures in foreign policy. The troops in Jordan have nothing to do with Israel. The invasion of Iraq, as wrong as it was, and as stupid as it was, had nothing to do with Israel. 9-11 was not Israel's fault. And you can continue to pretend some of you out there, you can continue to live in a fantasy world that blames Israel for American weakness, that blames Israel for the lack of American strategic thinking when it comes to the threat that it faces in the Middle East. And for those of you who are really interested, Sam Harris has an excellent, excellent podcast that he just put up I think a day ago on the myths around what's going on in Israel right now that relates what's going on right now in Israel to the global jihadist movement and the global jihadist war against the West. It is excellent. Sam Harris on these issues is fantastic. And everybody should listen to it, share it, distribute it widely as you can. All right, we will see. I mean, the Middle East is a mess. And Biden is definitely the wrong president to be in the midst of this. He is just too weak. And politically, he's torn in too many directions, right? He's got to try to appease the Jews. He's got to try to appease the left. You know, they're in Michigan. If he wants to win Michigan, he wants to get the Arab vote in Michigan. The Muslim vote in Michigan, which is non-trivial in the state of Michigan, he has to appease his crazy left. He has to appease and on top of that, the guy can't think, right? And he's got a team of appeases when it comes to foreign policy.