 Rwy'n meddwl gwybod. Y cwestiynau eich ymgyrch yn ymgyrch, 8.626.2, yn y cair Leol, sy'n meddwl i'r ffairfawr 8.626 yn y cymdeithas ymgyrch ac yn y cymdeithasol a'r ffairfawr yn ddigwydd, mae'r ffairfawr yn ddigwydd. Mae'r ffairfawr yn ddigwydd. Ymgyrch yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch, 8.626.2, yn y cair Leol, mae'r ffairfawr 47, ond mae'r ffairfawr yn ddigwydd yn y cymdeithasol. Mae'r ffairfawr gwestiynau ymgyrch yn y cymdeithasol, oedden nhw, a'r ffairfawr 801, nid yw gwazdeithasol yn y cymdeithasol yn gyd yn y cymdeithasol, ond mae'r ffairfawr 8.626 yn y cymdeithasol, ond mae'r ffairfawr yn dyma dros y cymdeithasol a'r ffairfawr yn fer iawn. Rwy'n meddwl i'r ffairfawr, Felly, mae'r ddifodl iawn yn fawr bydd ar y covidol i leidio adrynu'r arfer. Ieithio'r cyhoeddbu yn gweithio. Mae'r ddifodl iawn yn fawr pan ddifodl iawn yn fawr. Rwein, mae'r ddifodl iawn yn gweithio ar gweithiol, mae'r ddifodl iawn yn gweithio ar glimau The Parliament is not agreed and we will now move to a vote and members should cast the vote now. The vote is now closed. Christina McKelvie, point of order. Thank you, Presiding Officer. My device will not connect to the server and I would have voted yes. Thank you. Thank you Ms McKelvie and your vote will be recorded. The result of the vote on motion 8626 in the name of Mary McCallan is yes, 94, no, 0, abstain, 16 and the motion is therefore agreed to. That concludes decision time. Point of order, Edward Mountain. Thank you, Presiding Officer. During First Minister's questions today, the First Minister in reply to Jamie Halcro Johnston's question about the Coron Ferry said, and I quote, It is our MOD, our tax Scottish taxpayers' money, of course, that helps fund the MOD. Inferring, there would be no cost if the MOD helped with the Coron Ferry. Members, I need to hear Mr Mountain's point of order, thank you. Just for clarification purposes, the MOD is charged to defend the United Kingdom and it is budget for that. However, the request for assistance for the Coron Ferry has been made through a military aid to the civil authorities request. My understanding is that MACA assists civil authorities and it's up to the military to ascertain if the assets are available and fit for deployment. It is normally up to the civil authorities to cover the costs of these deployments in line with HM Treasury rules, though the MOD, of course, may defer costs. It is therefore unclear in this case whether the costs will be met by the Scottish Government or the Highland Council. Presiding Officer, I raised the point of clarification for the First Minister because I believe that he may have inadvertently misled the Parliament. If you don't like to hear the point of order, you can leave. Inferring that the payment is required. Members, we have a member on the floor that member has the right to speak and the other people in the chamber don't speak when somebody else has got the floor. Mr Mountain, please continue. I raised the clarification with you as the First Minister may have inadvertently misled the Parliament, inferring that no payment would be required if the MOD were deployed. I'd therefore be grateful if you could set out how the First Minister may correct the record if that is the case. I thank Mr Mountain for his contribution. I would advise that that is not a point of order. It's not a matter for the chair. The process for correction of the record is well known to members, I believe, across the chamber. I'm very grateful, Presiding Officer. During a ministerial statement today, the minister longs later suggested that she applied for an exemption from the UK Parliament in 2021 and that the delay to the DRS scheme is because of that. I can inform the chamber—I had checked this—that ministers have only received that formal request for a UKI Act Exclusion from the Scottish Government deposit return scheme on 6 March 2023. Since then, the Scottish Government has been reviewing, it has now paused the scheme so it has not been possible for the UK Government to fully assess the impacts of the exclusion request on cross-UK trade businesses and consumers. I seek your advice, Presiding Officer, because surely that is mislead the Parliament. We all know that it was done on 6 March 2023 and not 2021. I think that I would ask if the minister could come in and correct the record, please. I thank Mr Whittle for his contribution. That is also not a point of order, as it is not a matter for the chair. Again, I would repeat that the mechanism by which the record can be corrected is presumably also well known to Mr Whittle. I would say that that concludes decision time. There will be a short pause before we move on to the final item of business, which is members' business debate.