 this presentation half of the main part, first of all our background in the topic, particularly to work with vulnerability areas in Madrid regional project. Our experience is very special in this case because in the case of the Madrid regional project the circumstance of vulnerability are very different than another context and our experience is more similar that you have that is usually with people with better training or classical education or occidental education. This is the case of Museo, this is the case of the school, this is a case of this kind of context but in these areas it's a little different. We explain with a case that has to has relation with archaeological aspect, this is the case of Alcalá de Nares, I try to explain something about archaeological site and the gotham with this kind of neighborhood and finally to to insist in the idea that we are starting with this kind of study but we have to continue because we have a lot of problems with methodologies and the way that we are working in the line of participatory processes. The origin of the project is with the case of the study of working in these cities that we are working especially with the idea of archaeological heritage management and we try to work in Latin America and Spain with case concerning to improve the urban archaeology and at the same time the project of vulnerability participation and citizenship is about resilience and try to to know better the social problem in this in this area and and concerning the overwork in community involvement we have experience because we are working for 2010 in a lot of projects and I think I would like to insist in the idea of participation here and participation process it because I think it's a little different to the fashion or to education and that we are another experience in this case but participation have to suppose to try to to establish relationship more horizontal with people and that people can change our narratives and make decisions in the same level of responsibility that we share. And I think this is the change of the model this is the difference no and we have a lot of experience of course I have not explained here but to understand a little bit but I insist in the idea that in the culture of vulnerability we are only working in Latin America in Cuba and Mexico in the city of Lavana and in the city of Puebla they are two world heritage sites but in this context the vulnerability is a little different because these sites are very monumental and very famous for cultural heritage values and at the same time the population is mixed because you have a social vulnerability and you have community with a lot of problems but at the same time you have visitors, tourists and rich people. In the case of the region of Madrid it's a little different because the area is not a special archaeological sorry cultural heritage site or world heritage site. In the case of Alcana del Andres it's close to the city center but it's out of the city center and then our interests of our object are similar both cases no we try to to to know the disappointment we try to correlate this attachment cultural heritage with this kind of people and at the same time we have we try to look for new ways to understand cultural heritage to understand our past common that is not only the scientific point of view of this no that that is the the idea I would like to show this definition of for to to live in there in it but I think the important here of the idea of vulnerable neighborhood or at least the important for me is that this kind of neighborhood have an opportunity to to improve the situation no because it's the limited the limit of the of a good life or a better life or not I think for us it's very important to work in in this context in the context of this project because we are not archaeologists it's not the protagonist cultural heritage is not the most important here we are a small small part of the project the role of archaeologists is small but for me this is the best of the project because we have to to get introduced in projects of sociologists architects and to introduce cultural values in this context no in this kind of of the research in this case the objective of the project here the summary of the general plan no and the intention is to describe unlock all and locate in the region of Madrid these vulnerable areas and to try to to to know how can improve the lead of the project is my colleague Marta Domínguez he's a sociologist and it is the research team we are working for research team another research team of sociology is about international immigration another is about architecture and social housing and finally our research team that the part of cultural heritage is in my share the general methodology of the project is very classical in sociological studies one part the most important part what the quantitative analysis to define vulnerable neighborhood you can guess I don't know about statistical data a lot one thousand of the of indication that I am they are working to define this kind of of areas in in Madrid and after that we start to work with qualitative analysis in our case with part of participatory action but in all these neighborhood with interviews and try to contrast the the documentation with the field work no and to contrast the the situation then this is the result of quantitative analysis that is a very hard prophecy that the sociology divide the ability of the social profile of the people in two main profiles that is with areas with ethnic diversity and all that that are more of the people know that um we detected around 500 neighborhood in Madrid but around 100 have problems with reliability as you can see the division of the problem know with this topic but for me the most important here we can question you know the methodology the terminology of all that that you want I think it's supposed that one million people in our region live in vulnerability condition the region of Madrid is around eight million of people know that is a lot of people know I think that is the the important here the reason I have no time to explain better but you can understand more lately there is two study 10 years and in in one kind of neighborhood persisting the problem in other high the problem increase and in other the less improved no and then we have the problem with this kind of area is uh motivate because in most of them have uh infrastructure school even health center a little public space a green space that's sometimes not very bad but uh social and cultural values values uh are not working no um that is the idea to to continue this is Madrid the region of Madrid not only the capital it's only the all the region this is the the map where different municipalities and you can see the color the green area is not the problem because it is the rural area natural area and in fact people have less problem but all the population are concentrating the center of the community and the different color that you can see is uh blue and orange color at the best condition social condition uh this is a middle class orange color and blue colors are rich people no more less no that is the idea our protagonist of here is in in the areas of red color and purple color more because i have no time to to the pad you can email here that is our for qualitative um analysis uh we select see that that is the the axis of the thing i change the order okay we selected uh seven neighborhood to to make the interviews with sociological technical and in this interview we have three axis and as you can read here both of them are focusing sociological art and architecture even public policy talking three minutes okay and the other part is cultural heritage that our objective you more or less know and we the interesting here is we everybody make the interviews sociologists are heated and all are together not one part for cultural heritage and work part we understand and then uh we selected this uh uh neighborhood to to work with these interviews and in the ball is the neighborhood when we are making another kind of of of work not only interviews or statistical data they use this is the in these three neighborhood we are working several topics and the example that i would like to comment one line is alcaladin others because the neighborhood is close to uh an archaeological site that you can see this is the neighborhood and this is the archaeological area and this is the neighborhood part of the district of or of this area um as you can see we have a a team very strong team that you think it's very important too for this practical work and i think a lot of people in here in this area it's impossible only archaeologists to work in this line no we need to combine this kind of specialist and i would like to to say thank you for a very corporate and Daniel Sanchez archaeology and they made a strong field work with with me and another colleague no and then the important of this archaeological site here is a roman and archaeological site is um they have a lot of barriers they they even wall and people who live in the area are not interested in this archaeological site because uh have another problem uh this is the the style of the this kind of neighborhood in in general our research question i have no repeat because the objectives are similar that i explained but uh we show you the methodology that we are working in this area with participatory action research and we are finished the second cycle uh today and as you can see uh we made a lot of effort to to make a new narrative to connect the neighborhood with archaeological site but not only this to construct the new uh the new history of the of this um area no and for this we make a lot of techniques social procession and study etc even participatory activity in public part that this is in classical in our research team for a lot of years well a lot of years from this last year and we are contrast the narrative that we made for people um um we facilitate the information to reproducing for them um we propose several things as i have not explained here because i think it's not the most important no the idea is to to continue with this kind of uh of re-hare and because we need we need to define better our technical methodology in this case but for me my the the the worries the don't howl and the people who work with uh archaeological heritage or once they go home and finish uh this site they are not interested in this proven project because uh they think this is not uh actually this is not cultural heritage you know and this is the strong problem uh for them uh the management or archaeological site or another aspect of cultural heritage in the municipality have not to eat with people i don't know but that is the the the real situation uh we are happy with the result of the project because in general the narrative that we made for people uh we can contrasting with different techniques like participatory action and people that are okay agree agree with our conclusion or our proposal but we need more time even we are concerned we are working with sociology this aspect of the problem uh with some sector in the case is or the same it's sad to say but my experience is the same this community we have a lot of problem to integrate in the initiative and the they participate in this anyway i think thank you so much for your passion for that english i hope you more or less understand my presentation but i think i encourage you to try to look for this kind of project where archaeologists and cultural heritage are not the protagonists it's one thing more and i think it's the new position of the archaeology and the profession and not as facilitator and look for for for experience where we can integrate different values or resources in in over life and nothing else if you want to to contact with me or we see uh follow our group here on information