 by just emphasizing the point of community that emerges around these platforms. And the tagline for the commons and it has been since it was launched is what will you build? And I think it's really important at this conference and in other spaces for us to critically consider the ends that we seek with openness, right? It's great to save students money on textbooks. That's a really valuable pursuit, right? It's great to have open access publications and to let knowledge be free. These are positive things, but we feel also that a lot is asked of openness. And I'd like to thank one of my students, Joe Thompson, who's an open educational resources librarian at CUNY and an adjunct who wrote a blog post about this just this week in our ITP course that I'll share here in the comments or try to. Jim, actually I put it in the chat if you don't mind sharing that post. I think it just does a wonderful job of raising this question, right? Because we are very much in a conflict over the future of the university system. We've been, everyone knows we've been fighting austerity for a generation. And this team and the work that we do in our comrades at the Open Lab, at City Tech and at BMCC and in other spaces throughout CUNY very much see open infrastructure as the space from which we can think and organize our response to proprietary incursions on the work that we do in the university. And frankly we can fight for the soul of the university in the future of the university. It allows us to exert more influence over the labor dynamics and the intellectual property dynamics of the work that happens and not to cede those questions to the administrative spaces that are disconnected from the core ethos of the university which Matt laid out. So we very much see this open infrastructure as a necessary precondition for the work that we want to do, right? Openness is a valuable end in and of itself but openness itself is not going to transform the university. And these platforms have allowed us to bring new populations, new disciplines, new learners and thinkers into that conversation with us. And it is a long game. It takes a long time for you to build community and for that community to develop trust and ways of working. And I'm just really appreciative of Matt's leadership on this at the Commons since almost 15 years he's been working on this stuff from the perspective of the Commons. And it takes that kind of persistence, commitment and vision to break us out of the semester by semester cycles of reporting and impact demonstration that open investments often require to justify themselves and ramp.