 All right moving on from culture. We also fall into politics and this is where we get into the law of the land And this is when politics lives downstream of culture culture will guide our laws And if our culture was feminine base awarded women special privileges and removed accountability from it What do you think our laws are doing? By the way, this is where men truly get hurt It's not just that you're gonna take a financial hit It's that that your sense of a man is being able to provide is actually under attack You've been found to be unsuitable. All right, and because the marriage Is is truly only valuable in an economic sense. Men are particularly hard hit by it Both on a psychological emotional level and a financial level and because that we can see the the astronomical increase in depression rates We also see the astronomical rise in suicides You don't see that correlating with women as emotionally distraught as they may be all right and And so one of the things that we can look at as far as culture and what our politics and laws are telling us is not just that Marriages are disposable and they are they're readily disposable You know the running joke with lawyers is you know the divorce divorce is worth it because it's so valuable You know it's it's it's worth paying for is that it's not just that it's disposable Men taking one step back looking at the the legal context in which they're living are really analyzing that marriage isn't necessary It is completely not required to be loved appreciated to have have a relationship life-long relationship It's not necessary to actually have children and raise healthy a productive adults It's advisable for a number of reasons in their studies But you're actually better off not getting married because you're better protected outside of the law than you actually are as men And that's a scary thing You know, you know, we can look at the divorce statistics. The secondary case would be child custody 80% of the time women get custody even though as men with higher EQ Requirements with with a greater demand of your involvement in your child's life as a father Emotional development, you're expected to be there our courts and on the last 20 years have not changed in the percentage of awardees of child custody nor visitation Gender rights have not kept up with the times We can also talk about alimony if if marriages are disposable at will and Merit leak and marable marriage Spousal supports obligation and at marriage. What is the point of actually supplying? Additional financial incentives and I also reserves as far as funding their lifestyles after marriage What is the point of actually doing it in some cases? There are actually some genuine ones, but overall There's not about keeping women afloat. It's not about, you know The social contract and the construction which the laws were actually formally They have not kept up with the time in which women are actually higher educated than men when women are actually making more money On a on per basis of job They may have choose other careers that afforded them other lifestyle choices of Comfort of socialization of a number of things, you know, but that's a choice men typically sacrifice So you have a have a causal effect that alimony is really wealth management's wealth redistribution You know, and we're not the only society that does it's interest in a skin and navy doesn't have that in many cases You know, which is actually kind of a unique way of looking at things The last one was will actually there will be two more another one It is going to be looking at your sexual rights as far as reproduction goes You know, I talked about you actually have more rights to your intellectual property rights than you do your DNA Once you lose control of your DNA, it's over a woman's body a woman's choice But a woman's choice can actually incur after it's no longer her body Post delivery of the child. She has the right to be able to sign away parental parental rights and and financial support arrangements At will be able to give the child up for adoption. A man has no right to that You are tied to her decision at no point anywhere in the process are you allowed to sign off on your rights and obligations to that child? Now I'm not saying it's it's right, but we don't have gender parity on this Beyond that a man who actually claimed lays claim to child custody for a woman who's given rights up to a child Cannot sue for child support payments in a way in which a woman can Again non-gender gender parity and again, we're not even allowed to discuss these things let alone come to conclusions We're not simply allowed to discuss them That's that there's no justice in that. There's no equity