 All right, good evening everyone. I will call the 23rd Regular Common Council meeting to order with the clerk state the quote of the evening. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Start where you are, use what you have, do what you can. Thank you. Will the clerk call the roll? All the person Ackley. Excused. All the person Decker. Here. All the person Feldy. All the person Feldy. We'll come back. All the person Flicky Paneski. All the person Heidemann. All the person Mitchell. All the person Pirella. All the person Ramey. All the person Rust. All the person Salazar. All the person Feldy. Present. Thank you. Thanks, Mark. All right, thanks. If folks could please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. All right. All right. Item three, a resignation. Older Decker. Oh, excuse me, city attorney. Sorry. One resignation, Amanda Salazar from the Room Tax Commission and the Transit Commission, effective March 5, 2024. Older Decker. I move to accept and file. Moved and seconded. All those in favor? Aye. Any objections? That's approved. Next item four, city attorney. The mayor submits the following appointments for your confirmation. Julia Hart to be considered for appointment to the library board. Michael van der Steen to be considered for appointment to the citizen's board of review. Mark Mahoney to be considered for appointment to the sustainability task force. And Alder Zach Rust to be considered for appointment as the chair for the Licensing, Hearing and Public Safety Committee, effective March 5, 2024. Thank you. Older Decker. Thank you, mayor. I move to confirm. Thank you. Moved and seconded. Any discussion? Seeing none, this will be a roll call vote. Alder Felde? Yes. Nine eyes. Thank you. Those are approved. Next minutes from our last meeting. Alder Decker. Thank you, mayor. I move to approve the minutes from the 22nd regular council meeting held on February 19, 2024. Moved and seconded. This will be a voice vote. All those in favor of approving the minutes from our last meeting, state aye. Aye. Any objection? Minutes are approved. City Clerk, anyone for public forum? We have two people this evening. The first one, Mike Burnett. Thank you, Mr. Burnett. You want to come to the podium, state your name, address, and you'll have five minutes. All right. Mike Burnett, 1406 Michigan Avenue. And OK. So in February 2006, developers arrived at the Sherard Village Board meeting to discuss the creation of Fire Lake Gulf Resort and Housing Development. Claude Lewis is one of the developers to explain to village officials that by creating a tax increment financing district and it's a nearby land and issuing millions in bonds was a no-lose proposition for the tiny town. Lewis Clay really is no risk to the village at all. You're really echoing the same statements Lewis would make repeatedly to mountain pleasant officials and residents a few years later about Foxconn. Lewis began building the Tiff-Sherard created as a consultant for each of his day trips to the area, which were piling up at $1,500 a piece. The cave was basically $338,000 a year. You have here, it's like to book Foxconn demonstrates that Lewis does indeed have an extraordinary track record in economic development. Having been party to a rec-tift about Sherard, Illinois which Lewis was generously compensated long after the project had failed, which also sent his business colleagues to prison for conspiracy and fraud and forced the federal government to shutter a local bank implicated in the activity. And then you go on to Foxconn, which is what I was originally starting with here. And I don't know if this'll... Even worse, that book reveals the symphony of public money by consultants, contractors, and attorneys that's still taking place in spite of the project's universal failure in August 2017. Okay, well, bottom line. Okay, then I'll just do most stuff. And it's like, all right. But basically he was the guy with Foxconn. He basically, his role with Burlington, he was a part-time mayor in a city that was bound to boom no matter what, making $7,200 a year. He got hired in, he was on both sides of the development triangle on the one I just talked to. He was also the Foxconn guy and he made nearly a million dollars for Capurin associates in one year of billing. And almost all of that, but about $10,000 was to him with no records on time spent or whatever. And basically I'm talking, you're pounding all these tiffs through coming, but he's gonna be a major role. He's gonna be replacing both Dave Bebel, Department of Public Works, and there in 1984, up until 27 years possibly from today where none of the improvements in value of property shows up on the general tax role. It's all rolled back into the district. I went around town yesterday and went through, and it's obvious. I mean, basically one of the parking garages, one of the $15 million ones will basically be the old ATT bell telephone thing that's connected to the Sheboygan Press. And because I spoke on that 12 years ago when I had a consultant, no, five years ago when I had a consultant in my car as an Uber driver and he was telling me he was coming here because they were gonna push that through. The other one's likely to be that little car lot next door to the post office. The post office is almost decisively leaving, but we've had a TIS district for that long and it's all in, oh, it's gonna create value, create value. It takes from services from the whole city, I mean, from school district and everywhere. That money doesn't show up forever. And Toby Watson was at the meeting before and he mentioned he's probably the biggest landholder in the history of Sheboygan Town Town and he had concerns because he didn't really know anything about what's going on. And one of his concerns is probably it artificially inflates property values and basically that could be a huge tax lift for him. But when you're doing all these projects, nothing's rolled out with the city. You're rolling the bridge to Noor in there. I spoke about that however many years ago when they were gonna pass it through, but it's like it keeps on coming, it keeps on coming. And I mean, there's millions to Van Horn, half a million or so to the hotel I can't even think Lecinta and all this stuff. And it's like, well, nothing would be done otherwise. Nothing should be done. $30 million again for the marina, you're rolling in most of the downtown. Mr. Burnett, your time's expired. All right. Thank you. City Clerk, anyone else? Second person is Brian Kelly. All right, Brian, then you'll have five minutes. You just wanna introduce yourself and state your address, please. My name is Brian Kelly. I live on 2006, South 9th Street. Can you pull the mic down a little bit? Thank you. First off, I just wanted to say I'm happy to see that Sheboygan has a lot of plans and investing in his future. I do have a couple of concerns about how that's done. First off, with these four tids that are being discussed, I saw that each one states that it complies with the city's comprehensive plan. When I tried to find that, the only thing I could find was from 2011 and it sounds like that should be updated every 10 years. So it seems like it's three years out of date, so I'm a little concerned about the city moving forward with 20 to 27 year investments with that plan being a little out of date. Next, on TID 21, I'm assuming that 2019 River Bend plan is what's informing some of the reconstruction on that Commerce Street. In that plan, the residents of the area expressed concern about 14th Street and its safety. Since 2018, there have been three fatal accidents in that neighborhood. So I mean, in addition to that, there were three accidents that resulted in pedestrians and bike users being injured. So I'm not sure. These tids were pretty broad. It seems like improvements to safety there could be addressed with the lighting expense that was listed. It could be part of the Commerce Street reconstruction. I don't know, but I would like to see the city address those residents' concerns as that area is built up. I'm assuming there's gonna be more pedestrian traffic there in the future. In terms of the parking structures that were talked about, it looked like there's $22 million referenced in that TID for those parking structures. Looks like those are scheduled for 2035 and 2045. The 2017 parking study that the city provided mentioned that parking utilization was only about 50% at peak times during that study. I'm sure a lot has changed since COVID and people moving since then. And then there's a lot of apartment buildings at one up. So maybe there's a need there. But at least from that study, it didn't show it. A potential use could be the downtown district's master plan that the city published in 2019. It recommended consolidating or doing infill in some of those areas to encourage higher density in the downtown. So I mean, I don't know what the city's goals are. So maybe that could be good, but I would just worry if the city's only plan was to add more parking if there isn't a parking study that shows that need. And then on the agenda, there was reference to the uptown parklet potentially becoming a permanent public space. I just wanted to show my support for that. I was at quite a few events there last year. I'm newer to the city, only been here about three years, but there were some really nice events there. So I wanna show my support for that, but I do know some of the business owners in that area had some recommendations for improving that site. So when the city plans its, I guess, orientation or layout of the parklet, I'd like the city to reach out to the business owners in that area to see if there's anything that they would suggest. Thank you, thanks. Any other city clerk? No one else this evening. Thank you. Okay, number seven, we have an announcement regarding an upcoming election for older person district three on March 18th. So applications to fill the vacant seat for district three will be due Thursday, March 14th by 4.30 p.m. Please send a cover letter and resume to the city clerk's office. And the city council will vote to fill that seat on March 18th to finish off the rest of the term by a ranked choice ballot. All right, next item eight we'll do Mayor's announcements. Daniel, come on up. This one I'm excited about. So if folks have been tuned in, folks know Dan Bogey as he goes by Bogenshoots from Sheboygan has been named the 26th member of the Green Bay Packers Fan Hall of Fame. So I have a proclamation to recognize this achievement that I'll read here. So Dan Bogey Bogenshoots from Sheboygan has been named the 26th member of the Green Bay Packers Fan Hall of Fame. And whereas he has exemplified unparalleled passion for the Green Bay Packers as evidenced by his selection among 10 finalists that saw more than 83,000 total votes cast throughout the world. Over the past 36 years, he has selfishly devoted himself to organizing packer trips and experiences for thousands of fans throughout the state, coordinating every detail, allowing others to experience the same packers that he loves. And not all 36 years have been the best years, but most of them been pretty good. Whereas his unwavering dedication to the Green Bay Packers transcends seasons and was proudly wearing green and gold and demonstrating his profound love and loyalty for the team. And whereas the city of Sheboygan is proud to support America's true team of the Green Bay Packers and its many fans that take active in the part throughout its ownership and devotion. Now I therefore, Ryan Sorenson by the authority vested in me as the mayor of the great city of Sheboygan to hereby recognize Dan Bogenshoots throughout the city of Sheboygan and condemn, excuse me, commend his commitment to the city of Sheboygan and the Green Bay Packers. So I just want to recognize Dan in his work of not only representing the city of Sheboygan, mentioning the city of Sheboygan and just being a great sport and ambassador for our city with the Green Bay Packers. So congratulations, Dan. And I'll give you this proclamation. That's it for you guys. Thank you everybody. This is really an honor for me and my family and for the city of Sheboygan. It was, I didn't, I thought it was a scam when I first got to you. Announcement that I was selected and there were 10 of us from all over the country and when they called Dan Bogenshoots, I was totally shocked. It's, I went up there on Saturday with my family. My name is in the hall of fame. My picture is in the hall of fame and the story. And it mentions Sheboygan, Wisconsin. And so forever, it will be in the Packer Hall of Fame. So Sheboygan will be mentioned and me. So I'm very proud of this. And I'd like to thank everybody that voted from Sheboygan and throughout the country and the world. And thank you everybody again. Thank you. So congrats, Dan. I know that not everyone in this room is a Green Bay Packers fan, but I think most of us are. So, again, I'm always excited because now we can say Sheboygan is an award-winning city. It always has been from folks like Dan representing our community. But I also wanna recognize a few more acknowledgments that the city has achieved last week. So the city of Sheboygan was nominated in three categories for the Chamber of Commerce annual gala. The city was nominated for the Working Together nomination. The Department of Public Works specifically was nominated for the Safety category. And then we were also nominated for the Tourism Gem of the Year award. And we won that award for tourism for 2023 for the Mercury Midwest Racing Challenge. So just wanna thank, again, all the support from city staff, the support from city council for making this event happening and recognizing our work in devotion as well on that one. So I'll have the award up here and folks wanna check it out as well as our nomination plaques for the other categories. So as well, I know there's been a lot of questions and information circulating around tids and tax incremental financing, just as a general PSA, more information on all the TID plans are on the city's website, under the business tab on the website. So please check those out and if folks have more questions, please feel free to reach out to city staff and we can help answer more questions. So thank you. All right, next. We have hearings. Okay, first hearing will open up is hearing number 723-24 scheduled for this evening for the purposes of mending the Sheboygan's official zoning ordinance for the purposes of amending the city's planned unit development process as to streamline it and make it more user friendly. Anyone wishing to be heard on this item? Brandon, if you just wanna reintroduce yourself for the minutes. Yep, my name is Brian Kelly. I live on 2006, South Ninth Street. So as I was reading through what this was, I saw that it was referenced in the, I think it was 2021 affordable housing study as a great way to offer flexibility for that land. I did also see right next to it, there was a section, there is a recommendation that the city also amend the zoning code to allow multifamily units as a permitted use in residential districts. So as the city is looking at improving its zoning code, I would ask that it also considers that. Seems like a great way to address the housing shortage in Sheboygan without putting additional load on the city administration or DPW to install more roads or water sewer, things like that. So, thank you. Thank you. Anyone else wishing to be heard on this item? Anyone else? Last call? Seeing none, Alderdecker. I move to close the hearing. Second. Moved and seconded. All those in favor, state aye. Any objection? That's approved. Next, hearing item 10, hearing number 8-23-24. Pursuit to the letter sent and notice is published by the city clerk. There is a hearing scheduled for this evening for the purposes to change the land use classification of property located west of 3512 Wilkes Avenue, parcel number 5921215833 from class suburban commercial to class, excuse me, from class suburban commercial to suburban commercial with a PUD overlay classification. Anyone wishing to be heard on this item? Anyone wishing to be heard? Anyone wishing to be heard? Last call, seeing none. Anyone wishing to be heard? Alderdecker. I move to close the hearing. Second. Moved and seconded. All those in favor of closing the hearing, state aye. Aye. Any objections? Aye. The hearing is closed. Next item, 11, hearing number 9-23-24. Pursuit to the letter sent and notice is published by the city clerk. There is a hearing scheduled this evening for the purposes of change the land use classification of property located at 3512 Wilkes Avenue, parcel number 5921215827 from class suburban commercial to suburban commercial with a PUD overlay classification. Anyone wishing to be heard on this item? Anyone wishing to be heard? Anyone wishing to be heard? Last call, anyone wishing to be heard? Alderdecker. Thank you, Mayor, I move to close the hearing. Moved and seconded. All those in favor of closing, state aye. Aye. Any objections? Aye. All right, the hearing is closed. All right, moving along. Consent agenda items 13-21, Alderdecker. Thank you, Mayor. I move to receive and file all ROs, receive all ROCs and adopt all resolutions and ordinances. Moved and seconded. Any discussion on any of the items in the consent agenda? Alderflicky Paneski. Thank you. I would just like to point out that consent number 15 regards the provision of documents to the Finance Committee from the Comptroller, Evan, who provided us with all of, they call them claims, but basically it's all of the bills that the city paid in the previous month and it's the first time we've seen that and it has to be a lot of work and we were told that we would see it month after month. So I would like to thank Evan and thank the Finance Department because that's part of good practice. Thank you for those comments. Additional comments or questions for the consent agenda? Seeing no more queues, this will be a roll call vote. Alderflicky Paneski. Thank you. Bye, nice. All right, those items are approved. All right, items 22 through 25, reports of officers, RO number 11720, so I'm gonna read all of them and then we're gonna take them together. Take one vote. Correct? Okay, so bear with me here. RO number 1172324 by the City Plan Commission to whom was referred resolution number 1632324 by older persons Mitchell and Flicky Paneski establishing the borders of and approving the project plan for TID increment, excuse me, tax increment district 21. Item 23, RO number 1182324 by the City Plan Commission to whom was referred resolution number 1642324 by older persons Mitchell and Flicky Paneski establishing the boundaries of and approving the project plan for tax increment district 22. Item 24, RO number 192324 by the City Plan Commission to whom was referred resolution number 1652324 by older persons Mitchell and Flicky Paneski establishing the boundaries of and approving the project plan for tax increment district number 23. RO number 122324 by the City Plan Commission to whom was referred resolution number 1662324 by older persons Mitchell and Flicky Paneski establishing the boundaries of and approving for the project plan for tax increment district 24, older Mitchell. Thank you, Mayor. Move to accept and file the arrows. Moved in second. Any discussion on any of the resolutions? All right, seeing none, this will be the voice vote, calls in favor, state aye. Aye. Any objections? Aye. Okay, those items are approved. Item 26 will lay over. Items 27 and 28 will be referred to the respective committees. Next item 29 resolution number 17, excuse me, 1772324 by older persons Salazar, Raimi and Prella expressing the sense of the council that a portion of the 800 block of St. Clair Avenue be closed to vehicle or traffic for the purpose of establishing a permanent public space in the location of the Uptown Parklit and directing the city administrator to establish a plan and take necessary steps towards the purpose and to report as appropriate on his progress in doing so. Holder Salazar. I have to suspend the rules. Any objection? No objection. There's been an objection. Okay, we'll go into a voice vote. All those in favor of suspending the rules, state aye. Aye. Any objections? Aye. We'll call the roll. Yes. So we're voting on suspending the rules to take up this item. Alder Decker. Aye. Alder Feldy. Alder Feldy. Okay, thank you. Alder Flicky Panesky. Thanks. Alder Heidemann. Thanks. Alder Mitchell. Thanks. Alder Pirella. Aye. Alder Raimi. Aye. Alder Rust. Aye. Alder Salazar. Aye. There can't be a tie tonight. Six ayes, three noes. Thank you. So the rules have been suspended. Alder Salazar, please proceed with your motion. I move to adopt the resolution. Is there a second? Second. Moved and seconded. Any discussion on this item? Alder Rust. So is this to create a similar type of park that is by Paradigm and 8th Street Alehouse? Is that the idea? City administrator. Sorry. I'm Iran. Yeah, there we go. All right, yeah. So we've met with the stakeholders in that area. They've kind of spent some of their own money and time coming up with a plan to make this permanent. We've had a couple different meetings with city staff, with some council members as well as the mayor. And the request was for us to move forward with this plan. And it's not in our capital plan, it's not in our budget. So I don't want to go dedicate staff time to it if it's not something council wants to move forward with. So this is essentially, if the council would like me to allocate staffing time and resources to get a plan put together, then we can do that. But right now it's just kind of a seasonal thing that we do. And if council wants to move forward with that, that's what this is for. So you said this is seasonal, would this be just for the summer months and spring through fall basically? No, the plan that they're requesting and kind of what's been discussed is to make it a year round. And what, as we've kind of talked about trying to activate more year round things for to keep interactions, to keep folks coming downtown even in the winter months, this would be something that we would look at being a permanent fixture and a permanent closure if that's so desired. So at this point, this is just come back with a plan and then we'll vet it through the public process at that point. Thank you. All their sales are. I was just going to answer all the rest questions, but yeah, it's the exact location and we're looking at more of a year round, permanent sort of facility that is, or outdoor setup that is programmed through the stakeholders in that specific area. Any other discussion on this item? Alder Mitchell. I guess I don't know if it's too late to ask for some further clarification on the reason for suspending, but this body recently chose not to suspend and send something back to committee on the basis that having a conversation is generally the expectation before we take a final vote on an item and I know there are items that are going to have exceptional circumstances if the city is served with something legal, that clock has already started to respond. Why didn't this one go through committee? Anyone want to take, Alder Decker, do you want to take that one? I guess I would, the reason we, because this is basically a full council thing more than just a committee thing, this is just more to get a sense of the council, so it's the entire council rather than sending it to a committee, so expressing this into the council. Alder Salzer again. Sorry, I agree with Alder Decker, but also it is going to, this plan that will be implemented at the parklet will still also go through public works. So I want to just be pretty upfront with my council here. I did go through the appropriate channels to sort of get this to handle the way that it normally would, and now it's come to a suspension of rules so that we could all talk about it. There is no sort of, the resolution here is for him sort of the city administrator and the team to work together as a unit to create the plan and start to do the work on making this more of a permanent area, and then that would then be referred to public works as come back to council. So I think you're just voting on the direction of moving it forward. Any follow up, Alder Mitchell? I'll leave it at that. Thank you, okay. Alder Raimi. And I just want to remind the council, especially the Department of Public Works committee that really, I think the number one, don't quote me on that, but was really high when we did the study on what is needed in our community is things to do during the winter months. And this is something, yes, we don't necessarily know what's going to happen, but making that plan to activate that space year round is something that our community does need. Thank you. Thank you. Other discussion on this item? Alder Mitchell. All right, I take it back one more. The final be it for the resolve states that it is the sense of the common council that it would be appropriate for future councils to make reasonable budget appropriations in support of such a project. Do we have any sort of ballpark as to what would be considered reasonable as stated in the resolution for this type of project? The administrator. The stakeholders have a plan that they've worked up. So we're kind of at a point where does the city get involved? That's why we're having this discussion now. And so if the city is going to get involved, then we'll come up with our plan with our cost figures. I know they've had a number of different ideas over the years of how they were going to do it. So now we'll formally do that and we'll come back with a cost proposal and what that might be. We don't know at this point. Thank you. Alder Selzer. I just want to follow up. They'll come up with a plan with the stakeholders that are there. And so the city will work with some of those who are involved already in those meetings to sort of figure out what financially makes the most sense. And then that'll come to finance and you can also then provide feedback there as well. Okay. Seeing no more cues. This would be a roll call vote. And that's accepted and filed. Item 39. RC number 209, 2324 by the Finance and Personnel Committee. To whom was referred? Director for Rural Resolution number 169, 2324 by Alder Persons Mitchell and Flickipinesky, authorizing entering into an independent contract agreement between the city of Sheboygan and Kapoor and Associates for Interim Department of Public Works Assistance including oversight and operations of cities, Director of Public Works and City Engineer Positions. Alder Mitchell. Move to receive the RC and adopt the resolution. Moved and seconded. Any discussion on this item? Alder Rust. Do we have an idea for a timeline as far as getting those positions permanently filled? City Administrator, yes. So we're coming forward with a plan. So this essentially lays the groundwork for moving forward now. So we knew we wouldn't have enough time to go out and try to get them filled right away. So our hope is that we can go out and advertise for two to three weeks, hopefully get it filled, probably have about a 30 to 40 day window to get the DPW Director position filled. And once that's filled, they can start on boarding and start the process of hiring the engineer position. So the idea I think we did through the end of the year in the contract, but with 30 days notice to terminate. So that was kind of the plan. Their Kapoor has been really flexible with us. So we'll use them as needed. And if we don't need them, then we won't utilize their services. So it's very flexible the way they were willing to do the contract with us. Thank you. Alder Heidemann. Thank you, Mayor. The scope of what Kapoor and Associates are gonna have to do is basically they're gonna just take over the operation of the Department of Public Works. Other than that, there's total responsibility to make sure that they're a functioning unit and that we continue to give the services to our community the way they have been in the past. As far as the engineering is concerned, that's just something that they're looking at. Some of the projects that are coming up and they're looking at those, but they're not actually involved in any one of those projects. They don't have money in there or anything. These people are just basically working for us for a time period and handing those responsibilities that were Dave Bebles and Ryan Sazmas. Yes, so yes, they're not currently under contract in any of these projects by the city or by the consultants. So their contract is with the city and then if they do enter into any contracts with any of the projects or with the city, they would contact us and we would do that. So if it's with the city, what we've agreed to is any projects that they would normally have bid on, they would ask us if they could bid and if we say no, then they won't bid. Some of the projects that normally we would have done in-house, we just necessarily don't have the capacity to do in-house, so we may ask them to do those projects, but that would fall under this contract. So, and we did have a discussion, there is one project that's pretty time sensitive, so we asked that they would just give us a proposal on that one to get that done and that was in consultation with Director Bebel and with former engineer Sazma. But yes, their role is the administration function, not necessarily the day-to-day operations. We have a very good team of supervisors and department directors in DPW, so we've met with them, we've kind of talked through this plan. Their main role is to act as technical liaison. Anything to do with final decision-making will run through me and then ultimately through the committee and through council and anything to do with human resources, if there's any employee issues, then those will run through our HR department and then ultimately back through me as well. So, as I stated in my memo, the main purpose of this is so that the additional work and the work that was done by Director Bebel and engineer Sazma doesn't overburden our staff who are fully booked out for all of next year already anyways. Thank you. Anyone else on this item? Okay, seeing no more queues, this will be a roll call vote. Sorry, nine eyes. All right, item 40, RC number 2122324 by the Public Works Committee to whom was referred resolution number 1672324 by older persons, Decker and Rust authorizing entering into an interim sanitary sewer services agreement with all signatories to the 1975 joint sewer treatment agreement for the Sheboygan region in order to authorize sanitary sewer services approximately 77 acres of land within the menace boundaries of the town of Mosul which is more commonly known as the cooler generator plant. Holder Decker. Thank you, Mayor. Let's hopefully I can get through this, right? I move to receive the RC and adopt the resolution with amendment to the agreement to remove the clause as conditionally. So there's been a motion to approve. There's been a second and now he's making a motion to amend. Okay, okay. No, the motion was as amended. It just didn't include the amendment in the minute. So that's why he's reading. Okay, then proceed, older Decker. Thank you. Okay, to remove the clause as conditionally approved by the Sheboygan urbanized area sewer service area technically, technical advisory committee pursuant to the 2030 Sheboygan urbanized area sewer service plan on blank as conditionally approved by the Wisconsin department of natural resources by a letter dated blank and from the second where is clause and from paragraph two as attached. Is there a second? Second. Moved and seconded. Any discussion on the item? Okay. Okay. Older cells are. Are you actually saying the word blank or was that supposed to be filled in? It's, I can, it's an attorney. It is. So in essence, what he's doing is repairing the minutes were somewhat defective coming out of public works. So they actually made this motion at public works. It was a proposal to take a little bit of language out of the agreement. They passed it, but because the minutes didn't include the language and your agenda didn't include the language, he's just reading it. But he actually is saying the word blank. There was a blank in there. We're removing that out of there. You're taking the word blank out. Yeah. That whole clause is being removed. Twice. Got it. Out of two different places. Okay. Thank you. Older flaky panesky. Thank you. So in plain English, we are granting sewage services to the town Mosul. Is that accurate? No, what is happening is we are agreeing to amend the sewer agreement that we have with a large number of communities to add the town of Mosul, but only for the purposes of the Kohler Generator plant so that the entire town is not getting added to the agreement, but we're agreeing to have a single extension of the regional sewer system to the town of Mosul to service the Kohler Generator plant. And we have the capacity to do that. I'll let Mr. Bebel answer that rather than me, even though I know the answer. Director Bebel. Yes, yes, we do at this time. And there's also provisions in with the future expansion in terms of not just this, but other areas of the collection system and its future impact. There's other review processes that would be invoked, but in terms of just this and serving the plant, this is satisfactory, this is fine. This is very similar to, I don't know if you recall, many years ago we did a very similar extension just to the airport and it only serves the airport. So they're very specific in nature. This request, so as city attorney Adams mentioned, it only serves this property in the town of Mosul. Okay, thank you. Other questions on this? I know we all love talking about sewer agreements. Director, excuse me, older person, Prella. Thank you, I like the director part. Just wondering about the, are we going to be compensated for this or it's not, so it's something that we provide anyway. Director Bebel. There's no expense to the city. This would be managed through the Kohler company as well as the Sanitary Sewer District that would serve. So in that sense, what we, and then any of the sewage and any of the flow, it gets metered and then it gets charged back to them for the treatment of the sewage as well. Any follow-up, Alder, Prella? No, thank you. Thank you. Anyone else? All right, seeing no more queues, this is a roll call vote. Nine eyes. That's approved. Item 41, general ordinance number 20, excuse me, 42, 23, 24 by elder persons, Russ and Felde, excuse me, item 41 is being referred to a committee. Item 42, I'm jumping the gun here. Item 42, matters lay over our own number 113, 23, 24 by the city plan commission to whom was referred to general ordinance number 39, 23, 24 by older persons, Decker, Salazar and Mitchell amending the city's planned unit development process as to streamline it and make it more user friendly, elder Decker. Thank you, Mayor. I move to receive the arrow and adopt the ordinance. Any discussion on this item? Alder, Flicky Pineski? Thank you. I had a question earlier about why we are amending the zoning ordinances when currently we don't have a staff person who is in charge of zoning ordinances. So can somebody talk to me about that? City Administrator? So this process is actually something that we've had and we do use and we've had a couple of projects recently that have went through. One of the issues that we keep running into is this particular process while it provides the most flexibility for both the city and the developer. There are four steps that are required under state statute to take this through the process. The last two steps requiring public hearings on both every time they come forward. Under our current process, we're required to give notice and then it goes to plan commission. So this process takes three, four months to get through that entire process and what we're trying to do is streamline that while increasing the protections that we have as a community in development projects and more site specific zoning rather than just having generalized zoning that we can't really control what goes onto a property. So that's our reason for doing that as far as the question of not having a zoning administrator in that position. We still have our director of planning and zoning that ultimately is responsible for all of this and that is her responsibility. And then we also have staff that they're the ones that meet with the applicants and walk them through the process. So we do have staff that are administering this and negotiating with developers as projects come through. So we don't have the zoning administrator position filled that we have between the director and staff. We have people working with this at now. Okay, thank you. Any additional comments on this item? All right, seeing no more cues. This will be a roll call vote. Nine eyes. That's approved. All right, item 43 RO number 111, 2324 by the city plan commission to whom was referred general ordinance number 37, 2324 by elder person Raimi and RO number 105, 2324 by the city clerk submitting application to amend to the city of Sheboygan's official zoning map of the Sheboygan zoning ordinance to change the use district classification for the property located at 3512 Wilgus Avenue, parcel number 592812158833 from class suburban, commercial to class suburban with a PUD overlay classification. Holder Raimi. Thank you, mayor. I move to file the RO and adopt the ordinance. Second. Moved and seconded. Any additional comments on this? Seeing none, this is a roll call vote. Nine eyes. That's approved. Item 44 RO number 112, 2324 by city plan commission to whom was referred general ordinance number 38, 2324 by elder person Raimi and pursuant to RO number 105, 2324 by the city clerk submitting an application to amend the city of Sheboygan's official zoning map of the Sheboygan zoning ordinance to change the use district classification for the property located at 3512 Wilgus Avenue, parcel number 59281215827 from class suburban, the class suburban commercial with a PUD overlay classification. Holder Raimi. Thank you again. I move to file the RO and adopt the ordinance. Second. Moved and seconded. Any discussion on this one? Seeing none, this is a roll call vote. Nine eyes. Thank you. We've exhausted the agenda. Holder Salazar. What is your pleasure to make a motion? Oh, I'm looking for a motion to adjourn. Second. Moved and seconded. All those in favor of adjourning, state aye. Aye. We're adjourned at 651. Thanks guys.