 Welcome to DDRC members, staff and guest. We ask for your patience during this meeting. Multiple staff members are present to make sure that the meeting runs smoothly and all applicants and citizens are able to communicate with the commission at the appropriate time. The public will be able to participate using multiple methods. When participating, please provide your name for documentation purposes. So the public may watch, email, phone or log into a web session. If you're watching, you may stream the meetings at City TV, accessed at www.youtube.com, backslash user, backslash Columbia SC government. You may submit letters and statements via email to COC board meeting at columbiasc.gov, leading up to and or during the meeting as this account will be monitored throughout the proceedings. Emails and letters will be read into the record. If you're phoning in, you can call 855-925-2801. And when prompted, please enter the meeting code 1859. If you're participating by phone, you'll have three options. Star 1 will allow you to listen, Star 2 will allow you to record a voicemail message that will be read into the record and Star 3 will allow a participant to be placed in a queue so that you may speak live when prompted. If you're calling in, please make sure your computer audio is muted, it's muted via, sorry. Please make sure your computer audio is muted if calling in live via your phone so we don't get feedback. You can stream the proceedings at publicinput.com backslash COC, ddrc-jun, jun2022. And I will call the roll and we have a few new members. I'd like to introduce Bruce Greenberg and Phillip McGuire. We're very, very happy to have them here today. So thank you for being willing to serve and joining us. So Miss Brannum. Here. Mr. Dinkins. Here. Mr. Greenberg. Miss Jacob. Here. Mr. McGuire. And we have Quorum. In order to avoid ex parte communications, DDRC members are under strict instructions not to discuss cases under consideration with the public or with each other outside of the public forum. The meeting typically starts with staff calling the case, giving a summary of the project and then calling on the applicant to present if they wish. Decisions are typically made in one evening. Decisions may be appealed within 30 days to a court of competent jurisdiction. Oaves will be administered individually as we hear either from applicants or from live speakers. Applicants with requests before the DDRC are allotted a presentation time of 10 minutes. This time should include but is not limited to an overview of the project, case history, and any pertinent meetings held regarding the request. This time also includes all persons presenting information on behalf of the applicant such as attorneys, engineers, and architects. This time does not include any questions asked by the DDRC or staff regarding request. Members of the general public are given the opportunity to address their concerns in intervals of two minutes. Applicants may have five minutes to respond. Staff has a timer and will make presenters aware of when their time has expired. Are there any changes to the agenda? We do have two changes to the agenda. Under the consent agenda item number four, 2201 Lincoln Street, a request for design approval for exterior changes and preliminary certification of the Bailey Bill in the Elmwood Park architectural conservation district has been deferred. And under the regular agenda, case number one, our only case on the regular agenda, 2805 Lincoln Street, which is a request for design approval for an accessory building in Earlwood Protection Area A has been moved to consent since the property owner has agreed to staff recommendations. Those are all of the changes. The DDRC uses the consent agenda to approve non-controversial or routine matters by single motion and vote. If a member of the DDRC or the general public wants to discuss an item on the consent agenda, that item is removed from the consent agenda and considered during the meeting. The DDRC then approves the remaining consent agenda items. Will staff please read the consent agenda? Certainly. Our first item is 1907 Pendleton Street, a request for preliminary certification of the Bailey Bill in the University Hill Architectural Conservation District. 1917 College Street, request for preliminary certification of the Bailey Bill again in the University Hill Architectural Conservation District. 2229 Park Street, request for preliminary certification of the Bailey Bill in the Elmwood Park Architectural Conservation District. 1240 Heights Street, request for a preliminary certification of the Bailey bill in the Waverly protection area. 121 through 123 Williams Street request for a preliminary certification of the Bailey bill in the Granby architectural conservation district. 1808 Cattaba Street request for design approval for new construction of an accessory structure in the Wales Garden architectural conservation district 720 Olive Street request for preliminary certification of the Bailey bill in the Oakwood court architectural conservation district and 729 Olive Street request for a certificate of design approval for new construction of an accessory structure in the Oakwood court architectural conservation district and last is 2805 Lincoln Street a request for a certificate of design approval for an accessory building in Earlwood protection area A. Is there anyone from the DDRC that would like any item removed from the consent agenda? No, I do have a question though. I'm about the 28th of Lincoln. Does that mean the the new accessory structure was less than 240 square feet? It was coming here because it was larger than that. They've cut it back. No, they didn't. The size was okay. It just has to be heard by the DDRC if it's over a certain square footage, but staff had made some recommendations in terms of garage door style and window fenestration where they can be seen from the public right of way and the property owner was good with those recommendations. So that's why it moved to the consent agenda. And I assume you have that all in writing and you're okay. Yes, indeed. Anyone else? Good. All right. Is there anyone from the public that would like to have an item removed from the consent agenda? I don't see any emails coming through emails. Any phone calls? Please communicate by sending an email to COC board meeting at columbiasc.gov or please communicate via phone by pressing star two to leave a voicemail or star three to speak in person. Pause to see if we've received any communication. So do I have a motion and a second to accept the consent agenda and also the May minutes? Oh, I'll be happy to do it. Boom. I moved to accept the May 19th EDRC minutes, including all staff recommendations and the consent agenda items, including 2805 Lincoln Street with all staff recommendations. Second. Miss Branham. Yes. Mr. Dinkins. Yes. Mr. Greenberg. Yes. Miss Jaco. Yes. And Mr. McGuire. Motion passes. Is there any items under other business? The only item we have under other businesses, we were going to try to do some internal training for the board as a whole next month, just for maybe 45 minutes before the next meeting. If that's doable. We thought it would be a good opportunity to talk about some projects that have come through DDRC. So we're talking about maybe meeting here at three or something on the day of the meeting. Okay. Right. How's that format? How's that format going to be? Like a training session or more of a, okay. Oh, just a training session. Right. So. Great idea. We'll talk at you. Oh, great. We need that. That's good. All right. Any other business? No. I don't have any items at this moment. So I think we're good. Look for a motion, a second to adjourn the meeting. Motion to adjourn. Thank you. Good job guys. It's all right. I mean, you know, really good.