 Orangnya udah kena ikut, orangnya udah kena ikut, jalan-jalan. Test, test, satu, dua, taruh mana itu? Test, test, test. Test, test, satu, taruh mana itu? Test, test, satu, taruh mana? As you know, I have been at the G20 today. And before I turn to the, one of the bilaterals, we are the EU representative and many others. So I am grateful for the privilege and honour of representing Australia at this forum. This government will continue to be forward-leaning in our activism internationally. We recognise as a middle power and at a time where there are great challenges in this world. Australia's security and national interests lies in our engagement with our region and with the world in multilateral forum and in our support for a system that reflects international law and international norms as a basis for which disputes can be settled. As you are also aware, tonight I met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi. I welcome our discussion on issues of concern between our two countries, as well as our discussion on the prosperity, security and stability of the region. We spoke frankly and we listened carefully to each other's priorities and concerns. As you would expect, I raised a number of issues in relation to bilateral, regional and consular issues. Australia and China have gained much of the strength of our economic and people-to-people ties. We do have our differences. We do have our differences. But as I said this morning and as I previously said we believe it is in the interests of both countries for the relationship to be stabilised. And this Australian government will always seek to resolve issues calmly and consistently under the comprehensive strategic partnership and in accordance with Australia's national interests. I'm happy to take questions. Mr, earlier today you appeared to be trying to temper expectations of what might be achieved at this meeting. Has it exceeded your expectations? What can you tell us about where we're at now? Look, what I can say to you is that this is the first of the first step towards stabilising the relationship. So we are a government and we're a nation that's made certain decisions and on the basis of our national interests, our national security and our sovereignty and we won't be resiling from those. But we do think it's in our interests and we would say in China's interest for the relation to be stabilised. That's going to take time. It's going to take effort. It's going to take work. And it's going to take some nuance. Did you hear you made some progress today? It was an important first step. You talked about steps? I think we both agreed it was an important next step as I don't intend to give a blow-by-blow account of the region for obvious reasons. But I think it is a fair summation to say we both recognise it is a first step for both our nations. We've got a path to walk and we'll see if it can lead to a better place between the two countries. Can you at least say what some of those concerns were on both sides that were raised? It is unsurprising that we would raise consular cases including Ms Cheng Le and Dr Yang and others. You would anticipate that obviously we discussed the trade blockages that exist and that remains the government's position. Those trade blockages should be removed and we have said so publicly and our private position reflects that. And did China ask for anything sort of concrete in return? I think the Chinese position is well known and the issues of difference and different perspectives is well known and obviously what was put to me reflected what we know China's position to be. Did you find any common ground on trade and did they give you any reason to hope that there might be an imminent release of our entertaining? I think all of these issues are in some time and I think there is a path we are walking and we will take one step at a time in the interest of the country. Does that path include further meetings anytime soon? Well, I think it would be an interest to do so. Both are interest but that would require both countries to agree to do so. Could you convey that same message to the government through the pressure in the world? I'm not going to go through all the detail of what was and wasn't said but you can you can take it as read that our view about international law and the importance of the UN Charter which is the basis as you've heard many of my speeches in Ukraine is our public and our private position. What can you say about the sessions today as part of the G20 and the collective responsibility to the issue of the war in Ukraine? Look, I thought there were some really powerful contributions on the effect of the war in Ukraine. The consequence of it I was moved by some of the contributions. I think the German Foreign Minister and the Canadian Foreign Minister in particular may profoundly move in contributions and in the second session the Foreign Minister Ukraine who spoke to us about the number of children who have been lost in this war brought a poignant fact to the attention of the G20 that there was obviously Russia has a different position and Russia's position is untenable it is untenable. Mr Lavrov said today that Australia should do its homework in terms of the background to the war in Ukraine. I don't take I don't think any Australian takes lectures from Mr Lavrov about the war in Ukraine. I think we all know that is the consequence of Russia's aggression Russia's abrogation of international law it is really important and this is a point I made that we do not normalize or minimize what is occurring in Ukraine. Thank you very much for your time.