 Rydyn ni'n ddiweddor i mor cyfnod o'r nextal sydd, yn sefyllfaeth cyfnod y 1143, yn yr iddo George Adam, ac yn ysgrifwng y Gymraes Bwyll Burial, sefydlu cael ei pethau arweiny o'r cyfradau i ysgrifwng. Rydyn ni wedyn ni'n cymorth i gynnig o fynd i gynnig i'r swyddemu, piech everywhere moeten gynnig i'r ffôllion ar y cyfradd ddechrau. Rydyn ni wedyn ni'n cymorth i gynnig i'r swyddemu. Mae'r ffordd yn dweud. Dwi'n dweud o'r ddeningau. Mae'n dweud i'r ddeningau, ddisgwm nhw, ac yn ni'n ddulliannol'i ddweud. Daid li'n ddweud i'r ddweud. Fy loedd y dyfodol i'n dweud i'r ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddulliannol 1111, o'r cyfrif elderlyer i'r gyflym Arrys Si'r Senffordydd, ond mae'n fryd o ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddweud. The question is that motion 1111 be agreed. Are we all agreed? The motion is therefore agreed. The next item of business is consideration of business motion 1112, in the name of George Adam on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau on stage 1 timetable for a bill. Any member who wishes to speak against the motion should press their request to speak button now. I call on George Adam to move the motion. Felly, nôroooooch i complexes y bodydd gwas Talking, nôrhoo, ond nôrh Image on misery nad i. variants sy'n ymrth yng Nghymru nad iddyn nhw'n y gall, ond mae am excwyddoniewn iawn i maent a treatedpl o feddwl swydd healing hogwyr gyda fel ddagel Chili Aelonod on nôrn uniqueid. Fy fydd yma g magnitude iddyn nhw, o adwau c overcoming draw Stark, dwi dwi ddaw hi i mylliant i gyendag涂 aelonawd~! of SSIs, 1-1-2-1 on committee membership and 1-1-2-2 on committee substitutions. I'm quite happy to go into detail on the SSIs, if you wish. Minister, if you would wish to— No, I would prefer to wish to, but I was just giving you the option. I think that, given that you have offered the chamber that option, you should continue. Let's hear you. Once again, everyone's favourite time of the evening. The First SSI's health protection coronavirus international travel Scotland amendment, number 13, regulations 2021, SSI 2021-237, came into force on 14 June and has extended to definitions for elite sport to include all events at which specified persons complete to qualify for the Birmingham Commonwealth Games. The next one is the health protection coronavirus restrictions and requirements local level Scotland amendment, number 27, regulations 2021, SSI 2021-238, came into force on 11 June. It included providing a person designated by a local authority with a power of entry to enforce restrictions relating to stadia and events. The next one is the health protection coronavirus restrictions and requirements local level Scotland amendment, number 28, regulations 2021, SSI 2021-242, came into force on 18 June, included removing Ireland in Bedford borough council from the list of areas to which common travel area restrictions apply. Following that is the health protection coronavirus restrictions and requirements local level Scotland amendment, number 29. Regulations 2021, SSI 2021-252, came into force on 26 June, included adjusting physical distance requirements in various settings, including funerals. The health protection coronavirus restrictions and requirements local level Scotland amendment, number 30, regulations 2021, SSI 2021-255, came into force on 30 June, included removing the areas of Bolton metropolin borough council from the list of areas of which common travel area restrictions apply. The health protection coronavirus restrictions and requirements local level Scotland amendment, number 31, regulations 2021, SSI 2021-262, came into force on 8 July, included reducing required physical distances to maintain between persons within the premises of the Renaissance club North Berwick for a period of the Scottish Open in July. The health protection coronavirus restrictions and requirements local level Scotland amendment, number 32, regulations 2021, SSI 2021-263, came into force on 19 July, and included reduced physical distance to one metre indoors and outdoors. Finally, the health protection coronavirus requirement Scotland regulation 2021, SSI 2021-277, came into force on 9 August, included requirement for relevant hospitality and entertainment premises to obtain a record visitor information, and that is that. The question on those motions will be put at decision time. There are three questions to be put as a result. The First Minister accused a number of members of this chamber of using data on test and protect in a misleading manner. She accused members of talking down the performance of test and protect and proceeded to share her wisdom with the chamber on the accuracy of provisional figures. The First Minister then, using provisional figures, appeared to suggest performance was within the WHO standards. It is a case of do as I say not as I do. It gives a misleading impression of test and protect performance by the test that the First Minister herself set for others. The First Minister was given the opportunity to clarify her remarks by my colleague Paula Cain. She did not. She encouraged members to look in detail at the figures that I have. Data published only this afternoon by Public Health Scotland makes clear that only 60.5% of contact tracing was completed within the target 72 hours well below the WHO standard. Those are finalised figures, Presiding Officer. The First Minister herself stressed the importance of accuracy. I know that you want colleagues to treat each other with respect. That applies to the First Minister too, out of respect for colleagues. Should the First Minister apologise to the chamber for suggesting that figures were being used in a misleading way by members of the chamber? Will the First Minister be asked to clarify the record at the earliest opportunity? I thank the member for advance notice of his point of order. The content of members' contributions is not a matter for me, however the member's point is now on the record. If any member realises that he or she has given incorrect information in a contribution in the chamber, there is a procedure for addressing that via the official report. There are three questions to be put as a result of today's business. I propose to ask a single question on seven parliamentary bureau motions, and if any member objects, please say so now. Can I ask to which motion the member objects? Motion 1120. In that case, I will put the others on block and take that question separately. The first question is that motions 1113, 1114, 1115 and 1117 to 1119, in the name of George Adam, on behalf of the parliamentary bureau on approval if SSIs be agreed, are we all agreed? The motion is therefore agreed. The next question is that motion 1120, in the name of George Adam, on behalf of the parliamentary bureau on approval of SSIs be agreed, are we all agreed? The Parliament is not agreed, therefore we will move to a vote and there will be a short suspension. The question is that motion 1120, in the name of George Adam, on behalf of the parliamentary bureau on approval of an SSIs be agreed, members may cast their votes now. The vote is now closed. The result of the vote on motion 1120, in the name of George Adam, is yes, 67, no 25, there were 24 abstentions, the motion is therefore agreed. The next question is that motion 1121, in the name of George Adam, on behalf of the parliamentary bureau on committee membership be agreed, are we all agreed? The final question is that motion 1122, in the name of George Adam, on behalf of the parliamentary bureau on substitution on committees be agreed, are we all agreed? The motion is therefore agreed and that concludes decision time and will now move to members' business and I would be grateful if members leaving the chamber could do so quietly.