 My name's Tom Tanner. I'm a research fellow at the Overseas Development Institute, ODI, where I head up the adaptation and resilience work. I've just come out of a session that we organised called Have You Got the Wow Factor, which was the idea of taking the X Factor format to monitoring and evaluation problems for community-based adaptation and allowing the presenters to be contestants in a game show where they were given six minutes to deliver their song or their message about why their approach was innovative, so why was it exciting? Why was it effective? Why should you be doing it? So to try and persuade people that their approach was the one that had the greatest wow factor, and we gave them six minutes just to use a combination of powerpoint and comedy to deliver their messages, and I think it worked really well in live-ing up the audience, who then had a chance to vote on who was the winner. We asked people to move to different corners of the room, according to who they wanted to vote for, having sent the contestants out of the room, and then the person with the least votes was reassigned to others until we eventually ended up with one winner who won a trophy. It just livened up the session slightly towards the end of the conference when after lunch people are flagging slightly, and it got the messages through really clearly because the participants had to focus like contestants. They had their six minutes of fame and they had to focus their message in a much sharper way I think than they would have in a normal presentation. There's a lot of questions around the sustainability of approaches. There's this persistent problem that the new and innovative and exciting examples of monitoring evaluation that are set up, whether it be how we target particular people, how we track the resilience of people, the effectiveness of adaptation on the ground, but these things often die away. The main question I think was like, how is your approach going to sustain? How is it going to be taken forward by those at community level and the communities themselves rather than being something that's driven much more technologically from the top? Key lesson learning, certainly make it lively, liven up the session, make it exciting, wear ridiculous bow ties. Anything really just to break up the potential of people flagging and not really listening. And I think having the kind of game show format with a prize actually made the people, the presenters, really sharpen their presentations. I saw them this morning, one of them passed one of the other presenters and he gave him a real cold shoulder with a real kind of like morning and they're all really getting really competitive and I saw them all working really hard at their presentations in ways that maybe they wouldn't have if they'd just been on a normal panel.