 Ydw i ddweud â byddwn yn hynny o glifennu gweithio, yn ond mor hwn yn gwahanol o gael ddataeth i'r ymlaen i fynd i siaradau. Mae'n ddechrau bod yn gwahanol i'r bydd fferm hwn i'i gael ddataeth i fynd i fynd i'n gwahanol i fynd i gyntafedd'r ystod o gael ddaeth gwahanol ar lleio ac mae'n gwaith i'n gael ddaeth ymlaen i fynd i fynd i'r gael o gael ddaeth awr편au ar weithloed. Inywg y romance ameddaeth argy другой litigation cl людей. Yn falch mewn pawan y tro checko llarwyr gwneud ohell cysylltau i fi fathę fath unig i greadon ar gyfrannu lle gall llyfiadau a chymifiad yr hyn sydd gennym y pamrleme di Alebuys i gymwy uncertainiaeth. F weakestwyr tu Dim yw hir a'i divide post gwybrae y Monster기ol. while reducing different forms of research in various different countries. Then, in 2014, we came together and the International Survey, which has since been published. Unless we followed up in 2018, repeating many of the same questions, but also streamlining and adapting the survey to bring it more up to date, crucially, we're able to make a number of comparisons between 2014 and 2018. Ac that's what I'd like to present today. This has unpublished works so far and so we're still working on much of the interpretation of it and I'll be very interested in your comments. What we focused on in this research then was trying to work out where libraries were in terms of the development of policy and the development of services. We looked in particular at the development of partnerships and collaborations ac ychydigau chi'n gwerin wrth y rhwng yn arddangos i'w gwleidwyr gweithio wirthio yma. Rydym i ddim yn cydeithasio aronds y rhwng hynny o'r rhwng gyda rhywunau fannogforfa ar rhwng ac yw'r rhwng yn gallu gwirioneddau ar y rhwng, ac arddangos i gael geithio eu gwirioneddau hynny, ac yn gweithio'n gwirioneddau. Ty, implemented today is focus on the twenty eighteen date. But dwarf comparisons what we saw in 2014. And hopefully this will give us an insight into the maturity as it as it develops. So I'm going to present some of the data on the current situation. And then I'm going hand over to Andrew, who's going to look at skills an and also some of the interpretation of the data. Rwy'n bynnig i gael gwlad y gael eich gweld, ond am ysgrifennu'r slide ar gyfer, yn defnyddio'r gweithio i'r gweithio. Mae'r reilio'n 209 odd o'r gyffredinol yma, yn y gweithio'r cyffredinol bryd yn ymgyrchu. Rydym yn fwy o'r canogau, o'r Australia, ym Ymgyrchu, ym New Zealandau, a'r gweithio'r gweithio'r cyffredinol bryd yn y UK, a'r gweithio'n gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio'r. Mae'n judgment iawn o ein slogan arall flyny. Felly, Pikr wyddog iso, ac mae'n ll provision hefyd yn'n cyflugwyd — we need to bear that in mind, particularly when we doing country specific analysis. For you is to give you the heads-up on the main findings of the survey, first of all, we saw clearly that libraries are moving forward with regard to research data management. We see progress in more or less every area o'r prydau ymlaen, oherwydd, o'r cyfnodau cyfnodau a'r cyfnodau. Y perseftyd o'r cyfnodau, y dyfodol yn y pryd yn rhan o'r cyfnodau yn y rhan o'r cyfrifodau mewn yrhaith o'r cyfrifodau yw 2014 a 2018, oedd yn gwneud hynny'n gweithio. Ond dyna'r llyfr yn ymlaen i'r llyfr yn y llyfr o'r cyfrifodau o'r cyfrifodau ar gyfer y ddechrau'r cyfrifodau. Ond rydw i'r llyfr yn ymlaen i'r cyfrifodau yma o hynny, ac mae'n gweld i'r sgwdeithas oedd yng Nghymru oedd ymdraethau ar gyfer rhywleid. Mae'r ffordd o'r lluniau wedi'u gweld i'r sgwdeithas fel yw'r cyfle, ac mae'r gweithio ymddir iawn o'r gweithio, mae'r gweithio ffyrdd o'r lluniau yn ôl sydd ymddir iawn, a'r gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio i'r gweithio, ac mae'r wneud o'r gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio, something or very few sanctions if you don't comply. So the lack of resources, but also still a lack of staff engagement, a lack of academic staff engagement as seen as the most crucial barriers. So that's the headlines. Now let's go through some of the data. We asked in the previous survey and in this survey what the position was as far as policy development is concerned. What we see at least is in some countries, felly Oustralia a Leuciaen yna sydd yn cael eu cyfnod yn ei wneud yn ymgyrchol, ac rydyn ni'n ei ddweud y progres yma ar ddod y 2014 ac 28. Ond yw'r cyfnod yma, mae'r olygu yn cymdeithasol, ond yn Cynedr yn New Zealand, mae'n gweithio fydd yna bod y cyfnod o'r cyfnod o'r cyfrifysgwch yn cymdeithasol, nid o'r cyfeithio'r cyfeithio'r cyfrifysgwch. Nid yw'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'r cyfrifysgwch, Ac oes yn ei bwysig y bydd yma'r cyflawn yn ei ddechrau o'r gwrs ac mae'n cyhoeddol yn ffodol. Mae yma'n ogylchedd ar hyn o'r rhan o'r cyflawn yn y lladd. Mae'n cael ei ddigwyddio'n gweinol. Cymdraeth o'r 2014 a 2018 o'r ddweud o gweithio'r cyflawn. Mae glyfan yn all y bwysig, mae'n gweithio penderfynu, yn dweud pan yn merch sydd yn ei gweithiau. Tym ni'n gyfleoedd â'r gweithio'n cyflwytoedd yn gweithio sydd yn bwysig yn cael bynnag. Mae'n gweithio'n wahanol ar amlwg ydw i'w sgwrdd, oedd aeth y mae'n 26 oes, ond rwy'n rhywunon nhwlad yn ei gweithio. Mae'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gwybod yn rhan o ddechrau Bwysig Ardgnadau Iedwyr yn unrhyw ddatblygu. Ond byddai'r cyffredin pan wedi'r cyffredin, wrth gwrs, y cyfnodol hyd o siwyddd yn ddeigasio o'r senghoru yna, a llwyddoedd y pryd yn cael eu amser o'r senghoru i'r ddeigasio ar y sefyd. Y reporter o'r senghoru ar 5 o'r senghoru, y gallwn gwneud fy ysgawr yma, yma'r nadod ffordd oherwydd mae gyntaf 24 a 28. Y pryd yn éu gweld yn ei ddefnyddio i'r senghoru, ac olau hynny yn dech gyda fy mhaskydd cyfleoedd, mae'n dweud yn i-gwm, ac mae'n arwain gwnaeth y pryd yn eu ddevnogol, unhealthy but it's marginal, so that's quite interesting the libraries are still seeing the agenda as essentially same thing even though they are making progress in various areas. As far as collaborations are concerned an interesting position here, nearly half libraries are collaborating with external organisations in order to deliver their research data management activities but we see collaborations increasing in the UK But decreasing in Australia, and we think in Australia that's probably to do with a closure of hands. But it's interesting to try and think of explanations. Maybe more consortial activity, maybe just activity in this area which is maybe some outsourcing of services, which is prompting people to say that they are partnering with external organisations. Organisational structure is interesting, but one of the things that are interesting is Onw, mae llawer i gynhyrch, neu rhaid i'n dda'r wyrei, mae rhai unigrwyntiau yn ffwrdd mlwyd, a wneud i'r cerdwsau cymdeithasol ar y Llywodraeth Rhywodraethau diolch. A wneud i'n gweithio ffosibl yn ymdweithio'n gweithio i chi, gyda'r cyfriffeith gweithio cymdeithasol ymleidio'r rhaid i'r diversell yn fathau'r gweithio'r fathau'r gweithio'r gweithio. a ddylch ei ffordd yn ddwyd i'r dweudio ar gyfan y cyfnodd arredig rydyn ni i fel eu cyfnodd. Mae ydynt eu bod ydynt wedi bod yn bwysig yn adeiladol i ddim yn y cyfnodd y cyfnodd arfer ar y ddweudio ar y ddweudio ar ddod y cyfan. Maen nhw'n gwybod am fynd i gael cofwyrwch ar ei fod rhai cerdd. Mae'r rhai cyfnod ac mae'r cerdd fyrdd yn oedd y cyd-serfus ym mwyaf. Mae'r cerdd fyddig iawn yn dod yn ddefnyddio'i gyd-wch i ddechrau cyfosifol, ond mae'n gweinio ar dweud yma yn dyfyrdd ac mae'r cerdd yn oed yn ddefnyddio'i gwasanaeth. Maen nhw'n gweinio'r cyfosifol o'r cyd-serfus ym mwyaf am ddydd yma, more developed services. That came across relatively clearly. Although there are still a lot of variation in the data. As far as skills are concerned, we see skills gaps in pretty much every area we worked, we asked about, with significant areas, like for instance data curation skills, and these haven't changed all that much between 2014 2018. Mae'r cyfnodau ei wneud gynllun o'r eu lleol iawn i'r ddweud gafodol. Maen nhw, grefau'r ddweud rydw i, at oes gafodol ar y ddweud gafodol ar gyfer y gyrraffon lleol yn gwneud lleol iawn i gweithiau'r ddweud. Y cael drwy'r hyn yn llawer, mae'n ddiwedd ag gilydd frym wedi cael ei gallu ar y dylai'r gyfer yw'r llunau efoareddau'r hyn yn anhygoel cael eu gwaith, mae'n gweithio i gael yr adeg ymlaen, mae'r ddweud yma eich ysgrifennu lleol. A yna'r ddweud yn bobl. Felly mae'n gweithio. Rwy'n gweithio i'r gweithio, yna'r ddweud ymlaen o'r ysgrifennu lleol y Llyfrwr yn gweithio. Felly, sy'n gweithio i'r adeg yma, ymmygu'n bwysig. Everyone is trying to find a role for the future, they are adapting. They are transforming very intentionally and we thought that was quite an interesting insight provided by the data. The challenges though, as I said, focus on resources, skills and academic engagement. And that came across very clearly. Although I said at the beginning that the role of the library in delivering research data services is now becoming more widely accepted and embedded. There are still significant challenges in this area, and in many institutions it is still not a done deal, at least in terms of expanding that role. And so libraries we're very conscious are still arguing the case and still negotiating over that territory in relation to RDS. So that's a presentation of some of the data. I'm now going to hand over to Andrew, who's going to present some of our interpretation. OK, so this goes maybe slightly beyond the data in that. I've always thought that there's quite a complex agenda here of talking to researchers about the need to manage data effectively and the benefits to them personally. Then there's a more demanding thing that they might share data, even more demanding that they might make their data open. And the whole open science and open scholarship agenda, even pushing things further. So there's quite a complicated agenda there that is being pushed by various forces. I put funder compliance in much larger arrow than perhaps the data we've got suggests. But I think there's lots of forces going on pushing the agenda and again lots of barriers as well acting against the progression of this agenda. To go back to something more founded in the data, though, I think there could be said to be three paradoxes around RDM that remain true. One is that we know the researchers need to manage the data more effectively. But actually the demand for a research data service is still quite weak. So there's need but not demand. That's one of the paradoxes. The second paradox is that we know the main driver is compliance with what the funders say we should be doing. But actually is the much checking of compliance and is the much funding to support compliance. So there's still a paradox there too. And the third paradox is that libraries want to be involved. We've seen from the previous slides is all about what libraries say they're doing about research data management. They want to be involved and it's part of, partly justified from reinventing what the library is. But there's still a strong sense of a lack of skills, a lack of capability, a lack of credibility with academics and also a resource gap. So I think there's still remain, maybe those paradoxes have been around for quite a long time. But I think there's still remain. In the earlier work we did, we developed a kind of maturity model. I personally recoil quite a lot from that idea of saying there's a maturity model because it implies one size fits all. Everybody's on the same development path. And actually one of the big common understandings of the community when research data management was emerging as a gender seemed to be, it's not going to be the same for everybody. So I've always been a little bit against the idea of maturity model. But actually our data does kind of suggest that. So for example, if you compare the Russell group institutions data with that of the non Russell group institutions in the UK, and I know that's underestimating the difference potentially. The only real difference is that there's more saturation in the kind of very common research data services, not that more advanced services are being developed by the more research intensive institutions. So maybe a maturity model does work, and maybe it is quite a common across the sector for whatever reason. So this is our revised maturity model. So what it basically says is well at level zero we're just really thinking about research data management. We might be doing audits and surveys to work out what data have we got, what are researchers attitudes. Then level one we're labelling compliance at the moment. So it's about the obvious services you could easily supply like training in research data management advisory services. You've probably got a formal policy in place. And then maybe specific individuals are given the RDM role or there's dispersed responsibility across many teams. And it's more about translating on the right hand side, translating existing skills. So that's a kind of compliance level. I think we're more tending towards to get to this kind of stewardship level we've labelled it, where you've got a data repository, you've got some support of technical services, you've got a dedicated RDM team to some extent and you've gone to the extent of re-skilling existing staff. So that's maybe the stewardship level that many institutions in the UK are at. And then this transformation, so our paper is all about is RDM transformational for libraries. So this transformation level where you might be doing things like data analysis and data visualisation, doing more things around data integrity and reproducibility, where I think it's pushing libraries to have very different types of skills than they've had in the past and maybe things like embedded roles. That we do not see and maybe that's on our path that we're going to reach and maybe it's not something we really going to aspire to because kind of my analysis of our analysis of the determinants of what services have emerged seem to be driven by three things really. One is, are we doing something pretty similar already? Have we done it for years? How can we just translate existing skills to this new context? That seems to be often why we're delivering a particular service. Does it require not much resource? And there's a few cases and particularly data management planning where I feel that's beyond what libraries have typically done but there's immediate demand evidence. Being general, what seems to be driving the service that people are supplying is doing familiar things in a slightly different context, things that don't demand too much resources and a few real changes where there's a very strong sense of immediate demand. So I think our underlying question was always going to be, it was always has research data management transformed academic libraries in terms of our skillset? Have we really acquired a whole new skillset? Have we changed fundamentally organisationally? Has our notion of what a library is and a collection is? Has that really changed? And the answer seems to be in my opinion, maybe this is just my opinion, it's no, we haven't transformed. There is the potential alongside things like text and data mining, changes in other aspects of scholarship, scientific metrics, all the scholarly communications area, maybe there's a potential for transformation but I think RDM on its own hasn't really transformed academic libraries.