 Fe ydych yn ffordd ond wrth i'runkwladu Rydych yn rhoi treff awtodd fel flynydd ar hyn o fewn am Gwynedd Gyrain y Prifysgr Tob���f ym Milfaeth 25 Ar hyn. A oedodd yr acedigaf syniad yr gfind ateb bolyw bidw i panesio maedfa ar hyn Scer lengthy Now go and Maya all the names are here. The aim of the session is to take stock of the advances made in the study of the Centre of Mediterranean Prehistory in the last 25 years, capture the most innovative research being carried out these days and help share the agenda of this important field of studies for the next 25 years. Mae'n ymwneud i gafodd yn fwy o broddimistig. Mae'n fwy o'r 10 ysgrifennu, a byddwn yn fawr o'r ddysgu. Felly, y Cymru yn ymdw i'r gweithio ar hynny wedi'u gwybodaeth lluniau mae'r grwp hwnnw. Mae'r ddiwaith yn fawr o ffyrdd yn ymddiolol, sy'n gweithio'r mae'r bwysig, a'r gweithio ar gyfer bwysig, sy'n gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio, yw'r ddechrau sy'n gweithio ar y cyflogol. A dwi'n gwybod i'r ysgolwyd yma i'r ffordd y flwyddyn ymlaen o gweithio a ffostod y newid ysgolwydau a'r dweud, i gweithio'r flwyddyn yn fwy o'r ysgolwydau i'r regionau, oherwydd mae'n gweithio'n gweithio, a'r bydd ymlaen o'r cyfnodau a'r cyfnodau cyfnodau. Mae'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio, ac roeddwn i'n gweithio'n gweithio'r cyfnodau i'r 50 munud. Byddwch i ymweld, byddai i'r gweithio'r pethau, teimladau'n gweithio llwyddiadau, ac yn ymweld, yn fawr, mae'n dda i'r gweithio, mae'n ddweud o'r ddechrau, ac mae'n ddweud o'r ddweud o'r gweithio. Felly, rydyn ni'n oedd y poster, ac mae ydw i'n ddweud o'r gweithio'r poster. wrth credu'r ffordd, ac mae'n gweithio i'ch gweithio'r poster, ac mae'n ffrwy yng Nghymru'n ddiddordef ar y rymd, ond ymlaen â'r ddweud, ac yn fwy o'r ddweud. Rwy'n credu'n gofio'n meddwl y ddweud o'r seishon yw'n oed yn cael eu ddechrau, ond mae'n gweithio'r llaw o'r holl o'r yn cael eu ddweud, ond mae'n gweithio'n oed yn cael eu ddweud. Mae'n ddych chi'n ei ddifêr o'i wneud, ac mae'n ddegwch i'r gweithio yma, a'r ddweud hynny, wedi'i'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio, y ddweud hynny, y ddweud hynny. Efallai'n ddweud hynny'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio. Mae 3 cyfnod hynny. Ac yndog, yw hi'n gweld cyfnod hynny. Cymru cyfnod yn hollb bod yn cofnol yn ddigonol. Mae'r cerddau cyfnod hynny, ei cofeiydd fod ein naum yng Nghaerffordd. Mae'r cyfnod yn cyfnod. Mae'r cynnodech chi. Mae'r cynnodech chi'n cynnodech chi'n cefnod. Mae'r cerddau yma yn yng nghyddiadau'r f Guardian. Mae'r cerddau mewn gyfnod yma yn ei gynnig y dyfanydd oedd. The loose organization of presentations, and the main thing is to foster a debate across those disciplinary areas and period panels. So it's not certain in chronological order or any geographical order either. Felly, yn ffawr i ddisodd mewn ysgolwydd i'w byswyd ni'n gweithio'r seffon o'r ffordd, ydych chi'n meddwl i'r ffordd o'r hanes o'r gael ar gyfer llwyddiadau ar gyfer llwyddiadau, oherwydd yma yma yma yw 25 yr ysgol. Mae'n mynd i chael'r Ysgolwyd Bolwydd EAA yw eu cyhoeddiadau yn y Ysgolwyd 1990 a'u wneud o'r wneud i'w ddweud i fryd o'r llwyddiadau ar gyfer llwyddiadau ar gyfer llwyddiadau. Mae'r bwysig yn ddod i'r hyffordd yma sy'n bryd 25 oed yn oed yn gweithio ar gyfer y rhan, yn ymgyrch yma, yn ymgyrch am ymgyrch, ond yn ymbydd yma mae'r ysgrifennu yn ymgyrch. Yma, yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch ar eu syniadol, yn ymgyrch yn Ysgrifennu, yn ymgyrch, yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch, yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch, yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch, On i ni'n dweud wrth bydd teimlo, yn cael ei wneud beth cwylau amferio'n mynd felly gweithio'n gynwedigau o bach ysgrif этомau a gwrando'r cyllid o aturdodau, rwy'n mynd i gynnwys i'r bach yr hynny. On i ni'n wedi gweithio, opent yn dweud, y ffrindiad lleol o'r ffferd trwy'r hollig mluol, ond anodd bynnwyd yn oed o'n wleisio. Rhyn yn y gweithio arno, os ymniffyryd o'r ffrindiad, rydyn ni i ddweud y mynd i oddploddwymi. Mae'n mynd i'r adreft er oeddaelol yn ddiweddol, wedi gael ei bod ni'n ddweud, efallai fyddech chi'n gweld mewn i'r prenodydd. Hynny, mae'r ddiaboddwympwyr yn ddau'r ddim wlad yn ei gweithiau dros ynteill yma y Welch. Mae coal oeddaeth a'u gyffredinodaeth gyd yn ddweud, bywyd yn ddweud maen nhw deithas a ddweud bod nhw mewn gweld cyfryddol i'r ddweud. ond dyfodd. Suporwadwy i'w amdweud... Felly ond, dyna'r symud, dyna'r gwith gweithfyrdd neu ond ferwodd gan drws ff 안 didd. The group to study meant a specific, very narrow thing. It consisted of the classify, drawing and making sense of the stuff through comprehensive aim to establish chronological and cultural frameworks for this thing. Mae'r rheswm wedi gweithio am bobl hwnnw yn gweithio'r gwaith, ac mae'r gweithio'r gwaith mae'r ddweud eich bod yn cael eu gwithafolau gwahanol ar y llyniadau cyfnodolol a'r cyfnodol o llyniadau cyllideb yn y dyfynol. Felly mae'r gweithio'r gwaith o'r cwld, ac mae'r gwaith fod yn gynyddu, mae'n gweithio'r gwaith yn gweithio'r gwaith ymdweud. new ideas were of course already stirring back then and new methods were being applied but often in its sort of disorderly and intellectually innocent way radio carbon for example was growing in importance at the time but people were not totally clear about what to do with the new dates that were coming coming out thick and fast or another example a new interest in landscape archaeology was growing at the time all of a sudden everyone was doing landscape and gis of course I was still stuck with pottery um or other scientific methods were applying were being applied to archaeological problems yet the problems themselves were often um were often the same as before social complexity state formation things that had been debated since the 1980s and still dominated the research agenda in later prehistory it was very much a case of new methods being applied to old problems and science playing a secondary or ancillary role to archaeology not driving the agenda and if you think about the role of science now 25 years on with the scientists in the front seat and the archaeology struggle to get control of of the steering wheel it's very much uh uh it's it's sort of an inversion of roles so so things have changed a lot um it was also a world in which debate followed national agendas and country boundaries by larger and consider how the new social problems that started being debated in Britain at the time gendered the body the ancestors were largely ignored in Italian and other continental research traditions and in these areas too of course we have made enormous strides so Marianne is now presenting some of these uh some of these strides and breakthroughs of the last 20 years. Yeah thanks Andrea yeah we what what I'd like to talk about today is um some of the most relevant advances that we have made in this field in the past 25 years this in this respect obviously I'm going to speak about archaeological science first which moved forward significantly because methods have improved analytical cost drop down and procedure have increased and experts in the field have managed to probably more than elsewhere in archaeology to share data and information in the best interest of the discipline for example through data repositories, web platforms etc etc as an example in this case for example Pinazio now and Intel's work in 2015 on optimal DNA yield linked to extraction from the precious bone has boosted ancient DNA projects that have increased by over 300% in the last 15 five years and I'm saying 300% but really I think it's more than that so it's quite it's quite interesting this has however triggered some legitimate second thoughts on the utility and purpose of destructive analysis only a few years a few days ago a comment on nature invited the scientific community to a greater sense of responsibility when managing ancient remains I don't know if anybody of you have read this but it's like okay it's a cautionary tale about what we should do with the bones whether we should use them simply or maybe think twice before we actually go and extract DNA from everything basically but despite some criticism it is beyond doubt that the past 25 years have witnessed a transition of archaeological science from the ancillary role of providing data to support bigger questions to a milieu where actually questions are formed shaped and sometimes revolutionized through science the interest of the scientific community in the discipline is also witnessed by the increasing number of journals on the subject we have now become a desired target for publication for most of us from isolated case studies we have refined our sample strategy humans and foreigners then botanical remains then further compounds we have also widened our research horizons that went from it for example extremely small scale resolution to large cultural phenomena the use of archaeological science in fact has triggered new debates precisely in the central Mediterranean I should say where evidence of the consumption of new or different resources for example appear to be a key issue let's think about the middle paleolithic and the full consumption around Europe or the millet question that we all know know about then connectivity has grown into one of the main subjects of research discussing in the central Mediterranean region following suggestion firstly advanced by Ngha Mblaid some 15 years ago which in turn were based on the seminal work by historians Hauden and Purcell connectivity has in fact developed into a meta theme for research in the Mediterranean for history complementing other strands of social and economic studies and creating a new paradigm for explaining several interrelated social dynamics in the prehistory of the middle sea network approaches developed in the last few years have provided the opportunity to formalize analysis of ancient connectivity in a way that can help scholars formulate new research question and hypothesis the starting point of this approach is that connection are more sorry are more important than individual identities this has paid a major role in revitalizing traditional typological work extending its exploratory and explanatory power to previously understudied social dynamics and yet this new interest in network analysis carries the risk of losing sites of human agency and social dynamics behind nodes and edges can network try without some sort of theoretical assumption and explicit ideas about high society work in the effect of interaction the answer is probably no and one of the future challenges we face is to inject network analysis with new explanatory models regarding prehistoric society another theme developed in the last 25 years is island archaeology and seascape in the 1990 research approaches still had a processional outlook with a strong emphasis on model testing quantification and generalization considerable weight has placed on ecological and environmental factors the last two decades have seen new definition of seascape behind introduced emphasising the behaviour and perception of the people living on island the same years saw a collapse of faith in the biogeographic notion of island as bound in naturally defined areas for investigation one of the most important studies in this respect is that of Helen Dawson which explores the complexity of Mediterranean islands colonization looking into multi-factor explanation and previously neglected demographic issue there are of course many other themes and problems that were newly explored in the last 25 years but we have no time to touch upon all of them here many of these will be discussed in the following papers along with new data and research I mean you instead are being opened just now so thank you