 Thank you very much. The member for Shoza, Mr. Speaker. Member for Shoza, the bill, the resolution that we are dealing with here today is basically completely different to the health and security level, levy. And I want to inform you that it was a budgetary statement but the appropriate legislation to come to this horrible house. I just want to say something because, you know, we either have a shock memory or we pretend not to remember all things. Do you know, Mr. Speaker, that the government of United Workers Party in which I don't know whether the member for Shoza was in it, they actually passed a security tax? Yes. No, Mr. Speaker, these are the things that you know, Mr. Speaker, they big you and cry about this the first time it ever happened and we're not supposed to do that. You know, Mr. Speaker, I'll read to you number 21 of 2001 an act to provide further input number 21 of 2011 St. Lucia is called a security tax act what? No, I said not nobody was there 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 ḍᴀᴒᴍᴍᴇ ᴀᴀᴇᴏᴀ ᴅᴀ ᴀᴀᴇᴏᴇᴏᴀᴇ. ᴀᴀ ᴅ ᴅᴀᴀᴀ ᴀ ᴀᴀᴀᴇᴏ ᴅ ᴀᴀᴀᴏ ᴅ ᴀᴀᴀ ᴀᴀ. It's because do you know that the government of the United Workers Party, passed such an act in Central Russia? But not the man of the fuck, don't, don't, don't jump on him. The member of the State of Kashi's Noff admitted and he said there was a reason to pass it. There's the same reason… no… ۖ ۖ ۖ ۚ ۖ ۔ ۖ ۚ ۖ ۖ ۘ ۖ ۖ ۣ ۚ ۣ ۖ ۖ ۛ ی ۔ ۚ ۘ ۙ ە ۛ ې ۛ ە ۠ ۟ ۓ ە ۛ ە ۖ ە ۖ ې , ۝ ۜ ۞ ە ۓ ۛ ۝ ۖ ۛ ۖ ۝ ۔ ۔ ۜ ۓ ۝ ە ۚ ۗ ۜ ۝ ے ۜ ۓ ۚ ە ە, ە ۝ ە ە ە ە ۔,  for the imposition and collection of our security tax and for related matters. Yes and no, and the people who support these things. They do not do the research, you know. Before you run and you support something. Do some research. And look at it. And I made it clear that the security, health and security level will not be placed on full items. Look at that bill here. The same bill. That he passed when he was in the minister. They exclude full items also. So you know Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker. And people follow these things. And people repeat these things. And people make a whole you and cry. How can you live? How can you live with a 2.5% security level? How can you live with it? But they pass it. What does it does not hire? No it does not hire. It does not hire Mr. Speaker. So Mr. Speaker, the difference is that and you do not know what I will say when I pass the bill. Because the bill has not been passed. I was very clear. I said a 2.5% health and security level and I will not put unnecessary administrative burdens on the administration of the act. That's what I said. You see Mr. Speaker. I take my word seriously. But I do not know what it will be able to say. Say I said something today. And next I said nothing. And say I did not say it. And I did not say that and this and that. You understand Mr. Speaker. So that's what. So Mr. Speaker for sure is that. Only one more for sure is that. These are two completely different things. The resolution he passed in today is to deal with money that has been seized. Proceeds of crime. Not the security level. So do not mix the two together. You will have your turn to debate the security level. Because we have to change the legislation for the security level. The same way we have to change the VAT legislation to remove VAT on some building materials. The same way we have to come and do that in the parliament. And the same way we have to come in the parliament to cause people who owe on the VAT arrest to remove the tax and the interest on this VAT arrest to help the private sector. We have to come here and do that also. So with your turn. Your turn will come to debate it. So these are two completely different. These are two completely different. These are two completely different things. But I thank you. I thank you for your support. And I urge members to support this bill. No but I. I serve you to suffrage the extra one. Nobody is supposed to get the one in suffrage. Seriously. Mr. Speaker Mr. Speaker Mr. Speaker Talking about the record Mr. Speaker The member from Mikusov rose on three occasions Now I know he was going on the right track but I know he gets so much blows today I was in the parliament that I tried my best to let him have a better day but he pushed me and I've warned him about pushing me I've told him the same way underestimated me and I put him and he lost the election he continues to underestimate me So I'm going to call his bluff Economic and social review 22 Page 40 What he's talking about unemployment Let's read it Simple reading Pull your copy Take care Page 40 I'm waiting for you Do you want to share my review? Come on Information Are you too close? Information contained in the annual labour force report for the central statistical office CSO is the result of the household labour force survey conducted during 2022 is aimed at providing information about the level of participation of household members in the labour force and the size of the labour force is 15 years and over CSO always tries to ensure that our procedures and processes for the implementation of the labour force survey are in keeping with proven methodologies Therefore the results represent the collateral responses of a sample of households interviewed during the period in question and not the opinion of the central statistical office Results from sample surveys are always estimates not precise figures additionally for the period on the review the CSO collaborates the CSO collaborates with the International Labour Organization ILO for verification of the labour force results yes teacher the estimates the estimates obtained by the ILO for the employment rates resulted in 0.8% less less less than what's there so that means 10 from 0.8 is 9.2 right? arithmetic actually ILO actually said that our employment rate is less let's go this is due to the question of the labour force survey about discourage worker which is taken into account by the CSO in the calculation of the employment rates the results for this period do not correspond to the data collected period from 2020-2021 which normally runs for a quarter and may have lost comparability with the amount recorded in 2022 in the statistical series the previous situation of COVID has negatively impacted the collection of data for the quarter within the period 2021 thus the results predominantly reflect developments in the labour force additionally for the period on the review the CSO collaborated with the international labour organization for verification and audit of the labour force results in this regard it should be noted that the unemployment rate calculated by the ILO is less than that reported by the CSO this is because the ILO employs a stricter definition of unemployed individuals which excludes discourage workers