 I'm not sure if we're live or not, let's check this out. There we go. It's a little bit of slow live stream. Losing some of the connection. Well, hopefully to hold up, hi everyone. Today is October 18th, 2019, 1.30 p.m. And we're doing a drop in math tutoring session for the 2019-2020 school year. And this is drop in math tutoring session number five, okay? And we're basically gonna do just open discussion for high school mathematics. If you have any questions, we'll try to help you out. And we've done a few of these. And if you're following the videos that we're loading up on Bichoud and YouTube, right now I'm in the process of loading up some early childhood education videos. We've loaded one on for how I go about teaching counting. One, the next one coming up is gonna be how I teach adding. And one following that is how I teach multiplication because they follow each other, right? And those are basically segments of a two hour video that I shot, that I've edited. And it's gonna be the complete video is gonna be loaded up following as soon as we get the multiplication up and going, okay? And I think I'm gonna do a few more of those things. I assume I might actually start doing a lot of how I go about teaching certain concepts and mathematics in elementary and high school level. I know I sort of covered that stuff when I do do the teaching, when I do the lessons, right? It comes out the way I'm teaching, but I think it's pretty important to, basically for educators, for parents, for homeschoolers, just for them to give, for me to give them the mindset to provide sort of my thought process of how I go about teaching certain concepts and mathematics, specifically directly towards people who are homeschooling educators, teachers, parents, whoever, right? Hello, Saint, just Germany. How are you doing? I hope you're doing well, brother. Welcome to another live stream, mathematics, mathematics. And I'm very chill today. I've been editing and shooting videos and doing a lot of work and getting a few new students popping in, getting in touch with me. So it's been a fun ride so far this school year. Hello, Chicho. Robert the Toob, how are you doing? Have you ever read the Wiki article, math, mathicism? I'm doing good. Thanks, how are you doing? Good, good, good. I've never read it. I don't know what that means. Math, math, mathicism. Math, I'm gonna look this up. Math, math, math, Math, Math. Math, Math, Math, math, what is this? Math, Math, Math, Math. Math, Math, Math, Math. Is any opinion viewpoint, school of thought or philosophy that states that everything can be described, defined, modeled ultimately by mathematics or that the universe and reality, both material and mental, spiritual are fundamentally fully, only mathematical, i.e. that everything is mathematics, everything is mathematics necessity, necessitating the ideas of logic, reason, mind, and spirit. This is the first time I'm hearing about it. Do I agree with this? I keep on saying that everything's mathematics. It's our attempt at trying to quantify the world and understand it better and stuff like this, and there is 100% I believe that is the case, but do I believe that mathematics has the ability to quantify everything based on the language that we've come up with? No, I don't, because mathematics has one restriction that we know of, where we cannot divide by zero, but division by zero occurs in our formulas and our functions. So we know that it is a thing, we just don't know what the end result is. There's two possibilities. You go on forever or you explode the universe, right? So there is, what is that? This was a Godu that did the inconsistency theorem where basically saying that if you're within a box of any mindset, then the system you're analyzing the world from within that box is not complete. There's going to be, if you come outside the box, you'll find the problems basically. That's my philosophy, but generally, yeah, we can explore the world through the realm of mathematics without a doubt, without a doubt, without a doubt. On the spiritual level, possibly, yes, because you can explore through the realm of entheogens and stuff like this and chemical reaction and we don't, like, our knowledge of us is so limited, it's insane where people say science said this. Science is always in flux, right? Science has said many things before in the past that have been wrong, right? So this whole dogma of science, our scientific community consensus was this, therefore, is true, is flawed. If we look at throughout history, we'll find out that some of the greatest minds in the world in human history have been persecuted by the scientific community, right? Olive, how are you doing? How's life? I hope you're enjoying this Friday afternoon, Friday morning, Friday evening, Saturday morning, Saturday middle of the night, Saturday afternoon, right? I hope you guys are doing well. I like getting into the back, back into the mathematics and I got my editor up, right? So I've been editing videos back into editing video mode, right? So there's going to be a lot of edited video popping up on bit shoot on YouTube with the lapel mic and the HD camera and stuff. So it's fun doing that, fun getting back into the rhythm of things and messing around with different editors. Friday evening here, I'm doing good, thank you. Awesome, awesome. Europe, Europe, there's a lot of stuff going on in Europe. But we do tomorrow, by the way, for those of you interested, tomorrow we're doing a live stream on current events starting at starting at 11 a.m. from 11 a.m. until 1 p.m. on Saturday, October 19th. We're going to do a live stream on current events, okay? And there's a lot of stuff going on there. As far as a mathematics front goes, open discussion. Let me talk about anything you guys want and what do you call that? Math-centric, for sure. Science-centric, chemistry, physics. Oh, more physics, I guess. So one core essence of this approach is maybe we didn't invent mathematics but discovered it, which is possibly true, which is the code that the whole universe was based on. We do math discoveries, not math inventions. Agreed? Like zero was not an invention, it was a discovery of the number zero. Those people, they detach math from science, saying about scientific statements exactly what you said. And state, and state. Mathematic truth, greater in scientific truth. That I would agree with. St. just Germany, that I agree with. Mathematics truth, Trump's scientific truth. And I think we should change it from mathematics truth to mathematical reasoning. Trump's scientific reasoning. But science, the core language that science is built on, is mathematics. However, there's a lot of false interpretation of data in the scientific community. We know that as a fact, right? There are scientists out there that take kickbacks from corporations. They massage the numbers to present the perspective that the corporations want. There's scientists out there that have a certain ideology, or stuck in a certain dogma, and they massage their numbers to present their biases. There's scientists out there that are limited according to the countries they live in, the laws of the land, where they're not allowed to conduct certain types of scientific experiments. For example, science on cannabis was criminalized, or has been criminalized, mainly illegal around the globe, but in the United States, in Canada, in Europe, or whatever in the Western world, it was criminalized for decades. Any scientists that wanted to scientifically examine the health benefits, the spiritual benefits, the emotional benefits of cannabis, would be thrown in jail, right? So there was a lot of underground, not a lot, but some underground research done in the scientific community on the benefits of cannabis. One of the ones that I read, which was 10, 15 years ago, was a check in the Czech Republic, I believe. I believe it was a Czech Republic. They conducted an experiment where they introduced cannabis. It was all under the undertable, right? Because if it was above board, then the doctor's scientists would have been arrested and thrown in jail, right? But basically what they did was provide cannabis to people who had Parkinson's and tried to see the effects of cannabis on Parkinson's, and it was all beneficial, right? Like crazy, it was insane. Like people, their life, their lives improved dramatically, right? And that is, you know, the limitations of science. You have to abide by the laws of the land. Mathematics has no limitations in large part, right? You can do mathematics and not break any laws, as far as I know, right? I was just about to say your voice would be great for ASMR. Then I saw the title, yeah, came out. I put out a lot of ASMR videos, brother. Fun. There is this distinction. Truth of facts and truth of reason. Science is about truths of facts. Sky is blue, based on observation, where math is about truths of reason. Facts can change. Maybe someday sky is red. Reason is like eternal truth. 1 plus 1 equals 2. Reason is like eternal truth. Why does 1 plus 1 have to be 2? Sit, kiss, are men and? It doesn't necessarily have to be 2. If you take just the numerical value, natural value of 1 plus 1, you get 2, right? However, if you start introducing units or vectors into the equation of 1 plus 1, here, let me show you guys this. Because this, this I like, I use this when I'm trying to teach certain concepts, right? Where, for example, what I always say is 1 plus 1 could be a maximum of 2. And that's not even true, right? But at least that's one level beyond this, right? So 1 plus 1, 1 plus 1 is equal to 2, right? 1 vector unit, 1 vector, let's call this vector 1, right? Plus a vector that goes this way, here, vector 1, vector 2, its magnitude is 1, right? If you add those guys together, then you're not going to get a 2, right? And if that's 90 degrees separation, 90 degrees, let's put it here, you would have this going this way, that's 90 degrees, that's 1, that's 1, right? And the resultant of this vector plus that vector is going to be this guy, which is v3, right? And v3 is going to be the, you can drive it from the Pythagorean theorem, right? You can go a squared plus b squared is equal to c squared, which is 1 squared plus 1 squared is equal to v3 squared. So 2 is equal to v3 squared, and you square root both sides, so this is equal to square root of 2. It's a magnitude, right? So that's one way you could have it. On a rudimentary level, you could say, oh, here's vector 1 plus vector 2, this is equal to zero, right? If they're going in opposite directions, if you add them up, right? So it really depends. It really depends. It depends what it is that you're measuring. But when it comes to number theory, I guess, I don't know if it's called number theory, 1 plus 1 is 2. That's one of the core axioms of what mathematics is built on, okay? Is one unit of something plus another unit of something equal to units of the same thing? It depends. Like people say you can't add apples and oranges, right? So here's an apple, apple plus an orange. If you try to add those, you get one apple and one orange, one apple plus one orange. Or if you add one apple plus an orange, you get two pieces of fruit, two fruit, right? You change the units. So once you take mathematics and apply it in the real world, you can play around with some of the absolutes, I guess. What did you call the v? What does it mean? I just gave it a variable v. It could have been anything. It's just a variable. But when you put a line up top there, it means it's a vector. So what it is, is a vector has both magnitude and a direction, right? If you just write down 1 plus 1 or x, x plus x. So one x plus another x is two x's, right? Period. But if we have x, which is a vector plus x, here x1, x2. x1 plus x2 is two x's, right? But x1 that is a vector plus x2, that actually I shouldn't put x2 here. They're both x's, right? But if you have one x which is a vector plus another x which is a vector, then their directions might be different. So the result you have to drive from basically trigonometry. So when I call it a v, it doesn't necessarily have to be v. It could be x put that on top, y put that on top, right? W put that on top. It just means this has magnitude and a direction associated with it. But yeah, binary 1 plus 1 is a good example too. Like when you're... I gotta look up the terminology. I'm not prepared to talk about this too much. But basically measurements of 2's and measurements of... what do you call it? Your base is different, right? If your base is 2 or your base is 4, your base is 6, or whatever your base is, right? It's about this. If you have one entity and add another entity, you have double the entities. As long as the entities are exactly the same entities, it's about math logic. The question is, can reality have another logic? Whereas this logic, reality itself, I think it could be another logic. I think at some point, maybe, maybe, if not us coming up with a completely new language that replaces mathematics, which I don't think is going to happen, at some point we're going to get an extension pack that's going to layer itself on top of the core mathematics we know. It's just like games that you get expansion packs and all of a sudden your world becomes much larger. I think what's going to happen is we're going to look at the mathematics we know, and at some point we're going to say, hey, for the problems that we're encountering with mathematics, the main one being we cannot divide by zero, all of a sudden we can introduce a new way of doing things or a new way to look at this thing to travel at the speed of light, travel faster in the speed of light, create a wormhole, right? There will be at some point, my belief, my limited understanding, that at some point we're going to have to break that boundary. I hope so anyway. I hope so. I think maybe when we do it through music vibrations, we'll see. Human brain is an expert at finding patterns that exist and don't exist, agreed. Because of this, it's also easy to get stuck in the same old patterns and laws. Many problems have been solved by thinking outside the box, yeah. And there's so many patterns. People make connections to things, and everybody does it. I've done it, you do it, everybody does it, where you look at something, look at a system and go, oh, there's a pattern there, and you incorporate that pattern into your life, and then maybe a few minutes later, up to never, you know, a few decades later, you realize, oh, there was no pattern there, right? You were living your life based on this philosophy that didn't really exist, based on this belief system that really didn't exist. We're pattern recognition machines. We're so good at it, as Stix Arminen says, we see patterns where patterns do not exist, right? Which is one of the places where chaos three kicks in, chaos three kicks, chaos theory kicks in, right? Which is super cool. I really like the chaos three theory stuff, some of the stuff anyway. Like trying to understand climate, trying to understand weather, right? It's chaotic. Over the long period, you know, it's got a time span on it. We can only make predictions of what the weather is going to be like for short periods at a time, right? Hey, nice baldy head, came ups. My TV isn't working properly. I should call the service company, but I hit it hard in the side, and now it works perfectly. Try calculating for that. Something's loose enough, TV, right? And why are you watching TV anyway? And this has got to be an old school TV. It's a tube TV, isn't it? I don't think it's going to work if you hit the LED TVs or the plasma TVs and stuff. I think hitting TVs only worked for the cathode ray tube TVs, right? Everybody's done it. If you have those cathode TVs, I've done it. Right, bang, it works. Great. The color's off. Oh, what? Bang. Oh, the color's on again. The counter strike, no. Not yet. I'm not into the counter strike yet. Oops. I'm not into playing games right now. I'm crazy busy and enjoying what I'm doing. Ftl speed, etc. Ftl, Ftl. What does Ftl stand for? Is no problem in math, only in science today using math as a tool. Math extensions, like game DLCs. Could they overwrite what we find true for now? Maybe. Maybe. I think some of the things that we find to be absolutes right now are total fallacies. I mean, in math history, was there a situation where we had to dump certain math statements, like we falsify scientific statements all the time. Same just remain. There's one thing, one example I have in mathematics. Imaginary numbers. When the even root of negative numbers came about when we did the real number set, right? Oh, faster than the light speed, I should know that, right? Faster than the light speed. Thank you very much, Vip. WQ. Vipsy. Cube. My respect. I used to hit my grandpa's TV all the time. Are you vegan? No. Is there any chance for me cooking? Oh, dude, I just made a ton of hamburgers, like three days ago. At some point, I'm going to show you guys how to make these hamburgers. I got the recipe from my mom and it's the first time I made these hamburgers. Short for Viper. Ah, Viper. Okay, cool. Viper. Thank you for that. I got the recipe from my mom and it's like the shish kebab stuff, where I loaded on the pictures, but it doesn't have one ingredient in there and they were really good. Like, I'm eating hamburgers for like two days, three days now. Last ones, we're going to finish today. So at some point, I'm going to show you how to make the hamburgers. As far as, thanks Viper. As far as the one thing, if you take the real number set, natural numbers, whole numbers, integers, rational and irrational, right? And we talked about this. This is a real number set, human evolution, human thought, what we thought about. Integers, right? With every boundary here, there was new problems being created, right? Over here went from natural numbers, one, two, three, all the way up. This one, discovery of number zero, we'll create a new thing called whole numbers and then we had positive and negative numbers, right? For integers, negative whole numbers. So dot, dot, dot, negative two, negative one, zero, one, two, dot, dot, dot. This created problems when we're taking even roots of things, right? So square root of four is plus or minus two. But square root of negative four, when, as far as I know, when we discovered this, we didn't know what it was, right? So they gave it the name imaginary numbers. How do you spell imaginary? Imaginary, my square root of imaginary, I don't know how to spell it. Imaginary numbers, right? I have brain force when it comes to spelling. Imaginary numbers. They called it imaginary numbers because they thought this was a by-product of the mathematics. They didn't think this stuff had any real meaning, as far as I know, right? I could be wrong in recalling what I've heard about this regarding its history, right? And then later on, hundreds of years later, we found out, oh, these aren't imaginary numbers. We should call them complex numbers. Complex numbers. Because they're the square root, really the square root of negative one, which we call I, which comes into play when it comes to electricity, water flow and stuff in the real world, right? So that's one place where we thought these things were bogus. And then we found applications for them, right? I should do acronyms. My mind goes everywhere with words, right? So and once I learn it, if I see it again, I try to remember it, right? It's not weird that all calculators are wrong. Even even new ones are sometimes wrong. Even the ones that are right could actually be wrong. And the ones we claimed was wrong could end up being correct in the future, maybe. Calculations, yes. I wonder about math logic and general math statements being wrong at some point. Do I know of anything beside this? I don't know. I don't think so. Math logic and math statements are based on calculations. Are they based on calculations or is that true? They're based on axioms. So as long as you stay true to your axioms and you're moving things around properly, introducing new things, combining different things together, I don't think the statement would be wrong unless in the calculations, in the algebra people made a mistake or the assumptions were incorrect. But true mathematics, pure mathematics, shouldn't really have too many assumptions associated with it, should it? As far as I know, radars use imaginary numbers. I should know this but I don't. Because of geophysics, we did, I did a lot of radar surveys and stuff like this. And I don't remember if, because everything was running through software, right? The theory, I don't remember because I studied the theory in university and we applied it a little bit when I was doing geophysics but I can't remember if it involves that or not. Most likely it does. I think imaginary numbers or complex numbers appear in many places from what I understand. They should anyway. They do appear in many places, I believe. It's something that I haven't dialed into too much. It may be wrong if it is. I'm sorry. No, no worries Vibra. I'm pretty sure some of the things I'm saying are wrong. So disclaimer, don't take anything I say too seriously. Everything with a grain of salt, right? If you're interested in it, look it up. I don't want to be, take on the responsibility to to say that everything I believe, everything I say is 100% crap, right? I have no desire to be in that position. I'm just acting as a node and sharing info and willing to change my perspective on things, hopefully anyway. Can you guys hear the rain? It's raining really hard. It's nice. It's very chill here right now. Very chill. Friday afternoon. Hope you guys have nice plans for the weekend. It's fall so you better be eating some root vegetables, healthy root vegetables. Local healthy root vegetables. I love a good rainstorm too. Yeah. The one thing we don't get here that I miss that we got when I lived in Alberta for a while and I lived in Ontario for a long while and Montreal and stuff and go back. I miss lightning storms. We get a little bit of lightning storms here but not too much. It's brilliant. Love. What a phenomenal thing to witness, right? Really puts things into perspective. I wish it was raining here. It's calming to listen to. Very calming to listen to. I love how people bang two metal objects together next to my ears. So calming. I don't think the people bang. I don't think automatically people bang but it's legit. I don't think that's very calming. Of course if you're in a symphony. Have you ever done? I used to play drums hitting the cymbals. It's pretty loud. Pretty loud. Pretty loud. I think scientific statements are based on calculations where math statements are based on logic only. I could be wrong. I don't think you're wrong Saint Joseph. One of the things with scientific statements is this. All of the science that we're applying right now every theory has assumptions associated with it. Really. Whatever you read from the scientific community there's assumptions that they have before they look at the data, process the data and interpret the data. In their calculations, in their collecting of data, in their interpretation of data, in their trying to present, understand what the data represents, there's assumptions that play in all of them. All of them. What if some of our core assumptions are flawed? The ultimate assumption in science, especially when it comes to geology, the geologic scale and how the universe came to be and stuff like this, is the uniformitarian principle which is basically law of uniformitarianism. I can't even pronounce it. I have to read it and say it's a little bit too old to it. And that basically says the rate of change that is occurring right now was the same rate of change that occurred in the past. I have a problem with that assumption. I think it's true for many things that we talk about when it comes to our lifespans, but I think there's a flaw in there. We can't assume that time and rate of change is basically time. So they're saying the time it takes for things to happen at the present was the same amount of time that it took for the same thing to occur in the past. But time, the rate at which time changes, can be manipulated either through acceleration or through increase and decrease in math and changing the mass. So I have an issue with that assumption. So I agree with Saint Just Germany. Science has a lot of assumptions associated with it. Mathematics doesn't. Mathematics is a whole bunch of core truths that as long as the mathematics is being done properly, they're all, everything else is layered on those truths. So it's logic. All spring, fall and almost whole winter, it's raining in Sweden. Yeah, in Vancouver, all the fall, a huge chunk of winter and a fair fair chunk of spring rings in the west coast of BC. There were some crazy thunderstorms over here in New Jersey. Even a few tornadoes. Oh, you guys have tornadoes in New Jersey. Is that like normal? I didn't realize New Jersey gets tornadoes. What? Water sprouts. We get some really good storms here in the Norwegian west coast. Cool. We get amazing rainstorms and wind. It's just lacking the thunder and lightning. It's too humid here. You need dry to get the lightning. I really miss snow. We don't get a lot in London. I'm assuming it's London. London. Yeah, London. Yeah, that might change if the currents in the ocean change, right? And I miss it a little bit as well. We don't get too much snow in the west coast. Unless you go into the mountains. The amount of energy is even a weak storm. It's incredible, incredible, incredible. Dante, how's it going, brother? Hope you're doing well, man. Hope you're doing well. On average, there's one or two weak tornadoes in New Jersey per year. Really? Wow. I've only seen one tornado in life, in real life, when I was a kid. And it was grand. It was huge. Aside from that, when I was living in Alberta, I tried to chase a couple tornadoes find them, but I was too late. Chicho, yes. I like the analogy with the chess game. Science is about finding laws and laws in the chess game. First discovery, pawns can move one field. Second disc, at the start they can move two fields. Third disc, they can become the queen at the end of the game field. Okay, cool. But science needs to witness a play to get conclusions. Math doesn't need observations, I believe. Just thinking. Again, I might be wrong. No, I think that's a great way of putting it, actually. For science, we need to observe, right? We need to, for something to become theory, we need to be able to replicate, right? When it comes to, especially in medicine and stuff, you need to be able to replicate and experiment on the results, right? Mathematics does not require replication. Mathematics just requires authentication, I guess, with people going through a proof to make sure all the calculations were done correctly. So that's a great example, actually, St. just for a minute. I'm going to start using it. I'm going to try to keep it in mind, right? For science, we need observation. We need experimentation, right? We need repetition, right? With mathematics, we don't need observation, we don't need experimentation, we don't need repetition. We just need to use the laws, the axioms of mathematics, the theorems, the proofs that we have already, the absolutes to come up with new things. Maybe, if we're wrong, someone please let us know. Either right now live or in the comments of this video, it's going to be loaded on the YouTube. Let us know. I'm curious. Is that a good way of looking at it? It might be. It might be a fantastic way of looking at it, actually. Yeah, interesting topic, St. just for a minute. To me, it's my problem with science, tahini. As you can tell, I eat a lot of tahini. One of the problems I have with science is all of, there's multiple problems actually, but one of the core problems is science has to operate within the boundaries of laws of a nation, man-made laws, legality, right? So as soon as you put legality into the realm of science, you're restricting scientific discoveries, right? So that's one of the problems I have. The other major problem I have is the money that controls science, right? The other main problem I have is censorship within the scientific community with all this scientific papers and whatnot and putting scientific papers behind paywalls. They're restricting science. It's the capitalist of science. It's commodification of science, right? So I think we've got a long ways to go before we fully can discover many other things in this world that we are totally oblivious to because of man-made interventions into scientific discoveries. I think it's horrendous personally. I think it's disgusting actually. Just imagine, how many hundreds of millions of people were forced to suffer tremendous amount of pain and anguish and their relatives because man-made laws prevented scientists from conducting experiments to understand the full benefit of cannabis, right? Wow! Wow! Wow! Wow! That to me, when people really appreciate what that means, it should blow everybody's mind, right? It should blow everybody's mind. You should question everything coming out of the centralized institutions once you fully appreciate what these prohibitions have meant to our civilization, right? Robert Anton Wilson called it coming out of the dark ages. Basically a genocide was being committed on those who wanted to explore the realm of entheogens for centuries, right? For decades at least, right? So there was a restricting flow of information. It's an incredible hemp. Make clothes out of hemp, make rope out of hemp, make fuel out of hemp, make paper out of hemp, make medicine out of hemp, make oils out of hemp, make, make, get protein, right? Out of hemp seeds, right? Like hemp hearts or whatever. Make, like, so much, so much. This just continues and continues, right? Just imagine, just imagine. Next time, like for me, I'm brutal with people that support prohibition. I am so hard on them. So hard on them, man. So hard on them. Because they're the those people who, there's a lot of people that are programmed, brainwashed through that, right? I have CBD oil. Yeah, CBD oil for inflammation, for muscle pain relief, for nausea, right? Just imagine how many hundreds of millions of people have gone through chemotherapy and radiation over the last few decades. Like hundreds of millions of people, right? And one of the first symptoms of, or what do you call it, side effects of radiation and chemotherapy is nausea. You lose your appetite. You vomit. You can't keep food down, right? And you need to keep food down. You need to eat to be able to have a fighting chance, right? So you need food to be able to live. Meanwhile, cannabis reduces nausea, increases your appetite. But what did the medical system do, right? They brought in pharmaceuticals and were giving people pills to reduce their nausea and increase their appetite and those pills had side effects. Crazy, crazy, right? Give me some CBD, some real pure honey and garlic, and I will live forever. And yogurt. Yogurt. Yogurt is essential as well. Yogurt is essential and pure honey for sure. Like just to let you know here, one of the ways I use garlic, ear infections, right? For youth, I'm prone to ear infections or whatever it is, right? I've taken a lot of antibiotics in the past, right? But I reduced the antibiotics. There's been cases where I feel throat infection or chest infection or ear infection kicking in. I buy a jar of pickled garlic, organic jar of pickled garlic, right? Or not necessarily organic, but raw pickled garlic just with salt and vinegar or whatever it is, right? Brine, right? I'd make garlic sandwiches and eat garlic sandwiches. My breath stinks for a couple of weeks, but I don't take antibiotics. Try not to anyway. There are times when you do need modern medicine, right? Don't deprive yourself of life just because pharmaceutical companies are evil literally, right? Olive oil might help too. Olive oil. Yeah, olive oil. Although there are huge potentials in CBD and cannabis use, we still have to admit. By the way, if you have any math questions, drop them. I'm here making myself available for a couple hours to help anyone that requires mathematics, math help. If not, we'll just continue with our discussion. It is about information and we love it, right? Although there are huge potentials in CBD and cannabis use, we still have to admit the data and numbers are not fully in and investigated in a large enough scale to make it concrete. This means there are still potentially high risks that we are not aware of, though the general opinion is not indicative of that. Here's a kicker, uh, merely human, right? Why don't we have the data? We don't have the data because the scientific community, not the scientific community, the political realm, right? Laws of the land prevented scientists from collecting data. And why did the laws, why did prohibition come into play around the globe? It was America's war on drugs that instigated it. Why did America's war on drugs begin? Because of racism, because of corporatism, because of commodification, not because of science, but because of economics, because of control, regulatory capture, right? As far as potential data, not according to our present scientific method where you, you know, do your seven steps or whatever it is and collect it all. However, cannabis has been tested through human civilization. It's one of the oldest plants used for food, medicine, oils, fuel, and everything else, right? It's been a part of humanity forever, since before we were on this planet, most likely. Okay, so I sort of disagree that the scientific, there isn't a consensus in the scientific community that it has a lot of benefits. Human history tells us it's got a tremendous amount of benefits. The only reason we don't have the hard data, the one that the scientific community, the scientific realm right now gives a worth to is because of laws, man-made laws, right? Here's a pill. You need to take this pill for the side effects and for the side effects of this pill, you need to take this pill. 100%, big business, big business, right? My conclusion is that holistic methodology often overlooks science solutions that are present, proven, easy to attain. Agreed? To a certain degree, merely human. I don't, there's a lot of people that are delusional, right? They have infections and they don't realize that they need to take antibiotics, right? I agree with you that a lot of people are taking half-truths and really not understanding what those things mean and trying to incorporate into their lives without doing due diligence, right? So that's part of our education system. My thing is this part of our education system, people have been, are being indoctrinated to be subservient to power. So whatever power says, authority says they tend to believe, right? That authority may be just someone online with a beautiful website telling them, oh do this and you'll feel great or authority could be from a centralized state. I think as human beings we have the responsibility for our own decisions, right? If you decide to believe in a charlatan, snake oil salesman, whose responsibility is that? Is that your responsibility or the state's responsibility to to interfere in your stup, you know, to try to protect you from your, you know, we can get into it but I rather not, right? And charlatans are charlatans. They should be exposed as such. It's a vicious circle, it's a vicious circle, I agree. There's been research, research is on, it says a long time back but because of the war against drugs and the view on cannabis there's been a big hush-hush about it, yeah. The problem is that the data and researchers are not really brought up, yeah. They've been indoctrinated through our current, you want to call it an education system, what it's not education, it's indoctrination. I'd like to follow the medical research by Aubrey de Grey, Sun's Foundation. I don't know that there's research how to reverse the aging process, meaning age equals the amount of damage the body does to itself as a side effect of the metabolism. They try to repair this damage, put in like seven calories. Consume seven calories? Some of this aging stuff is funny. I think you can, we can definitely live much longer than we are if we aren't exposed to all the toxins in the world that are created due to our consumption or current political economic system. So I think we can reverse or not reverse but slow down the, if you want to call it the aging process. We already got CBD pills since many years back, yeah. Just because a plant has been used as a medicine for a long time doesn't mean it's good medicine. There are many plants with medicinal benefits but they tend to not be very strong. And Dante, maybe we don't need them to be very strong if they're a part of our diet, right? One of the problems with our current medical system with health in general in the western world anyway, it's not preventative, right? It's reactionary. And a lot of that is associated with food. Just imagine being able to eat certain types of food that have amazing benefits to the human body and if that is part of your diet then what that does or what tends to happen is you don't have serious malfunctions occurring, right? It's like if you're exercising your whole life then you're going to be more fit and you're going to be less prone to injury than someone who hasn't been exercising for a long time and then they get up and try to do a lot of exercise. They're going to hurt. They're going to do something that's going to hurt them. Like one of the things I learned and I have a friend, a good friend that was a physical fitness trainer and a lot of body weight stuff and what not, he said listen Chicho, go into the gym. The only thing you have to do really if you want to find out if someone has strength and has been training for a long time is if they can do chin-ups, right? And chin-ups are one of the hardest things that people do in the gym if they've never done it before, right? So a lot of people do a lot of weights and stuff like this and then they try to do a chin-up and then they pull a muscle. Something tears, right? There's people that have been doing chin-ups all their lives, they don't tear anything. So it's really a question of you know I'm sort of babbling on and ranting but if we had these foods in our diet then maybe we wouldn't have a lot of these illnesses, right? Chicho, yes, I agree on everything you have said so far. When I speak about the data I am simply referring to modern science applications in reference to what is currently known. I realize it has had a sample pool of humanity for an unknown but very long time, yeah. And one of the things was Nasim Nikolas Tala. That's one thing he brought in into the book, skin in the game and he referred to it in anti-fragile and stuff like this where he's basically saying the time that something has been in the system supersedes the scientific data that you might have acquired in a short period of time, right? So all that science is available if you go back and look at it or the evidence, look at it throughout time, right? I'm paraphrasing, I'm not saying it very well just because I want to rant right now but as you can tell this is dear to my heart, right? Very important. What's up Boomer? Am I Boomer? I'm actually on the lower side of the I'm not really a Boomer. Boomer is a little bit older than me. I'm a I don't know what I'm considered but what are these subcategories? I want to add the importance of cause and effect. If statistics gets handled in the wrong way it is not beneficial. If we did the right analysis or not it may lead to a false conclusion, yeah. Sorry for that. No, your English is fantastic Viper and I agree with you. Yeah, the data interpretation there's a few different places where science fails us. Huge, right? In the experiment process, right? One of them, the weak link is how you collect the data. The other one is how you interpret the data and the other one is how you present the data, right? In all those three locations you could have catastrophic failures. If you collect the wrong type of data this is all flawed. If you collect the right type of data, fantastic data you interpret it in properly, conclusions are flawed. If you collect the fantastic data, interpret it as best as you could. The best science allows you to do, right? And you don't present the information properly then it's useless, right? Many modern medicine is made from plants and built on plants. Yeah, most of it is I believe. Wow, did you ever smoke weed Mr. Jujo? Cannabis? Cannabis is part of a diet. In Canada it's legal. If a doctor would step out and say that cannabis, CBD is better treatment than the pills, he should be writing it. He should be writing out. Guess what happens? Sticks are running. In Canada now, doctors can prescribe cannabis before they prescribe any pharmaceutical pills and a lot of doctors are. Diet, have an effect on your health. 100%. If you're having ill health, chronic problems, look into your diet. Look into your stress level. That's the first place health should be considered. Modern medicine is not made from plants. It's true that they got the idea from plants or something that isolated the molecule from plant but they don't need to grow plants to make the medicine. They don't need it but they use the plant as the blueprint, Dante, right? Like as far as I know, huge percentage of pharmaceuticals are derivatives of what we found in the natural world. Penicillin isn't the isn't the mold on cheese and I don't know a lot of things from what I understand anyway. Slowing down the aging process is technically more difficult than reverse it, it seems. So reversing it is easier since so many things are going on in your body at the same time, all interacting with each other. That's why repairing the damage is easier. That's what I've heard. Oh okay, that's cool. So repairing the damage is easier than slowing it down. I asked you a question regarding your interest and fantasy. Dune was the reference you showed near the human. So I'm just going to read this. Dune was the reference you showed us in the return. Yeah, I remember. Yeah, that's right. Then you explained how it allows you a window to others' minds. They, how they dream in a sense which expands your own horizons. That concept gripped me and led me to ask a question that I had not realized prior. Exactly. How much of yourself is is us if we are impacted directly by thoughts of others we experience and do we have any actual control over ourself if exposure equals future? Merely human, I very much enjoy philosophy and its impact on our lives. So finding questions like these greatly interests me. Merely human, that's why I call our current education system indoctrination centers because they're implanting the beliefs, the concepts, what centralized institutions want our society to believe. Right? Or to understand or to follow or to incorporate into their lives. I think personally and many other people think as well very few of us really understand who we are because we are bombarded constantly by propaganda, by control mechanisms, by filters, by sensors. Right? It takes a tremendous amount of effort for a human being, for an individual to really figure out who they are. Really, it takes, it's emotionally taxing, financially taxing, socially taxing. Right? Just imagine being in a social setting all your life and all of a sudden you realize oh my god this is a cult. How are you going to find your way out of that? And what are you going to find when you come out? There's going to be a lot of other cults that are waiting for you to come out and if you've been wiping your programming in China and it's uh load on new programming into your mind there's a lot of people that want to load that fill in that space right? It's it's crazy personally I think. I'm really human to viper. Yes I agree with you. A consideration is that humanity as a whole can only have an output potential as great as their own capacity to understand and implement things properly. We are our own limitations and a fault in our own development. Stooges! The three stooges, how are you doing? Hey remember when those created the remember when those created an atom bomb and tested it and it created that huge lizard monster that ran amok in the city called Godzilla. Look, look, look, look how you do a three stooges, how is life? Sticks are met in the last couple of years. I'm talking 20 to 30 years back and regarding just that radiation Japan has been one of the philosophies is belief says Japan came up with all these Gazzaliz and all these mutant things because it was hit with atomic bombs and stuff like this right? So it became part of their culture history right? They had to deal with and there's a lot of, I've read some stuff regarding this, it's really cool right? But just as recent news there's been storms in Japan and a lot of radioactive waste was in garbage bags sitting in a place where all the sun floods came in and took all that radioactive waste radioactive plants and soil and now that stuff is in the ocean spread across coast of Japan and getting into the Pacific and getting into the food supply right? Are we going to go see Godzilla or are we just going to see cancer race go through the roof right? Just thought I'd share that with a little bit of news. Yes, I acknowledge that but that's not making it from plants that's isolating a molecule. Yeah and oh Dalte you're not going to like me as soon as I reply to you and since then also changing it chemically. That's why I saw let's say we get the basic idea from from a plant but then we refine it. Here's the kicker, Dalte. I'm old enough to know that I think it was beta carotene in broccoli right? Our scientific community came up with the consensus that the most beneficial ingredient in broccoli, chemical in broccoli was beta carotene right? So for a while in the 1980s or 90s a lot of people were buying a lot of beta carotene pills and eating beta carotene right? The kicker with our pharmaceutical industry is this it creates extremely potent stuff but it doesn't understand how all this nature is really nature is the is the ultimate testing ground for things right? Nature has created all these plants and foods and all the chemical compounds that interact with each other in a certain way that we as human beings do not yet understand not by a long shot like we we know very little about our digestive system we know about the heart when it comes to science not bad pretty good but our digestive system we know very little about because that's related to the foods that we consume. So for example the example I have is is it carrots that I beta carotene and broccoli anyway there's something in broccoli that they used to sell a lot of pills of right and then later on it came out it wasn't all it wasn't this the the other active ingredients in this they work together that was the benefits of it right? When it comes to science what we do as soon as we're commodifying science as soon as we're putting a price tag on experiments putting in laws to prevent people from conducting experiments and all this jazz the first thing the pharmaceutical companies want to do is create something that's not going to kill you that they don't really know the long-term side effects of right they just have to get a past in the US a past the FDA so they can sell it in pill format and they put it on on the assembly line right away and people consume that right but that thing that they extracted out of whatever plant that they've gotten synthesized who says that thing has all the benefits they tell us it does because we know it doesn't right because they've only been conducting experiments for five years ten years while some of these plants have been around for millennia right that have been in diets of tribal communities uh I question everything that comes out of pharmaceutical companies I don't believe that like I personally don't take my my multivitamins and all this crap I try to get my vitamins through food and because non-organic fruits and vegetables and food doesn't have as many vitamins minerals as or the organic stuff the stuff you can get locally then I try to stay as local and organic as possible when it comes to food I don't have much worries for our capacity to understand I have a problem with profit-centered uh mentalities yeah for profit everything is possible nowadays as far as I can as far as I learned yeah the comb comb jelly is the big thing in medicine since it can recreate tissue and their brains imagine solving the question on how they do it and how we can recreate it yeah I've heard about the jellyfish stuff right that lives like a thousand plus years and you can live forever really for one understand but it's not going to be forever but st. just Germany Dante I'm just going to read Dante's because I just went on a rant on Dante well pre-industrial societies have a life expectancy of less than 40 so all their natural plans don't help the money um so Dante did they really have a life expectancy of less than 40 okay and was that calculation because it was was basically infant mortality was extremely high but as soon as you went past the infant phase right as soon as you were past like six years old or I forget what the number is right four years old six years old less than 10 as soon as you lived past that period then let your life expectancy was into the 70s 80s some people say life expectancy in the past was a lot higher than now as long as you made it past your infancy right so I personally don't agree with life expectancy in the past was left in 40 years that's taking all of human population right infants died at a higher rate yes I'm pretty sure that's not disputed right but as soon as you go past that infant phase your life expectancy was pretty high so all their natural yeah um I disagree I disagree health because you can't just take natural plants into consideration just by themselves right you have to take their lifestyles into consideration they lived healthier there's no way was 80 it might have been 60 after every child we have to look at the numbers Dante I know I looked at this way way like 20 years ago I looked at some of this stuff right I was blown away by the data right I was blown away by the data like and you have to consider where you live like life expectancy in Afghanistan for males was 67 or 47 or something at some point life expectancy in the Lakota nation I believe in uh hill what was it called on the black I think was black rock for males was 46 right so you have to also consider where you're looking at let's go back read some of the other stuff uh st. just germany I think we have we have a free will aspect in us the border between me and you is maybe arbitrary in a way because we are interconnected in many ways and our control over ourselves depends on awareness etc but I believe we have some control over ourselves directed to mirror human I believe so too but I think in our present civilization we need catalyst we need something to purge our programming viper mirror human to viper you should not fear profit profit is in essence an exchange of energy conservation of energy is a no law of the world and nature the issue more is more about who gains that energy and how they choose to use it to impact the world around them in my humble opinion well said mirror human and we should define what profit is if we're talking about fiat currency profit then there's more problematic if we define profit as a good will improvement of our communities 100% mirror human I agree with you so profit what are we profiting in it makes me consider ubi universal based on as a real potential answer it would distribute the energy to the largest possible pool and allow for rapid growth for from people in fields we have never considered by simple exposure of power to them mirror human the problem with universal basic income the one I have and I put out a video on this is the centralization aspect of it our current economic political system is corrupt to the core right no matter what type of system we put into place if it's centralizing more power it's going to be corrupted we need to decentralize and we're seeing that right now really the decentralization happening in our world right now is huge there's a lot of centralization happening within legacy systems where they're doing lots of mergers and acquisitions and consuming each other but there's in the background there's a lot of decentralization taking place a lot of decentralization taking place and again i'll put this out there if you have math questions we can do math right but i guess this is uh definitely not the turn out to be a mastery also since i'm just going to read dantes also since when when do infinite that's not matter they do matter don't they i'm not saying they don't matter the pain point still stands they didn't have know how to treat their diseases i would agree with that and they didn't know how to treat their all their diseases that we're getting however they lived healthier lives their immune system which was much stronger so they got less diseases we have more diseases now much more diseases now if you don't include the plagues that came about and a lot of the plagues were because of human behavior right with the black death being associated with you know ticks from rats or whatever it was right it's about infection don't it because many babies children die we are good with infection infection treatments nowadays but not with disease of old age yeah but life from what i've seen one of the issues we have in our society the quality of life is diminishing dramatically across the board in our societies because of diseases illnesses both mental and physical and spiritual i guess that our current civilization is bringing about right all you all you have to do is look at some of the some of the elders in our society a huge chunk of them are living in crazy pain infantastic that statistic needle to lower number again cause and effect cause and effect sages Germany merely human to sages turn unfortunately and likely beyond the scope of twitch chat space i disagree that free will is real simply because we have a sense of control of our lives it is very easy to confuse our perception with what is real existential questions of ontology are likely simply simply too much to be had here though possibly merely one but again this is through education and indoctrination social engineering centralized power has been social engineering our societies for decades now decades now it's not centuries right are we breaking out of that decentralization fake news sticks on do you like solve so yeah i do i go through periods where i just go off on sudoku for for a while i've been this i don't know five or six times in my life for a few months i play sudoku is very meditative relaxing and then i move on right and i like playing the easy ones are ridiculously easy the medium ones are pretty easy i like doing the hard ones and i get i get stuck every now and then right and i do them with pencil pen and paper and pencil and i grab those you know sudoku books or booklets and stuff like this or i do them online i print them off online and do them i like sudoku sudoku is super fun that's fair i just like to acknowledge the huge service that chemistry and medicine has done for oh huge don't i agree with you there i'm not saying we are living healthy lives yeah i agree with you don't the scientific community we we know so much more about the world now than we did in the past on in regards to chemistry medicine and stuff like this but i think we've lost a tremendous amount of information regarding the natural world how we're interconnected with nature right that part i think has been detrimental for our civil for humanity not just our civilization but for humanity no matter how much people pretend cannabis is not a cure all no but it is in large part preventative in many ways right that has been shown in literally thousands of blinded and controlled experiments but have fun with your placebo yes um Dante cannabis is not a cure for all however it uh it improves lifestyle for many people who are suffering tremendously maybe through chronic pain maybe through again nausea appetite whatever it might be rack i would like to acknowledge everything uh they've held away from us because of profit and other ideas yeah how many years is a decade ten years a decade is ten years centuries a thousand millennia is oh sorry centuries a hundred millennia is a thousand as far as i remember after finding out uh importance of hygiene in operation rooms and hospitals death in birth rates fell down fell down in an increasing rate it also changed the statistic of life expectancy expectancy thanks viper and that's one of the things lot of the scientific the consensus scientific community the first person that came out and said oh the reason that people are dying when we're doing surgery on them is because we have these invisible things in our hands that are getting inside the open body they're causing infections so people are dying the scientific community shunned the person i forget who this person was that stated this they threw them out right they might have put them in insane asylum or something right and then later on it came out the scientific community was totally wrong right and this one person was hundred percent correct that surgeons should have been washing their hands before they did surgery right so right now if we take that and that's just one example there's been countless examples throughout human history where the scientific consensus has been wrong and they persecuted people that question the scientific consensus right and if we extrapolate to the present right now we should be questioning everything that comes out from the scientific consensus right all scientists or majority scientists agree that this is the case and then there's a few people that come on says no you know what maybe not right and then everyone says oh those guys are crazy well maybe the guys were questioning the consensus are the right right we have to listen right we don't have to believe we don't have to say that the scientific consensus is wrong every time but we have to have a platform for people to talk and express their ideas and their beliefs and the data that they have right now what we're saying when science is the scientific community or the mass media is quashing is preventing anyone that questions the status quo as far as i remember after finding out importance by hygiene i don't pretend that it's the cure of everything or even half of the things i'm just pointing out the medicinal benefits of it yeah yeah i was thinking about the same guy the hygiene person yeah the surgeon guy yeah that blows me away like really that blows me away and guys again i got my i have a bachelor's science right some of the some of the people i encountered in the scientific community when i was going to university and after university and i wouldn't hire them to take take out my garbage let alone collect data process data interpret data accurately there's a lot of a lot of scammers in there right sadly historically and how we learn is determined by the victor not necessarily by the actual facts i agree that it would be great to live in a world that listens to all parties involved yeah merely human dialogue like that would be amazing in a group there should always be one guy the last one that questions the rest if they all agree on something just in case they might be wrong sticks armada this is something that mosad i believe the philosophy of mosad i believe they have 13 people i don't know what the numbers are going by memory right and mosad is the israeli secret service right and powerful institution and they do a lot right they're like really and one of the reasons are powerful i i saw this in an interview in a documentary where one of the top mosad top people i don't know what you call them was being interviewed and he said basically that the the mindset of the mosad is this that if everyone agrees there has to be one person that totally questions everything that the consensus is right and many times that one question one person that questions what the consensus is ends up being true statistically anyway right so i 100% agree with this just in case they might be wrong sain't just germany to merely human so so on what is the concept of no free will based isn't the kind of perception observation i perceive that i live is that perception wrong i perceive a world doesn't that mean there's at least a simulation meaning there's also a real world since the simulation simulates something that's a that's a loop loop the loop sain't just germany i'm going to read that again so on what is the concept of no free world based so on what is the concept of no free world based indoctrination right if you're able to think outside the box isn't the kind of perception observation yeah social construct i believe that i live is that perception wrong not on a fundamental level you live but how do you live what are your beliefs living is not a belief living is life i think therefore i am is that the thing i perceive a world now that's different you don't perceive that you live you do live unless we're talking about like you're saying in the last sentence simulation are we living in a simulation right now some people say yes i don't think so unless you we mean by occupying a physical body is a simulation occupying matter and being able to animate this matter animal animate this matter is a simulation maybe right what kind of math do you tutor a high school math elementary school and high school and a little bit of college and university atomic shoelace thank you for the sub by the way i think or follow by the way follower sub by the way if i don't catch it thank you for the follows and subs i hear the humans say just germany physics actually in my mind at least consider the world around you is functioning under laws and mechanisms those are restrictive and you have no option to step outside of them yeah and even one thing i would say is physics is not laws it's approximations we call them laws newtons laws right but newtons newtons laws aren't laws there are approximations so a lot of physics is just approximations it's models there could be a better model that we could implement and by the way i'll say this again if you have any math questions or whatnot let us know i'm just making myself available for a couple hours if you have any if you require any math help i'm here to help you out if you if i can anyway aside from that this open discussion and i love the scientific aspect of the politics and stuff well we talked a little bit politics but it was a science related we do during current event streams physics is not the best source you weren't there when we talked about it i believe it was a talk about truth of reasons versus truth of facts physics is about truth of facts truth is about truth of facts truth of facts you can't state as really truth yeah they can be falsified any moment yeah yeah i agree with sages germany physics has tremendous amount of assumptions associated with it chemistry biology in all sciences the first thing you do is you state your assumptions these are my assumptions based on my assumptions here's the data we collected here's how we interpreted here's our interpretation models thank you for correcting that functioning laws models yeah and they are not they're very accurate models i mean really look at all the things we've done with our models with physics chemistry biology all the other sciences right i wish i went to a tutor from my physics class in uni i did enjoy i did enjoy the lab experiments but i didn't do so well on the exams yeah yeah the university there's a way better way to provide education to our societies way better way to provide education to our societies right like we do a brutal job at it like incredible brutal really it's and it's getting worse like just to let you guys know that my experience with our current education system and i've been doing this for like 20 years or so right it's falling off a cliff in regards to mathematics it's falling off a cliff where we're going with this i don't know really the the misinformation the lack of education the lack of information the how unprepared kids are right now in my part of the world coming out of high school for for the world for them to be able to function to the best of their abilities in the world is ridiculous right you're doing a part of that better way right here it is sustainable functional and reaches a massive audience that choose to accept it your method of teaching is quite good uh quite good here thanks merely human right you know what it's to a certain degree it's it's my it's multifaceted right it's my passion i love this okay it's my business model right i'm trying to roll this out so it will sustain me i can do this until the end of my days and it's also extremely selfish because i want to improve our societies i want to improve our communities right i'm getting tired of more power going to centralized institutions because people aren't educated well enough they're not they don't have the tools that they're disposal to take care of themselves so they're looking up to authority and higher power to take care of themselves in their communities right and that's by design as far as i see it centralized power has destroyed our education system has co-opted hijacked our communities so it can acquire more power i'm trying to at least do my part to reverse that okay trying and it's working right it's slow mo but slow mo is okay it's manageable for me is it odd how hard you have to work in order to just be a productive member of society going through school uni internship etc without a guarantee of employment or even self-purpose very odd but it's by design by centralized power they've made life extremely difficult in our world right that's because if we're barely making ends meet and trying to stay healthy and trying to take care of our families then we don't have time to question their power their atrocities right so first thing we have to do is don't believe their BS the second thing we have to do in in association with not believing them questioning everything they have to say not buying into their garbage at the same time we also have to build our communities and educate our kids and educate ourselves and arm ourselves with knowledge and power and live as healthy lives as possible physics seems really interesting i would take it if i was smart enough but i think it's too demanding for my capacity all of i disagree really i disagree i think everybody has the ability to do physics you just have to change your lifestyle to a certain degree and consume less crap and consume more serious content right it may mean you have to relearn mathematics okay it may mean that you just have to do a little bit of research into physics and think about what it is that you want to focus on right one of the things you can do the easiest place to start with physics is this is kinematics in my opinion all right merely human to all of i can offer you a piece of advice right now correct that speaking about yourself your future self would appreciate it you can succeed you are not what you think you are you can reach beyond your current self merely human i like you 100 100 i am not smart is a wording you should change today i am smart enough and i will prove it yeah 100 i agree with merely human stop stop saying math is hard physics is hard because it's not that's a social construct centralized power hijacking education and can try to tell people that mathematics is hard or physics is hard you would be amazed at how many students have worked with where their parents turned to me and after i work with the kids for a little bit right i turn to the parents say why is your kid failing we're not doing well and their reply is this most parents many parents right they turn to me they go i don't know they used to love mathematics when they were younger and then they hated it now did the kids all of a sudden at some point when puberty hits they go i hate mathematics hell no the reason they hate it is because our centralized education system is so horrendous right it takes the love out of humanity right it takes this thing that merely human says i am smart i will prove it i want to know right it takes that out of kids right seriously you can do whatever you want to do you just have to decide for yourself is sacrifice worth it is it going to be uh is it going to make me happy am i going to love doing this well i put the time required to do this and then figure out what you need to learn before well the first place you need to start anyway try to have fun with it if you hook yourself to it somehow your confidence level will rise and you will do better agree to agree to agree thanks merely human i will give it a try cool i quote something i read okay same just germany so quote science science conclusively proved that light is a wave phenomenon and definitely not a particle phenomenon but now claims that light is both particle and wave so how can anyone take scientific proof seriously except in a strictly professional sense merely human uh this is a uh polemic quote i admit i don't know what polemic means uh but it has some truth in it in my view since what is certain today may be far off in a hundred years saint just germany this i agree with 100 the scientific facts we have right now maybe complete fallacies in the future right and scientific fallacies we have right now may become fact in the future just remember there was a lot of doctors promoting people for smoking cigarettes right they said oh it doesn't harm you what what we talk science i guess this is a little bit of a i meant that teacher teacher 100 right man system and teachers wrecks the curiosity of the students uh i would say system i wouldn't say teacher there are a lot of teachers that are trying their best just it's just a system grinds them down and they're just they get destroyed right once they stay within the system there are there are a lot of teachers that are horrendous as well right i'm not going to justify it i i deal with their byproduct on a daily basis right trying to bring the love of learning back into kids trying to teach them mathematics trying to tell them that they're smart they can do whatever they want right because a lot of kids that i work with if they're struggling they do they say the same thing that all of it i can't do it is too hard and my first thing is call things down for them and get their self-confidence back up right um it's the institutions it's the centralized institutions it's the lack of opportunity nearly humans think just germany because although it expands and is proven and disproved it is still the best model of thought we have available what we know today can very well be wrong very soon this does not mean we should discard it it means we should search further into it 100% agree and try to find alternative ways of being alternative ways of thinking the problem is the centralized institutions pass laws prohibiting ways of being ways of thought ways of looking at the world some of them at least yeah vipers agree yeah some some and that's you know you're gonna get that in any field what you speak becomes what you believe what you believe becomes your reality ask any successful person and they will tell you the same assuming they are speaking honestly and want you to grow merely human i agree i agree live the way you want to live right treat others well uh don't put yourself down be positive really appreciate that you can improve your life you can improve your community you can make a difference you can learn anything you want to learn you just have to figure out what it is that or how it is that you want to interact with this world for even just now for a short period of time or for extended period of time or for a lifetime and nothing really lasts forever right people go through multiple career life changes throughout their lives right just be willing to accept change right because change as the same goes the only absolute in life is change right that's all and we are brilliant creatures really we are hard we we can we adapt right we're resilient we just have to take ownership on our own of our own lives be responsible for our own lives right we have to hold ourselves accountable for our own actions for our own situation curiosity may kill the cat but i am sure it teached it so many lessons yeah or curiosity might have killed this cat but all the other cats watching went okay don't do that right curiosity killed the cat cats are resilient really cats are crazy resilient they're very cuddly too some of them anyway some of them how we do it for time man we barely did any mathematics right i think when i upload this on bit shoot and youtube i'm gonna talk i'm gonna call this talking philosophy what should we call this you guys have been here what should we call this video when we load it on bit shoot and youtube sometimes i have a seriously hard time deciding on what i'm gonna call things and i try to watch the whole thing and put timestamps in there i don't even know how would put timestamps into this video merely human i hear you and i agree but it's really damn hard to put into practice i do try though so thanks for the advice yeah and all of it's not supposed to be easy really since childhood we grew up in the society which is bombarding us like we're not talking about you know random bombardment we're talking about methodical calculated bombardment by corporations and centralized power to program us in a way to accept their authority as we get older right if you watch the documentary called a corporation there's a part in there where they're interviewing a CEO of a company i forget who it is that sells products to teenage girls right and in the interview the CEO says listen we don't want to focus a huge chunk of our advertising advertising to teenage girls we're spending a ton of advertising money to adolescent girls right girls that are in that are five six seven years old they start producing advertisements programming for girls that age even though they have no products to sell to girls that age because in the next few years they program onto a level when they reach tweens 11 12 13 they've been indoctrinated to consume their product that's what we're under the pressure that we're under in our current civilization in our current societies and that's just one right they do this for everyone okay we have to really appreciate what that means and rewrite our programming that takes hard work so hard so hard so hard but man is it worth it some of this some of that may be the title some of this is some of that a philosophical live stream some of this some of that is that what should we call it wiper i'm gonna send this some of this some of that some of this some of that i'm gonna write this out i'm gonna send myself a little note okay and the benefits of cannabis that's what we're gonna call it open discussion on the benefits of cannabis okay some of this some of that here let's do this i'm gonna write this out so i don't forget open saw saw fickle this gush and some of this some of that and fits cannabis at least that's what we're going to call it on bitch it on youtube we'll probably leave out and the benefits of cannabis okay just because we've been getting by the way we've been getting killed with the youtube algorithm okay like i know that notifications aren't going out to people i guess we did some stuff that youtube's algorithm did not like right so been getting killed with youtube analytics unfortunate but that's one of the reasons i've been decentralizing right the mess model of thought there are many candidates i believe physics is one but maybe mathematics and thinking reasoning is a better one i don't know but i like the concept of truth truth of reason greater than truth of fact you like truth of reason greater than truth of fact okay cool are the facts based on reasons what are the facts that's the kicker right what are facts i like the concept also when i spoke about free will it is not it is not because it is it's it is a pleasant thought but my honest opinion currently i am not in disagreement with you though just a slightly variant perspective yeah i think we would all agree that we have a lot of things wrong in our current societies like so much wrong going on right now and we're all working towards improving that how we go about it i think is really personal because there isn't one road one path to the answer we could get there through multiple paths to the solutions it is better to exclude the cannabis from youtube title i think so i think so i'm going to start really filtering myself from youtube censoring myself from youtube we'll see where we go with this i'm just doing my first set of what do you call it getting back into the editing stuff so i might go back to just maybe loading on mainly primary primarily just the edited videos on there and the live streams on youtube we'll see where it goes right facts equals all swans are white you could observe a black swan one day though reason equals analytic conclusions like every bachelor is unmarried okay so basically the black swans the extremes in the data set you don't consider to be part of the fact a factoid all swans are white you could observe a black swan one day though okay no you do put the disclaimer you could observe a black swan one day okay and reason equals analytic conclusions like every bachelor is unmarried but is is every bachelor unmarried saint just germany by definition but some people we know this is a fact say i'm a bachelor if they're trying to pick up someone have some extracurricular activities but they're not bachelors so they're misusing the word bachelor right isn't that my picking uh what do you call it my apologies for not staying on subject i did attempt earlier to gracefully back out of the philosophy conversation i also did not have any math questions i come to learn from what your uh coro copia of stream of a stream is usually i did not mean no i'm merely human it's not disrespect no one came up how are you doing like there was no math questions we set it out there uh which is fine that's okay like seriously merely human just so you know when i with my students when we set up sessions where we're planning on doing mathematics in general we're trying to do mathematics right but there are many cases where i get together with students where we're not talking about mathematics we're talking about the questions that they have about life right so i'm not there my main focus is to teach them mathematics because i believe mathematics is going to make their lives a lot easier but there are times where my students have other thoughts in their minds and they can't focus on the mathematics and when i encounter those situations uh i talk to talk with them about whatever they want to talk about okay so this is an absolute odd make how are you doing wait what's going on here isn't this a mastery hey chichou how are you doing it was supposed to be a mastery but we ended up just talking philosophy and science and medicine and stuff like that so it's super cool by the way odd make i am four episodes in into stein gate fantastic john titter yes thank you for the recommendation i'm pretty sure you're you recommended it to me right and just so you know when john titter was doing his thing right was was it a group of people was it just a troll job it was just a troll wasn't just a troll job it was there was more to it right i was reading that stuff in real time when it was being posted okay so stein's gate i'm really appreciating because it takes me back to that period and by the way with uh john titter stuff with stein's gate brings it up where i i forget when the last one last time was every 10 years ago or something like that i went back trying to find his whole posts on the forums that he posted and there was stuff missing right so i'm really appreciating stein's gate thanks for the recommendation fantastic loving it loving it st just Germany i put it in another way truth of reason equals those prior to experience platonic we might say priori and truth of fact those dependent on experience so let's check that those prior to experience so reason is truth of reason equals those prior to experience truth of facts those dependent on experience or statolian we might say i gotta read that again that's that to me is truth of reason equals those prior to experience truth of fact those dependent on experience okay possibly that's an interesting way of thinking about it hannah graphing cubic root functions when they aren't they aren't exponent you got to do um let's do you got to do i'm pretty great at anime recommendation awesome on me i appreciated it hannah you got to do synthetic division right it's not my theory it's uh libins is it i don't know libins philosophy is cool though a lot of philosophy is indistinguishable for math yeah this might be off topic but does hard work mean anything in life yeah or is life just all luck no but luck plays a part in it luck can throw you any which way that's life right both with the goal of being successful no luck has a part to play in it but hard work does mean does mean a lot as the same goes you make your own luck it's not a hundred percent true you know like luck luck can smack you by the side of the head good and bad but lucky that you're live now i want to watch one of your youtube videos but figure that check a check twitch first cheers to show a bit of fan for the last few years awesome son of son of a gore son of a gore glad to check that stream i'm going to be loading by the way yesterday i loaded on math how to count tomorrow i'm loading on how to add how to teach adding two days later i'm loading on how to teach multiplying and then two days after that i'm loading on the whole thing all in one video libsnik i think you have his face on your calculus book if i remember oh do i is that him cool i sometimes feel like this book was the last real polymath really and i love the word polymath that's what they say i believe is it i gotta look into this then uh factoring factoring cubics graphing cubics graphing graphing cubics take a look at this here's here's one thing you have to appreciate when you're graphing polynomials right there's four things that can happen if you have a function that has a positive coefficient in front of the highest degree highest power and the power is even then the function opens up like this goes like this if you have a function that is a negative coefficient in front and an even power the function opens down if you have a function that has a positive coefficient in front and an odd power the function opens up like this it goes like this and if you have a function that is a negative coefficient in front with an odd power the function opens up like this so this would be x to the power of one two three four five this would be x to the power of three this would be x to the power of one to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. This would be x to the power of 1, 2, 3, 4. So the curves, the amount of curves, sort of tell you what type of function you have, what degree. So if you get a function that is a Q, let's say xQ plus 5x squared plus 3x plus 1. To be able to factor this, you do something called synthetic division. And we've got a whole bunch of stuff on there. Just do chicho synthetic division. It's series 3B of the language of mathematics that we put out. So you take the coefficient up front here, 1, 5, 3, 1. And you try out different factors. Possible factors of this divided by this. Right now it's just plus or minus 1. So we're going to go x is equal to 1. It's not going to work. We're going to x is equal to negative 1. Is that going to work? I don't think so, but we'll try it out anyway. That means x plus 1 is a factor. So you bring this guy down, multiply by this, that's negative 1. Add those guys, you get 4. Multiply it by negative 1. You get negative 4. Add them together, you get negative 1. Multiply it by negative 1, you get 1. And it doesn't factor. If we change this to a negative, negative 1, that's a negative 1. Then multiply by negative 1. Whatever's here becomes positive 1. You add them, you get 0. We factored it, right? So the factor of this, f of x, is going to be x plus 1 times you reduced it by 1 degree. This becomes x squared plus 4x minus 1. And you can factor this guy using the quadratic formula. This process is a long process. I put out a whole bunch of videos for factoring polynomials, anything of cubic function or higher degree. That's the way you go about it. That's the speedy Gonzales version of it. And what these guys are, this is x is equal to negative 1, so that's one of the x intercept. This was a positive coefficient and an odd power, so it follows this mindset. So we know that the function does this. We don't know if it's going like this, or here's negative 1 again, going like this. We don't know that yet, because we haven't factored this guy out and we haven't plugged in any numbers here to see what the y value is. So as soon as you find that, you can go find f of 1, or f of 2. So find out what f of x is when x is 2. You plug it in here. 2 cubed is 8. Here, let's do this here. 2 cubed is 8. 2 squared is 4. Times 5 is 20. 3 times 2 is 6 plus 6 minus 1. So that's 28. 30, 28, 34 minus 1, 33. So when x is 2, y is 33. x is 2, y is 33. So we're probably up here. Something like that. Sorry Hannah, if we had longer, we'd go through it more, but that's a quick way. But I've done a lot of these. Chico Synthetic Division. You'll find 8 videos on it. Neuron was really just a discount in the bends. I don't know these philosophers. I didn't know this factorization. That is mind blowing. Thanks man. My pleasure Viper. Although we lack free will, in the sense most understand it, as in my opinion, I feel that hard work and the choices we make alter our boundaries with high probability, which impacts our choices and being. Shorter answer, yes. Without question, hard work has a point. 100% hard work has a point. The three stuages, Chico, I ain't no Speedy Gonzales. I'm more like his cousin, slow poke, Roger, yes. Was that his name? He did have a cousin that was really slow and he was like, hey, how's it going? I love that cartoon. Speedy Gonzales was phenomenal. I don't know if it's PC anymore. I don't even know if they show it anymore. He did. He was a tall guy. He was tall and he was, was he the chubby one or the tall one? I can't remember, man. But I love the saying. Puff of smoke comes back. So fun, so fun. Well, we did some math. Yay. I think we're going to call it a stream gang. If you're into politics tomorrow, tomorrow from 11 a.m., we're going to talk about current events and stuff. Odnick. So you know how there are cubed functions, quadratic functions, etc. and formulas like quadratic equation. Well, there's no quintic formula to solve polynomial sort of fifth power because of a mathematician named Galois. Really? Is that true, Odnick? Why? So he proved that you couldn't come up with a formula for quintic to the power of five? Big sombrero on a small mouth. I like that cartoon also. Yeah. I didn't know that, and I don't know any of the other formulas for, I don't even know the formula for the cubic or quartic or anything. Right? I just know the quadratic and then you just use synthetic division to factor all the rest of the polynomials. Galois was age 19 when he discovered, developed Galois theory. He died in a duel the day after he wrote it down. Oh, Rambo 85. How are you doing? Oh, that's unfortunate. That brings down the life expectancy model. I remember the Roadrunner and the Coyotes tactics cartoons was awesome. Cartoons was awesome. It was awesome. Less judgmental than it is now, less propaganda as it is now, less PC as it is now. Life lesson. Don't do math and duel. Life lesson. Don't do math and duel. The duel was after a girl. What a real romantic. I think it was like right before the French Revolution. Oh, no. Oh, that's just, that's ridiculous. Losing your life in a duel after a girl. How about just, you know, if the girl wants you, you guys just grab each other's hands and grab your belongings and skip town and go to another country. Wouldn't that be more romantic than dying in a duel? Doing good Rambo. Doing good. Enjoying life. Enjoying life. Lebez wasn't just a philosopher. He also developed calculus, like integral notation with Newton. Man, I've been, my, my history of mathematics is horrendous. I always saw Newton was the main person that came up with calculus. I didn't, I didn't realize it was Lebez and I didn't know he was the face of the math book that I, that I cherish. I gotta look into this guy. I'm pretty sure I looked at him before, but I forget, right? It's crazy. Okay gang, I hope you have a fantastic Friday. I hope you have a fantastic weekend. If you can make it tomorrow, I'll see you guys tomorrow during current, current stream. I'm happy you like Stinesgate though. It really, really picks up after episodes. Okay, cool. I'm looking forward to this fantastic weekend. I miss you terribly. I'm here, brother. I'm here. Our sister, of course, right? I'm here. I'll be around. And then I'll announce the live streams most likely next weekend or something. Thanks for your stream, Chichou. And thanks for the talk. I'm merely human in chat. Yeah, thank you everyone for participating. Thank you for the suggestions. Thank you for the recommendations. Thank you for everything. And it's awesome. We had no trolls today. Yeah, right on. They saw math and they ran. Okay, everyone, hope you have a fantastic weekend. We'll talk later. Bye for now.