 If you are articating over commercial disputes even though the law says so here, there is also need to have aptitude, some aptitude to understand commercial transactions, to understand a bit of numbers, so we can deliver fair judgments. Don't misunderstand me. I'm not saying you're not delivering good judgment, but it's just a six. Entrepreneurship skill of some kind. And it doesn't have to be imposed on you when you're a judge. I think you heard me last time I was delivering somewhere at some platform. I said let's change our curricula as a country so that at an early stage our children pick up financial literacy skills, they pick up entrepreneurship skills as they become lawyers, they become administrators, educationists. They have that basic understanding. It does help. So we support you in that area to make sure that you're continuing education skills development with your mundane legal issues can include some elements of this, including IDESI IT. I think you touched on it yourself. The automation that is essential which will bring efficiencies. So your training center idea, establishment of the training center, you have our full support. Let's just talk what we need to do as central government to support that. And you have support from us including this fellow talking here. And this fellow will do what he can to make that training square reality. I think it's a shared vision. So Chief Justice, we support better conditions of service for the judicial. We support that. I noticed that the biggest and longest club came from that subject. So we support that wholeheartedly, wholeheartedly. Because that will assist in improving the morale. You well articulated that because the judges may not be able to do other things to enhance their income. So well taken, point well taken. I want to attrest that by saying that does not negate and I picked a few whispers, negate the importance of the overall need for prudence in the utilization of public resources. It doesn't negate that. The two are not contradictory. If we save money from corruption, it means we will have it available to support the improvement of conditions of service in the judiciary. That's the story. And it is important that the judiciary understands the importance of prudence overall. If the president doesn't want to ride in a latest Gulfstream 650, which costs the taxpayer $193 million, the judiciary as citizens needs to understand why we do not support that extravagance. Because we could have gotten a plan of capability in terms of range reliability around $20 million. So why did we have to spend $193 million? On that piece of metal, we could have looked after the judiciary in the same ticket. We could have also bought a lot of school desks for the kids. We could have also invested in one or two border posts as Kazungula border posts is now delivering value. I hope the Kazungula council chair person is here and the MP is here. We spent around $240 million on that bridge. That's across the river. 900 meters of the bridge, 900, close to a kilometer. And before we spent that money on that bridge, cheap justice, the river knew we were getting around there was very little. Since we invested in that bridge, we are now earning so much money, including now being able to get the payback from that money within 2 to 3 years. Complete payback. This government wants to invest money prudently and not waste it in certain areas of expenditure. We expect and we know we have the support of the judiciary as the legislature should support us. Because after all we have triplets. No, triplets. Yes. Three is what? After all we have triplets. Legislature, judiciary, executive. So these are things that are important to this government so that we can take care of the needs of the judiciary in terms of conditions of service. But we shouldn't go and spend money like that. It doesn't mean we should not improve the conditions of service of the judiciary. We should not provide vehicles. We should. But the question is that why should we buy a plane for one person and is small in tourist at $193 million. That's why I refuse to use that plane and we'll be selling it. We're just going through the procedures now. It's gone. We can recover what the eye sees, some loss. It's not a loss because the money was never spent on the plane. The money was siphoned out in the process. The plane was just an opportunity to siphon money. The issue of corruption. That's the issue. But when we do so we should be able, if we want to replace it with the proper plane that does the same work, similar work. But not spending that much. And the residue we can spend in two, three other border posts. That's the point I wanted to make. And we can recover the full $193 million with the replacement plane but also two border posts in two to three years. The fourth year will be in profit. That's how this government operates and that's the mind frame. We wanted to share that. We agree you have a backlog of vehicles. We agree office space. We're in agreement. We're in agreement. We're in agreement that you need facilities. We need, actually you don't need, we together need those facilities. It's good that you spoke before me so we're going to have this conversation. It's good. So count on us on the office space. We heard you loud and clear and my team will get a couple of your speech so that it's our input into the work that we should be doing together. Straight forward, isn't it? Straight forward. We also know that the minister of justice is part of the executive. The judiciary is one of the triplets. So we understand that. We think there's a legal issue there how the judicial was administered through the minister of justice. We understand. So I think part of the issue is not to break that but part of the issue is to now create the judicial leadership and the executive must also have regular direct contacts to discuss these things. So which means the chief justice and the president must be talking regularly and comparing them. And that's fine. Then we'll be in a position to tick off, some of the things we raise are mandate. We'll be able to tick off those things and guide each other. Isn't it? And then drop it to administrators, the bureaucrats whom we are tackling every day, chief justice, tackling every day to get things done. So I think you'll be pleased to learn that we are very happy with your speech. We are very happy with the issues that concern the judiciary. We would like to work together within the confines of a treasury envelope that was depleted, which we inherited. Our efforts to rebuild the economy is meant to support the judiciary as well. So it's a self-saving agenda for all of us. And therein lies the issue of teamwork. Bamuami. Judiciary does not exist in isolation. Executive does not exist in isolation. Legislature does not exist in isolation. If they keep on making laws that are creating trouble for you to make judgements when you have cases before you, we must talk to each other and address those issues. Because otherwise the citizens who think the judiciary is inefficient and are issuing contradictory rulings, citizens are watching. And maybe the contradictory rulings are arising from conflicting legislation coming from the legislation. So we the executive are interested to make sure that as the legislature we work as a team. That's my message. If you want to take home message among some, this is one of them. But don't forget to take home on economic reconstruction. Because that will fund what we want. Chief Justice, it is important, dear delegates, and I want to speak to more than the delegates from Zambia, delegates from our neighboring countries, our saddick region, our beloved Africa, and the world. That it's important to note that we the three arms of government, executive, legislature, judiciary work for the people of Zambia. The people that we work for are the people of Zambia. Even as a judge sits to write a judgment, remember you work for the people of Zambia. We are not above the people. We are a creation of the people. The constitution is a creation of the people. Therefore we are subservient to the people of Zambia. All of us without exception. Another take home. Having said that, so I don't convolute the discussion and pollute it, but help to make it clear. So in totality we support the judiciary. We support you. And today we will sit here. We're not rushing out ministers. We will sit here to witness our honorable chief justice as he launches in his launch of the vision for the judiciary. Focusing on building public confidence through enhanced judicial accountability and increased access to justice. We will sit in here and listen to you present. We look forward to your new vision, our chief justice. We look forward to your new vision for an independent and truly indispensable, this indispensable arm of government. This one of the members of the three twins. No, three triplets. Triplets. One of the three triplets. One of the triplets, three triplets. So we look forward beyond your presentation of the vision to walking the talk, to seeing an improvement in the judiciary, to helping society reduce the fights. When a matter is not decided quickly, chief justice, and litigants are looming out there, they end up killing each other sometimes. So we could protect them from deaths by walking the talk, dispensing justice fairly equitably timely. I think it's the right point for me to end this same, very pleased to have this honor to declare the 2022 judicial conference officially open. May God bless you, you our chief justice, you in the judiciary, all of you, and guide you in your work as you serve our dear citizens. I thank you for your kind attention.