 Anyone have any questions in the back? Well as mentioned I'm an emergency physician, which means I do shift work And I generally work in small primarily worked in smaller areas So in the middle of the night come two three in the morning often my emergency department will be dead Nobody there, and I was sort of looking online And I came across this page in Wikipedia that was really quite bad And then I noticed I could fix it and I sort of got hooked At that point and you know, it's a I've found that it's a great way to get involved with academics Even if you're out in the middle of nowhere So that that's the draw to me, you know, we have an academic community There's a core group of physicians on Wikipedia who are interested in you know going over the academic research and interested in writing academic articles So I have a community there of academics when I'm you know 4,000 kilometers from UBC or whatever it is Yes You know the we're hoping people are learning more about Wikipedia as time comes time goes on, you know Wikipedia is not a suitable source to you know to reference in academic papers It's a starting point It's where you get an overview of the topic, you know, we at Wikipedia wouldn't reference ourselves You know you need to reference, you know, you need to reference the published peer-reviewed literature so You know People who've gotten into trouble are the ones who have used Wikipedia inappropriately, you know You have the odd journalist who you know find something on Wikipedia Copy and paste it uses it verbatim doesn't follow up as academics as journalists You have an obligation to verify your sources and the people who've gotten into trouble are the ones who haven't verified their sources So, you know with respect to efforts we've done to address this, you know, we're trying to get academics on board You know, we realize that there's issues with the quality of Wikipedia You know there are a number of safeguards that maintain that quality, but we're still a small group of volunteers We need greater involvement of the of the global academic community to make Wikipedia the source we wish it to be So, you know The the primary thing that brings people into trouble is they show up and they add their own personal opinion Without providing references to reliable sources and that will get what you've added quickly reverted and possibly a little Note on your talk page, you know advising to use References from that point on the other thing that commonly gets people into trouble is, you know, they work for a charity They say hey Wikipedia gets a ton of views I'm gonna add links to my charity to every page that's even tangentially related on Wikipedia Those people quickly find themselves blocked or banned from Wikipedia, you know We're not here to be a list of external links to other people's webpages Yes, there's all these great charities out there, but Wikipedia isn't a compilation of Charities so those sorts of things will get people into trouble and then of course obvious conflict of interest Such as when you know pharmaceutical companies come and they remove negative comments about their pharmaceuticals that are well referenced That will get you into trouble as well