 Somebody's asking how you would compare the coronavirus to the 68 Hong Kong flu. So the 68 Hong Kong flu was one that killed a lot of people, but if you look at the U.S. toll of how many it killed, I do think that this is going to be higher than the 1968 flu. That was a cumbersome flu that did kill tens of thousands of Americans. I do think that this is probably going to be worse than the 1968 flu. This is not going to be 1918, but it's going to be worse than 1968, 1957, and 2009, which were other flu pandemics. Good. So anything, anything you'd like to say that I haven't asked about? No, I think, I mean, I think we covered a lot of it. I mean, I think this is going to be something that we're going to be watching for a while. And it's important to remember that there's not black or white answers to a lot of this stuff. It's a lot of gray and people trying to interpret things. And there is a lot of controversy in the field about very simple things that we still don't know the answers to this. We're learning this on the fly and we've not, you know, dealt with a pandemic of this scale since 1918. And I think that this there's a lot of a lot of differing voices within the field. So I think that it's important to remember that not every person in my field that has a position has a political agenda. They're basically everybody's trying to do their best to try and tell people what to do and try to prevent the catastrophe. This is and there is a balance and people have a different, different threshold for what kind of what kind of balance to strike between the economic shutdowns on the one hand and letting this virus go. And there's a lots of false alternatives being created. So I think that that's an important thing is that everybody's, you know, I think that there's just a lot of differing voices here and in a lot of controversies that haven't been quite settled yet. And it's hard. It's hard for people to maintain somehow to maintain their rationality in this environment. What we need today, what I called a new intellectual would be any man or woman who is willing to think. Meaning any man or woman who knows that man's life must be guided by reason, by the intellect, not by feelings, wishes, whims or mystic revelations. Any man or woman who values his life and who does not want to give in to today's cult of despair, cynicism and impotence and does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist. Using the super chat and I noticed yesterday when I appealed for support for the show, many of you step forward and actually supported the show for the first time. So I'll do it again. Maybe we'll get some more today. If you like what you're hearing, if you appreciate what I'm doing, then I appreciate your support. And those of you who don't yet support the show, please take this opportunity, go to your own book show dot com slash support or go to subscribe star dot com your own book show and and make a kind of a monthly contribution to keep this to keep this going. I'm not showing the next