 What's good to be honest with you, we're all back again with another video. So we're going to check out should WWE in the brand split. This is as of recent been a interesting topic since Roman is the undisputed WWE Universal Champion, as you will. He has both the titles, both belts or whatnot. And they are in talks of doing the unification of the tag team championships on Raw and SmackDown. So the question becomes, do they end the brand split? Is it just one brand? Do they unify everything? I don't know if that would be the best idea only because the roster is huge and they do have a lot of talent that needs to be showcased. So I don't know if they should, I guess in the brand split. I think it should be a combination of certain divisions should be held by one title. One title should be the one thing that certain divisions revolve around because they're not big enough. And then I do think in other situations that you can afford to have two championships for, you know, their respective brands. It just depends on the roster size and how they're able to manage that. Also, you have to put into consideration USA Network, Fox Network. They are not going to have let that happen. They have separate contracts with these network companies. They're not going to let that happen. I'm just telling you this now. This is why Ron Rousey is on Fox. This is the main reason why she is on Fox because Fox wanted her to be there. Any other time she probably would have been on the USA Network, but I'm sure Fox wanted that. Same thing, Fox wanted Roman Reigns. This is just one of those things. USA probably wanted Cody Rose. It's just the networks are not even going to let that happen. But we're going to get into this. Didn't want to take too much time on this. Appreciate all love and support. Let's get into it, man. With Roman Reigns being the undisputed WWE Universal Champion and now the Usos challenging RK Bro for their raw attack and championship titles in a unification match, there is a strong possibility that we might be seeing the end of the brand split. You see, there are some reasons why this might seem like a good idea on the surface. WWE did release a ton of wrestlers over the course of the last two years. Without that talent, it has been a little bit harder for the company to find stars for each brand. Smackdown has been actually really struggling to find challengers for Roman Reigns. Right now, I don't see anybody on his level other than Navy Drew McIntyre. Should say Nakamura is his next opponent and I just don't see him as a draw like that. If this was 2018, it would be a different story. However, it's not and Nakamura's value has really dropped. If there wasn't a brand split, he would have many more options. WWE could have booked a Seth Rollins feud again. Cody Rhoads is another name that would have been a top contender. Bobby Lashley could have been a possible rival. AJ Styles could have chased the undisputed title. As you can see, there are many more potential feuds without the brand splits. Another reason why this would- The brand split does help fresher matches. That's why I'm all for them unifying the tag team division. Because I actually was having a conversation with someone in the comments saying, that's a bad idea because now people are going to lose opportunities on getting seen on television. And it was one of those things where I was like, I don't think so. The tag team division on the main roster is not that big. That's why we see so many rematches. How many times have we seen a new day and the Usos go at it over and over and over? We only see like the same four tag teams throughout the division. But if you unify them, it makes fresh matchups. I don't know unifying the men's roster for the main titles. I don't know if that's going to work because obviously, once again, their roster is still a sizable amount. So it makes sense for them to have two shows. But at the same time, I do get what he's saying like unifying everything would give us fresh matchups, fresh opportunities. So I do get what he's saying. But at the same time, I don't think that would be the best route only because a lot of people are not going to get seen on television. Maybe it just depends on how they format it too. If it's just going to be one show or if it's still going to be raw on SmackDown, it's just they can float between both shows. Not sure if they were to do something like that. But be a good idea is for the company as a whole. SmackDown and Raw can feature their biggest stars and many people would show up to the shows because there are double the stars and the ratings would even see a possible increase. It seems like a no brainer to have a brand splits. However, that is the problem. Any of the brand splits seems like a good idea in theory, but in reality, it just doesn't work. In fact, it's a massive problem that WWE should avoid at all costs. To answer the question in the title, WWE should not end the brand splits. It would be very bad for the company. You don't need a. Yeah, I don't I don't think they can when it comes to just the main roster, especially for like the men's and the women's division. I don't think the brands will work. Like I said, the networks won't let it happen, but they can merge divisions. Certain divisions need to be merged. That's all I'm saying. Certain divisions need to be merged. These the shows need to have like their separate titles so that way people can feud like if you're on SmackDown. Obviously, you need to be trying to go for the SmackDown head championship will championship and vice versa if you're on Raw. But once again, this is why the whole unification thing. If you're going to do this is like, are you going to merge? Is the person who's the champ going to be able to go to Raw and SmackDown whenever they want because they have both belts? Not sure. It's it's very tricky, but I do not think they need to end the brand split because it's not going to work. It's going to ruin everything. This is why they originally created the brand split because there wasn't enough people being seen and televised. If you do this, you pretty much put a lot of people back in catering and they'll never be seen from really and then they'll end up getting let go. So think about if this would work or not because it already happened in the past and it really didn't work. In early 2002, WW created the brand split because they had too much talent on the roster and a lot of those guys did not get the proper time to shine. People think WW does not build new stars now. Just imagine if this happens, it would only make that problem even worse. Superstars like Sami Zayn, The Miz and Kevin Owens wouldn't get the same amount of screen time and that's why they would take it away from younger talent like Austin Theory or Gunther. Those guys would have less TV time. That's just one of the major reasons why it wouldn't work. The other big reason why this would fail is because one of the shows would get destroyed. If I had to guess, it would probably be SmackDown. SmackDown was the most unwatchable program from the years of 2012 through 2015. Those were seriously dark times. Top names like John Cena or Sam Punk didn't even show up to the show on those days clearly showing that WWE didn't care about SmackDown. And I fear the same thing will happen again. Raw would have the more interesting storylines and SmackDown would basically be a rerun with some mid-card title acts and whatnot. I'm not trying to see that again. I don't think Fox would be happy with that either. Imagine spending a billion dollars for SmackDown only for Raw to get everything good and you're basically just a filler show. It was a different story when Raw and SmackDown were both on the USA Network and I don't think the fans will be happy about this. The wrestlers won't be either and I don't think it's a good idea to piss off the executives paying you tons of money. On top of those two reasons, it will also eliminate the draft. Despite WWE not even doing a good job at booking the draft, it is nice to spice things up. I don't know why they do it a month before Survivor Series, but you get my point. The draft is fun and it makes each year unique. While some people love the idea of the Brin Split ending, it will be a mistake. WWE should not do it. I really hope they aren't leaning towards it either. As for the WWE Universal and now the Tag Team Championships, the company really messed up there and they got themselves trapped in a corner. The only thing that they can do right now is have the undistributed champions have two ongoing feuds on both Raw and SmackDown and I can't think of anything else other than that. It's a big mess and it will be interesting to see how WWE But I don't feel like there's enough women enough tag team like I think a lot of them tag teams are just throwing together not really women tag teams. If that makes any sense, they're not traditional tag teams. They're just sell solo women put together to build a tag team division. It's not much of them either either. Honestly, honestly, I'm not sure if I would keep the women's tag team championships as a thing. Me personally granted, they can float between both shows possibly, but we would just be seeing the same matchups because they're not really traditional tag teams. I would probably get rid of that. And if anything on the women side of the thing, you could possibly and I mean possibly keep the women's Raw and SmackDown championship belts as separate entities because you'll be able to stretch out the roster. They still have a decent amount of women on both brands granted. They would probably need a little bit more for it to make sense, but it makes sense for them to do it that way. And then for the men's, you kind of need to split it up in a sense because there's a lot of people that are going for titles in the men's division. Granted, you can keep the, you know, definitely keep the Intercontinental Championship on one show, the United States Championship on another show. So there's a mid-card tier belt for both shows. But that's why I was interested when they said unification because it's not really going to be a unification there. I'm willing to bet and I'm calling this now. I hope I'm correct on this. I can see at some point this year, Roman Reigns will drop the WWE Championship. Unless they combine the belts, they make one single belt. Roman Reigns will drop the WWE Championship, most likely to Cody Rose sometime later on this year. And he, he'll still, he'll take a loss, his first actual loss, but he'll still be the Universal Champion. He'll still be the longest reigning Universal Champion. So I can see them doing that, but they will have these shows will have their separate belts. I think the only thing they need to merge in my personal opinion is just the tag division because they don't have enough tag teams. On each show. Because if not, you're going to keep getting the same matches over and over and over. So they have to do that unless, unless whoever has the tag belts, whoever has the Universal Undisputed Championship belt or whatever, they got a float between both shows. So that could be a thing. If they want to do that, those belts float between both shows. So I don't know. But comment down below. Let me know how would you guys, I guess you could say. Set this up. Book this. Would you guys be all for the brand split ending? Or would you guys keep the brand split, but have certain titles and divisions float between both shows? Especially if their roster for those divisions is not that deep. How would you do that? How would you book that? Let me know down below. I'm pretty sure you guys are going to come up with some pretty interesting ideas. Can't wait to see it, but I appreciate all of the support. Road to ADK. Appreciate y'all kicking me. See y'all in the next one. Peace.