 Good morning, it's Lucina. Good morning, this is Taylor. Hi, this is Udi from Cloud 66. Good morning, our afternoon. Good morning Udi. We'll give it just a couple more minutes to help spend joining. I'm going to have to hang up at the bottom half of the hour. Apologies in advance. Mostly in a listening mode for this one. Because I just got a note of this meeting yesterday. Sounds good. Lucina, would you like me to share my screen? I think I'm good for that. Yes, please. I can back up if you need it. Do you have anyone else add anything for the agenda? Does it look like it? Do you add in yourself there? Great, get started. Hey Dan, we have Udi from Cloud 66 with us. You said you just found out about this yesterday. Is that correct? Yes, we're on a bunch of mailing lists. I thought I would join in listening mode and see what this is about and if we can contribute. Sounds good. Where did you say you heard about their call? Through the marketing mailing list. Let me just take a look through one of our team customers. Can I email from Lucina Freco? Okay. On the mailing list. Okay, probably. Sounds good. Right now this is twice monthly. The second and fourth Tuesday. We may be adjusting either the time or frequency depending on attendance and stuff. I think that's a good number of people. I think we can do this. Sometimes we have a good number of people and sometimes it can be just a few like this. We'll see. Let's go ahead and adjust it. If you don't mind. Since we're going to meet in person, could we just go ahead and only have it on the fourth Tuesday of the month? Sure. Lucina, could you please make a habit to send out an email three times a week? Absolutely. Do you see the note I sent out Friday? Do you think that's soon enough? No, I missed it. That sounds fine. I'm going to delete it from the official CNCF public calendar. But if you could edit it on the GitHub page and the TFC page as well, that would be great. I think she may have access to that public calendar, but I can update there. So some updates on the dashboard. So we've had a call with Spinnaker looking at potentially using Spinnaker as an alternative to GitLab for the runners, where we run everything for doing the deploys and provisioning everything, and splitting off that portion of the code so that we could sit on top of anything that could provide that part of the cross-cloud project as well as talking with VMware and Oracle. Oracle is looking at helping with adding their cloud, which is nice. We added a modal on the frontend dashboard. We've also made some of the rest of the source code public. So the frontend dashboard itself and the status repository moved those over and got everything in place, split some of the code up. And those are now up there in public. So that's good. It's been a lot of feedback on that. And that may be something at KubeCon where we're talking more about packet. Been working with them on the provisioning and moving some of the instances around, still working on that. It looks like some of the items, as far as the issues are saying, we may have figured out what's going on with the allocations. It seems like something with their API when you're doing a lot of requests at the same time. We saw that while adding 110 support for Kubernetes. So that's in progress. We're nearly done with that. There's a lot of things around certificates and how authorization is handled. The RBAC support in Kubernetes 110. And so updating everything, the templates to support that, it's all backwards compatible. So we keep supporting older versions, but just adding in that support and finding differences on how the different providers work, like the OpenSack side with VEX host, some DNS things there, IBM cloud, what we're doing there. So once that's in place, then we should be good for all the 110. Like this was originally 110.0. And it looks good for 110.1 as well. So the ONAP integration, that one's actually looks good. Right now, I believe that was green as of this morning. I'll pull that up. So that's the supporting the upstream changes for their head release. And it looks green on the providers that passed. We were able to go through. So we'll let them know today that that was fixed. So that's an integration update with that change on their build server. So there we go. So we will be in Copenhagen for KubeCon doing an intro and deep dive. So I've been preparing for that and trying to make the deep dive relevant to what we've been hearing from the community. Going to be doing some in-person meetings and stuff. Are you going to be in Copenhagen, Judy? Yes, we have a booth and I'll be there. Awesome. We'll be there as well. So we're also looking at making some changes for the dashboard itself that I was showing here. Results and talking to community and thinking about what we want to show, how tests can be most relevant and the display of those. And we're just talking about this. So I think we're going to move to once a month. Now the last, the fourth, Tuesday. Again, KubeCon Europe working with community for the end-to-end test. And we are hoping together a lot of feedback over the next two weeks for what cross-cloud. This project should look like going forward, including the API that we're working on, making available. So that's a status repository. And making that most useful for other projects to integrate with for both submitting feedback, submitting status and other information via the API, as well as pulling information. So we can look at stuff like how Kubernetes version runs on a different cloud provider and not just look at the dashboard, but be able to pull that. So it'll be part of that. And then what we actually want to test and stuff like that. So this one. Can I just, sorry. Looking to go ahead in terms of the number of providers you have, are you, is the working group happy with the number of providers or is there a wish to extend it to more clouds? The reason I ask is before this job I used to run the public cloud business that we've been to. So I have a different network of clouds inside the U.S. and outside the U.S. And I'm happy to help if that is a thing. Yeah. So we do want to add more clouds and having, I guess, community contributed or provider contributed is nicest so that we could add more sooner. So OpenStack was 95% contributed by the open, some folks at OpenStack on the OpenStack community. And Oracle Cloud looks like that may be another big one that's contributed. So anything there would be a big help. Let me just speak to that though, which is we have great contacts at all the CNCF member companies, which essentially represent all the biggest public clouds and districts as well. And so our issues more about resources of trying to get folks to do the work as opposed to us having to do it. Because, you know, if you look at that chart, we're both trying to expand to the right by adding more clouds and also down by adding more projects. Yeah. Yeah. I'm going to become kind of a solution finder situation where it's a bit too crowded. Okay. Yeah. So we can try more next week. I mean, just only if it's helpful, especially the smaller ones. I'm sure you guys have very good access into the big one. Yeah. And if that's something that you have an interest or have contacts advanced, as far as the resources like Dan was saying, that could help on those. And especially the smaller ones. That'd be great. And the deep dive that we're doing is about the provisioning component. So that's on the cross cloud project. So get have.com slash cross cloud and the deep dive itself is on the provisioner. And that's cross cloud. So we'll be going through this and looking at how, how this works and talking a little bit about how. Other folks can help contribute. Directly. Well, I was mentioning open stack. That's a good one to look at. And. Yeah. As well as the projects like Daniel's mentioned as well going down. So that's it. And I don't think we have anything else on the agenda unless you had something yourself. You want to speak to. If that was for me, no, I don't have anything. I'm just. Mostly learning about. Okay. Dan, do you have anything? Nope. I'm just looking forward to seeing you in Copenhagen and looking at this question of. Over the medium term. What is the right matrix of what could be tested on what. Absolutely. Trying to gather feedback hoping to get a whole lot of that on the agenda. And I'm looking forward to that. And I'm looking forward to that at. Cube con as well. And talking to people in the main time and thinking about internally. So. Looking forward to it. Well, it looks like we have missed the hour that we can. Give it back to everyone. Thank you. Thanks everyone.